34601Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#FZ v DER Touristik GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Köln.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 12 – Package tour – Long delay of a flight – Passenger compensation – Further compensation — Passenger’s right to a reduction of the price of the trip.#Case C-153/19.cjeu_case · 28 мая 2020 г.
34602Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 28 mai 2020.#Asociación de fabricantes de morcilla de Burgos contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Article 73, paragraphe 1, du règlement de procédure du Tribunal – Ordonnance du Tribunal concluant à l’irrecevabilité manifeste d’un recours pour absence de signature manuscrite – Requête en version papier comportant l’impression d’une signature électronique authentifiée.#Affaire C-309/19 P.cjeu_case · 28 мая 2020 г.
34603Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#Asociación de fabricantes de morcilla de Burgos v European Commission.#Appeal — Article 73(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Order of the General Court finding an action manifestly inadmissible for lack of a handwritten signature — Paper version of the application including a printed authenticated electronic signature.#Case C-309/19 P.cjeu_case · 28 мая 2020 г.
34604Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Safety on the Community’s railways – Directive 2004/49/EC – Article 21(1) and (2) – Lack of adoption of the necessary provisions to ensure the organisational independence of the investigative body and its independent access to sufficient resources.#Case C-33/19.cjeu_case · 28 мая 2020 г.
34605Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Safety on the Community’s railways – Directive 2004/49/EC – Article 21(1) and (2) – Lack of adoption of the necessary provisions to ensure the organisational independence of the investigative body and its independent access to sufficient resources.#Case C-33/19.cjeu_case · 28 мая 2020 г.
34606Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 28 May 2020.#Société Eco TLC v Ministre de la Transition écologique et solidaire and Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Article 107(1) TFEU – Concept of ‘State resources’ – Increased responsibility of producers – Eco-body approved by the public authorities to collect financial contributions from those who place on the market certain products in order to be able to fulfil, on their behalf, their legal obligation to treat waste from those products – Financial support paid by that eco-body to contractually bound sorting operators.#Case C-556/19.cjeu_case · 28 мая 2020 г.
34607Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 28 May 2020.#Tax-Fin-Lex d.o.o. v Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Državna revizijska komisija za revizijo postopkov oddaje javnih naročil.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public service contracts – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 2(1)(5) – Concept of ‘public contract’ – Concept of ‘contract for pecuniary interest’ – Tenderer’s bid at a price of EUR 0.00 – Rejection of the tender – Article 69 – Abnormally low tender.#Case C-367/19.cjeu_case · 28 мая 2020 г.
34608Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 28 May 2020.#EZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Hannover.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directive 2011/95/EU – Conditions for granting refugee status – Refusal to perform military service – Article 9(2)(e) – Law of the country of origin which does not provide for the right to conscience objection – Protection of persons who have fled their country of origin after the expiry of the period for suspending military service – Article 9(3) – Connection between the reasons mentioned in Article 10 of that directive and the prosecution and punishment referred to in Article 9(2)(e) of that directive – Evidence.#Case C-238/19.cjeu_case · 28 мая 2020 г.
34609Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 28 May 2020.#B. v Centre public d'action sociale de Líège (CPAS).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Third-country national suffering from a serious illness – Return decision – Judicial remedy – Automatic suspensory effect – Conditions – Grant of social assistance – Articles 19 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-233/19.cjeu_case · 28 мая 2020 г.
34610Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 28 May 2020.#Bank Refah Kargaran v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) – Article 29 TEU – Article 215 TFEU – Restrictive measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran to prevent nuclear proliferation – Harm allegedly suffered by the appellant as a result of its name being included and maintained on the list of persons and entities covered by the freezing of financial funds and resources – Actions for damages – Jurisdiction of the CJEU to hear and determine an action for damages for the harm allegedly caused by restrictive measures taken in decisions adopted pursuant to the CFSP – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Inadequate statement of reasons for legal acts imposing restrictive measures.#Case C-134/19 P.cjeu_case · 28 мая 2020 г.
34611Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 28 May 2020.#European Commission v Portuguese Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Electronic communications – Universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services – Directive 2002/22/EC – Networks and services – Article 13 – Financing of universal service obligations – Sharing mechanism – Principles of transparency, least market distortion, non-discrimination and proportionality.#Case C-49/19.cjeu_case · 28 мая 2020 г.
34612Case C-153/19: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 May 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Köln — Germany) — FZ v DER Touristik GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 12 — Package tour — Long delay of a flight — Passengers’ compensation — Additional compensation — Passenger’s right to a reduction in the price of the journey)cjeu_case · 28 мая 2020 г.
34613Case C-309/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 May 2020 — Asociación de fabricantes de morcilla de Burgos v European Commission (Appeal — Article 73(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Order of the General Court finding an action manifestly inadmissible for lack of a handwritten signature — Paper version of the application including a printed authenticated electronic signature)cjeu_case · 28 мая 2020 г.
34614Case C-33/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 May 2020 — European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Railway safety — Directive 2004/49/EC — Article 21(1) and (2) — Failure to adopt the provisions necessary to ensure the organisational independence of the investigating body and its autonomous access to sufficient resources)cjeu_case · 28 мая 2020 г.
34615Order of the President of the General Court of 28 May 2020.#Darment Oy v European Commission.#Application for interim relief – Satisfaction accorded to the main action – No need to adjudicate.#Case T-739/18 R.cjeu_case · 28 мая 2020 г.
34616Order of the President of the General Court of 28 May 2020.#Darment Oy v European Commission.#Application for interim relief – Satisfaction accorded to the main action – No need to adjudicate.#Case T-739/18 R.cjeu_case · 28 мая 2020 г.
34617Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#Darment Oy v European Commission.#Environment – Fluorinated greenhouse gases – Regulation (EU) No 517/2014 – Placing of hydrofluorocarbons on the market – Decision finding that an undertaking exceeded the quota allocated to it and imposing on it a penalty – Correction of the electronic registry for quotas – Transfer of quota – Authorisation to use a quota – Principle of good administration.#Case T-739/18.cjeu_case · 28 мая 2020 г.
34618Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#Darment Oy v European Commission.#Environment – Fluorinated greenhouse gases – Regulation (EU) No 517/2014 – Placing of hydrofluorocarbons on the market – Decision finding that an undertaking exceeded the quota allocated to it and imposing on it a penalty – Correction of the electronic registry for quotas – Transfer of quota – Authorisation to use a quota – Principle of good administration.#Case T-739/18.cjeu_case · 28 мая 2020 г.
34619Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#Aurea Biolabs Pte Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark AUREA BIOLABS — Earlier EU word mark AUREA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Correction of the Board of Appeal’s decision — Article 102 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Cases T-724/18 and T-184/19.cjeu_case · 28 мая 2020 г.
34620Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 May 2020.#Aurea Biolabs Pte Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark AUREA BIOLABS — Earlier EU word mark AUREA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Correction of the Board of Appeal’s decision — Article 102 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Cases T-724/18 and T-184/19.cjeu_case · 28 мая 2020 г.