34041Ordonnance du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 3 juillet 2020.#Carlo Tognoli e.a. contre Parlement européen.#Recours en annulation – Droit institutionnel – Statut unique du député européen – Députés européens élus dans des circonscriptions italiennes – Adoption par l’Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (office de la présidence de la Chambre des députés, Italie) de la décision no 14/2018, en matière de pensions ‐ Modification du montant des pensions – Recours manifestement irrecevables.#Affaires jointes T-395/19, T-396/19, T-405/19, T-408/19, T-419/19, T-423/19, T-424/19, T-428/19, T-433/19, T-437/19, T-443/19, T-455/19, T-458/19 à T-462/19, T-464/19, T-469/19 et T-477/19.cjeu_case · 3 июля 2020 г.
34042Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2020.#Carlo Tognoli and Others v European Parliament.#Actions for annulment – Institutional law – Single statute for Members of the European Parliament – Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies – Adoption by the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, Italy) of Decision No 14/2018, on pensions – Change in the amount of pensions – Manifestly inadmissible actions.#Joined Cases T-395/19, T-396/19, T-405/19, T-408/19, T-419/19, T-423/19, T-424/19, T-428/19, T-433/19, T-437/19, T-443/19, T-455/19, T-458/19 to T-462/19, T-464/19, T-469/19 and T-477/19.cjeu_case · 3 июля 2020 г.
34043Ordonnance du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 3 juillet 2020.#Enrico Falqui et Danilo Poggiolini contre Parlement européen.#Recours en annulation – Droit institutionnel – Statut unique du député européen – Députés européens élus dans des circonscriptions italiennes – Adoption par l’Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (office de la présidence de la Chambre des députés, Italie) de la décision no 14/2018, en matière de pensions‐ Modification du montant des pensions – Recours manifestement irrecevables.#Affaires jointes T-347/19 et T-348/19.cjeu_case · 3 июля 2020 г.
34044Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 July 2020.#Enrico Falqui and Danilo Poggiolini v European Parliament.#Actions for annulment – Institutional law – Single statute for Members of the European Parliament – Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies – Adoption by the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, Italy) of Decision No 14/2018, on pensions‐ Change in the amount of pensions – Manifestly inadmissible actions.#Joined Cases T-347/19 and T-348/19.cjeu_case · 3 июля 2020 г.
34045Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 3 July 2020.#Solar Ileias Bompaina AE v European Commission.#Action for annulment – State aid – Operators on the market in electricity produced from renewable energy sources – Power purchase agreements – Legislative amendments with retroactive effect limiting tariff advantages – Complaint to the Commission alleging aid in favour of energy suppliers – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Status as an interested party – Safeguarding of procedural rights – Inadmissibility.#Case T-143/19.cjeu_case · 3 июля 2020 г.
34046Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 3 July 2020.#Solar Ileias Bompaina AE v European Commission.#Action for annulment – State aid – Operators on the market in electricity produced from renewable energy sources – Power purchase agreements – Legislative amendments with retroactive effect limiting tariff advantages – Complaint to the Commission alleging aid in favour of energy suppliers – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Status as an interested party – Safeguarding of procedural rights – Inadmissibility.#Case T-143/19.cjeu_case · 3 июля 2020 г.
34047Joined cases T-395/19, T-396/19, T-405/19, T-408/19, T-419/19, T-423/19, T-424/19, T-428/19, T-433/19, T-437/19, T-443/19, T-455/19, T-458/19 to T-462/19, T-464/19, T-469/19 and T-477/19: Order of the General Court of 3 July 2020 — Tognoli and Others v Parliament (Actions for annulment — Institutional law — Single statute for Members of the European Parliament — Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies — Adoption by the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, Italy) of Decision No 14/2018, on pensions — Change in the amount of pensions — Manifestly inadmissible actions)cjeu_case · 3 июля 2020 г.
34048Joined cases T-347/19 and T-348/19: Order of the General Court of 3 July 2020 — Falqui and Poggiolini v Parliament (Actions for annulment — Institutional law — Single statute for Members of the European Parliament — Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies — Adoption by the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, Italy) of Decision No 14/2018, on pensions — Change in the amount of pensions — Manifestly inadmissible actions)cjeu_case · 3 июля 2020 г.
34049Case T-143/19: Order of the General Court of 3 July 2020 — Solar Ileias Bompaina v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Hellenic Republic — Operators on the market in electricity produced from renewable energy sources — Power purchase agreements — Legislative amendments with retroactive effect limiting tariff advantages — Complaint to the Commission alleging aid in favour of energy suppliers — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Status as an interested party — Safeguarding of procedural rights — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 3 июля 2020 г.
34052Case T-406/20: Action brought on 2 July 2020 — Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v SRBcjeu_case · 2 июля 2020 г.
34054Case C-297/20 P: Appeal brought on 2 July 2020 by Peter Sabo, Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK, Hasso Krull, 2 Celsius, Bernard Auric, Tony Lowes, Kent Roberson, Hiite Maja SA, Association de lutte contre toutes formes de Nuisance et de Pollutions sur les communes de Meyreuil et Gardanne (ALNP Meyreuil — Gardanne), Friends of the Irish Environment CLG against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 6 May 2020 in Case T-141/19, Sabo and Others v Parliament and Councilcjeu_case · 2 июля 2020 г.
34055Case C-295/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 2 July 2020 — ‘Sanresa’ UAB v Aplinkos apsaugos departamentas prie Aplinkos ministerijoscjeu_case · 2 июля 2020 г.
34056Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 July 2020.#Christoph Klein v European Commission.#Action for failure to act – Medical devices – Article 8(1) and (2) of Directive 93/42/EEC – Safeguard clause procedure – Notification by a Member State of a decision prohibiting the placing on the market of a medical device – Absence of a decision by the Commission – Out of time – Inadmissibility.#Case T-562/19.cjeu_case · 2 июля 2020 г.
34057Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 July 2020.#Christoph Klein v European Commission.#Action for failure to act – Medical devices – Article 8(1) and (2) of Directive 93/42/EEC – Safeguard clause procedure – Notification by a Member State of a decision prohibiting the placing on the market of a medical device – Absence of a decision by the Commission – Out of time – Inadmissibility.#Case T-562/19.cjeu_case · 2 июля 2020 г.
34058Case T-562/19: Order of the General Court of 2 July 2020 — Klein v Commission (Action for failure to act — Medical devices — Article 8(1) and (2) of Directive 93/42/EEC — Safeguard clause procedure — Notification by a Member State of a decision prohibiting the placing on the market of a medical device — Absence of a decision by the Commission — Out of time — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 2 июля 2020 г.
34059Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 2 juillet 2020.#IM contre Sting Reality s.r.o.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 2005/29/CE – Pratiques commerciales déloyales des entreprises vis-à-vis des consommateurs – Articles 8 et 9 – Pratiques commerciales agressives – Directive 93/13/CEE – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Clause faisant l’objet d’une négociation individuelle – Pouvoirs du juge national.#Affaire C-853/19.cjeu_case · 2 июля 2020 г.
34060Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 July 2020.#IM v Sting Reality s.r.o.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Poprad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Consumer protection – Directive 2005/29/EC – Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices – Articles 8 and 9 – Aggressive commercial practices – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Term which has been individually negotiated – Powers of the national court.#Case C-853/19.cjeu_case · 2 июля 2020 г.