34421Case T-105/19: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — Louis Vuitton Malletier v EUIPO — Wisniewski (Device of a chequerboard Pattern) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark representing a chequerboard pattern — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Well-known facts — Distinctive character acquired through use — Overall assessment of the evidence of the distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 59(1) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 10 июня 2020 г.
34422Case T-100/19: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — L. Oliva Torras v EUIPO — Mecánica del Frío (Vehicle couplings) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a coupling to hitch refrigeration or air conditioning equipment to a motor vehicle — Single head of claim seeking alteration — Implicit application for annulment — Admissibility — Ground of invalidity — Failure to comply with the requirements for protection — Articles 4 to 9 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Extent of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal — Position adopted by the Board of Appeal on the failure to comply with a requirement for protection during the procedure — Divergent conclusion in the contested decision — Obligation to state reasons — Article 62 and second sentence of Article 63(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)cjeu_case · 10 июня 2020 г.
34423Case T-83/19: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — AL v Commission (Civil service — Special advisers — Appointment to the post of representative of the European Union in an international partnership body — Appointment of another representative of the European Union — Legitimate expectations — Right to be heard — Principle of good administration and duty to have regard to the welfare of officials — Liability)cjeu_case · 10 июня 2020 г.
34424Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 June 2020.#Boyer v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark PHILIBON DEPUIS 1957 www.philibon.com – Earlier national figurative mark PHILICON – Relative ground for refusal – Well-known trade mark within the meaning of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention – Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-718/18.cjeu_case · 10 июня 2020 г.
34425Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 June 2020.#Boyer v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark PHILIBON DEPUIS 1957 www.philibon.com – Earlier national figurative mark PHILICON – Relative ground for refusal – Well-known trade mark within the meaning of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention – Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-718/18.cjeu_case · 10 июня 2020 г.
34426Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 June 2020.#B.D. - Boyer Developpement v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark PHILIBON – Earlier national figurative mark PHILICON – Relative ground for refusal – Well-known trade mark within the meaning of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention – Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-717/18.cjeu_case · 10 июня 2020 г.
34427Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 June 2020.#B.D. - Boyer Developpement v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark PHILIBON – Earlier national figurative mark PHILICON – Relative ground for refusal – Well-known trade mark within the meaning of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention – Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-717/18.cjeu_case · 10 июня 2020 г.
34428Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 June 2020.#Mark Anthony Sammut v European Parliament.#Civil Service – Officials – Rights and obligations of an official – Publication of a matter dealing with the work of the Union – Obligation to provide information in advance – Article 17a of the Staff Regulations – Staff report – Liability.#Case T-608/18.cjeu_case · 10 июня 2020 г.
34429Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 June 2020.#Mark Anthony Sammut v European Parliament.#Civil Service – Officials – Rights and obligations of an official – Publication of a matter dealing with the work of the Union – Obligation to provide information in advance – Article 17a of the Staff Regulations – Staff report – Liability.#Case T-608/18.cjeu_case · 10 июня 2020 г.
34430Case T-718/18: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — Boyer v EUIPO — Philicon-97 (PHILIBON DEPUIS 1957 www.philibon.com) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark PHILIBON DEPUIS 1957 www.philibon.com — Earlier national figurative mark PHILICON — Relative ground for refusal — Well-known trade mark within the meaning of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention — Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 10 июня 2020 г.
34431Case T-717/18: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — B.D v EUIPO — Philicon-97 (PHILIBON) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark PHILIBON — Earlier national figurative mark PHILICON — Relative ground for refusal — Well-known trade mark within the meaning of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention — Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 10 июня 2020 г.
34432Case T-608/18: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — Sammut v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Rights and obligations of officials — Publication of a matter dealing with the work of the European Union — Obligation to provide information in advance — Article 17a of the Staff Regulations — Staff report — Liability)cjeu_case · 10 июня 2020 г.
34433Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 June 2020.#Spliethoff's Bevrachtingskantoor BV v European Commission.#Financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) – Transport sector for the period 2014-2020 – Calls for proposals – Decision establishing the list of proposals selected – Rejection of the proposal – Manifest errors of assessment – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-564/15 RENV.cjeu_case · 10 июня 2020 г.
34434Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 June 2020.#Spliethoff's Bevrachtingskantoor BV v European Commission.#Financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) – Transport sector for the period 2014-2020 – Calls for proposals – Decision establishing the list of proposals selected – Rejection of the proposal – Manifest errors of assessment – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-564/15 RENV.cjeu_case · 10 июня 2020 г.
34435Case T-564/15 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor v Commission (Financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Transport sector for the period 2014-2020 — Calls for proposals — Decision establishing the list of proposals selected — Rejection of the proposal — Manifest errors of assessment — Equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 10 июня 2020 г.
34436Case T-363/20: Action brought on 9 June 2020 — Krasnyj Octyabr v EUIPO — Spółdzielnia ‘Pokój’ (KRÓWKA MLECZNA Milk FUDGE)cjeu_case · 9 июня 2020 г.
34437Case T-350/20: Action brought on 9 June 2020 — Wagenknecht v Commissioncjeu_case · 9 июня 2020 г.
34438Case C-257/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 9 June 2020 — Viva Telekom Bulgaria EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika — Sofiacjeu_case · 9 июня 2020 г.
34439Case C-254/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 9 June 2020 — PI Pharma NV v Novartis AG, Novartis Pharma NVcjeu_case · 9 июня 2020 г.
34440Case C-253/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 9 June 2020 — Impexeco NV v Novartis AGcjeu_case · 9 июня 2020 г.