34461Case T-351/20: Action brought on 5 June 2020 — St. Hippolyt v EUIPO — Raisioaqua (Vital like nature)cjeu_case · 5 июня 2020 г.
34462Case T-348/20: Action brought on 5 June 2020 — Freistaat Bayern v EUIPO (GEWÜRZSOMMELIER)cjeu_case · 5 июня 2020 г.
34463Case C-243/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Polymeles Protodikeio Αthinon (Greece) lodged on 5 June 2020 — DP, SG v Trapeza Peiraios AEcjeu_case · 5 июня 2020 г.
34464Case C-241/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance du Luxembourg (Belgium) lodged on 5 June 2020 — BJ v État belgecjeu_case · 5 июня 2020 г.
34465Case C-240/20 P: Appeal brought on 5 June 2020 by Giorgio Armani SpA against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 26 March 2020 in Case T-654/18, Armani v EUIPOcjeu_case · 5 июня 2020 г.
34466Case C-239/20 P: Appeal brought on 5 June 2020 by Giorgio Armani SpA against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 26 March 2020 in Case T-653/18, Armani v EUIPOcjeu_case · 5 июня 2020 г.
34467Case C-238/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 5 June 2020 — SIA ‘Sātiņi-S’ v Dabas aizsardzības pārvaldecjeu_case · 5 июня 2020 г.
34468Case C-237/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 5 June 2020 — Federatie Nederlandse Vakbeweging v Heiploeg Seafood International BV, Heitrans International BVcjeu_case · 5 июня 2020 г.
34469Case C-235/20 P: Appeal brought on 5 June 2020 by ViaSat, Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 26 March 2020 in Case T-734/17, ViaSat v Commissioncjeu_case · 5 июня 2020 г.
34470Case C-10/20: Order of the President of the Court of 5 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Flightright GmbH v Eurowings GmbHcjeu_case · 5 июня 2020 г.
34471Case C-40/19: Order of the President of the Court of 5 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (formerly Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság) — Hungary) — EY v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság, anciennement Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatalcjeu_case · 5 июня 2020 г.
34472Case T-354/20: Action brought on 4 June 2020 — Kfz-Gewerbe v EUIPO — The Blink Fish (Representation of a fish)cjeu_case · 4 июня 2020 г.
34473Case T-345/20: Action brought on 4 June 2020 — Robert Klingel v EUIPO (MEN+)cjeu_case · 4 июня 2020 г.
34474Order of the Court of 4 June 2020.#Société des produits Nestlé SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-97/20 P.cjeu_case · 4 июня 2020 г.
34475Order of the Court of 4 June 2020.#Société des produits Nestlé SA v Amigüitos pets & life and European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-97/20 P.cjeu_case · 4 июня 2020 г.
34476Order of the Court of 4 June 2020.#Refan Bulgaria OOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-72/20 P.cjeu_case · 4 июня 2020 г.
34477Order of the Court of 4 June 2020.#Refan Bulgaria OOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-72/20 P.cjeu_case · 4 июня 2020 г.
34478Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 June 2020.#TJ v Balga Srl.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Protection in the event of unjustified dismissal – Articles 20, 21, 34 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 98/59/EC – Collective dismissal – National legislation on the protection to be granted to a worker who is the victim of unjustified collective dismissal due to infringement of the criteria for the choice of workers to be dismissed – No situation of implementation of EU law, within the meaning of Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Inapplicability of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Manifest lack of jurisdiction.#Case C-32/20.cjeu_case · 4 июня 2020 г.
34479Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 June 2020.#TJ v Balga Srl.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte di appello di Napoli.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Protection in the event of unjustified dismissal – Articles 20, 21, 34 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 98/59/EC – Collective dismissal – National legislation on the protection to be granted to a worker who is the victim of unjustified collective dismissal due to infringement of the criteria for the choice of workers to be dismissed – No situation of implementation of EU law, within the meaning of Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Inapplicability of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Manifest lack of jurisdiction.#Case C-32/20.cjeu_case · 4 июня 2020 г.
34480Case C-236/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Emilia Romagna (Italy) lodged on 4 June 2020 — PG v Ministero della Giustizia, CSM — Consiglio Superiore della Magistratura, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministricjeu_case · 4 июня 2020 г.