33441Case C-530/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — NM, acting as liquidator of NIKI Luftfahrt GmbH v ON (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Articles 5 and 9 — Obligation of the air carrier to offer hotel accommodation to passengers whose flights have been cancelled — Damage suffered by a passenger during her stay at the hotel providing the accommodation — Possibility of invoking the liability of the air carrier as a result of negligence on the part of employees of the hotel)cjeu_case · 3 сентября 2020 г.
33442Joined Cases C-503/19 and C-592/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 17 de Barcelona, Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo No 5 de Barcelona — Spain) — UQ (C-503/19), SI (C-592/19) v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Barcelona (References for a preliminary ruling — Status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents — Directive 2003/109/EC — Article 6(1) — Elements to be taken into consideration — National rules — Failure to take those elements into consideration — Refusal to grant long-term resident status on the ground that the person concerned has previous convictions)cjeu_case · 3 сентября 2020 г.
33443Case C-356/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy w Warszawie — Poland) — Delfly sp. z o.o. v Smartwings Poland sp. z o.o., formerly Travel Service Polska sp. z o.o. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 7 — Right to compensation in the event of delay or cancellation of a flight — Compensation procedure — Claim expressed in national currency — National provision prohibiting the creditor from choosing the currency)cjeu_case · 3 сентября 2020 г.
33444Case C-214/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 — achtung! GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 7(1)(b) — Distinctive character — None)cjeu_case · 3 сентября 2020 г.
33445Case C-186/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Supreme Site Services GmbH, Supreme Fuels GmbH & Co KG, Supreme Fuels Trading Fze v Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 1(1) — Scope — Civil and commercial matters — Jurisdiction — Exclusive jurisdiction — Article 24(5) — Disputes concerning the enforcement of judgments — Action brought by an international organisation based on immunity from execution seeking to have an interim garnishee order lifted and a prohibition on new orders being levied on the same grounds)cjeu_case · 3 сентября 2020 г.
33446Joined Cases C-84/19, C-222/19 and C-252/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Szczecin — Prawobrzeże i Zachód w Szczecinie, Sąd Rejonowy w Opatowie — Poland) — Profi Credit Polska SA v QJ (C-84/19), BW v DR (C-222/19), QL v CG (C-252/19) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Article 1(2) — Scope — National provision providing for the maximum amount of non-interest credit costs — Article 3(1) — Contractual term passing on to the consumer costs of the lender’s business activity — Significant imbalance between the rights and obligations of the parties — Article 4(2) — Obligation to draft contract terms in plain intelligible language — Contractual terms which do not specify the services for which remuneration is sought — Directive 2008/48/EC — Article 3(g) — National legislation laying down a method of calculating the maximum non-interest credit cost which may be charged to the consumer)cjeu_case · 3 сентября 2020 г.
33447Joined Cases C-21/19 to C-23/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden — Netherlands) — Criminal proceedings against XN (C-21/19), YO (C-22/19), P.F. Kamstra Recycling BV (C-23/19) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Waste — Shipments — Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 — Waste subject to the prior written notification and consent procedure — Article 1(3) — Shipments subject to approval requirements — Directive 2008/98/EC — Article 5(1) — Concept of ‘by-products’ — Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 — Article 3, point 1 — Concept of ‘animal by-products’ — Shipments of a mixture of animal by-products and other material)cjeu_case · 3 сентября 2020 г.
33448Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#Mauro Bettani v European Commission.#Application for interpretation – Lack of legal representation – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-392/18 P-INT.cjeu_case · 3 сентября 2020 г.
33449Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#Mauro Bettani v European Commission.#Application for interpretation – Lack of legal representation – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-392/18 P-INT.cjeu_case · 3 сентября 2020 г.
33450Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#Application for interpretation – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-91/18 INT.cjeu_case · 3 сентября 2020 г.
33451Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#Application for interpretation – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-91/18 INT.cjeu_case · 3 сентября 2020 г.
33452Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 3 septembre 2020.#Vereniging tot Behoud van Natuurmonumenten in Nederland e.a. contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Aides d’État – Régime d’aides relatif à l’acquisition subventionnée ou à la mise à disposition à titre gracieux de zones naturelles – Procédure préliminaire d’examen – Décision déclarant l’aide compatible avec le marché intérieur – Recours en annulation – Recevabilité – Règlement (CE) no 659/1999 – Article 1er, sous h) – Notion de “parties intéressées” – Rapport de concurrence – Notion de “difficultés sérieuses” – Service d’intérêt économique général – Activités secondaires – Connexité.#Affaire C-817/18 P.cjeu_case · 3 сентября 2020 г.
33453Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#Vereniging tot Behoud van Natuurmonumenten in Nederland and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Aid scheme relating to the subsidised acquisition or free granting of nature land – Preliminary examination stage – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 – Article 1(h) – Meaning of ‘interested party’ – Competitive relationship – Meaning of ‘serious difficulties’ – Service of general economic interest – Secondary activities – Related actions.#Case C-817/18 P.cjeu_case · 3 сентября 2020 г.
33454Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#Mellifera eV, Vereinigung für wesensgemäße Bienenhaltung v European Commission.#Appeal – Aarhus Convention – Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Article 2(1)(g) and Article 10(1) – Internal review of administrative acts – Limitation to measures of individual application – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1056 – Extension of the approval period of the active substance ‘glyphosate’ – Application for internal review – Measure of general application – Dismissal.#Case C-784/18 P.cjeu_case · 3 сентября 2020 г.
33455Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#Mellifera eV, Vereinigung für wesensgemäße Bienenhaltung v European Commission.#Appeal – Aarhus Convention – Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Article 2(1)(g) and Article 10(1) – Internal review of administrative acts – Limitation to measures of individual application – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1056 – Extension of the approval period of the active substance ‘glyphosate’ – Application for internal review – Measure of general application – Dismissal.#Case C-784/18 P.cjeu_case · 3 сентября 2020 г.
33456Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 3 septembre 2020.#République tchèque contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonds européen agricole de garantie (FEAGA) et Fonds européen agricole pour le développement rural (Feader) – Dépenses exclues du financement de l’Union européenne – Dépenses effectuées par la République tchèque – Règlement (CE) no 555/2008 – Articles 19 et 77 – Marchés vitivinicoles – Règlement (CE) no 1122/2009 – Article 33 – Soutien au développement rural – Aides à la surface – Aides directes découplées – Contrôles en matière de conditionnalité – Contrôles sur place traditionnels et par télédétection – Charge de la preuve – Corrections ponctuelle et forfaitaire – Doutes sur l’efficacité des contrôles – Analyse des risques – Carences.#Affaire C-742/18 P.cjeu_case · 3 сентября 2020 г.
33457Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#Czech Republic v European Commission.#Appeal – European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Expenditure excluded from EU financing – Expenditure incurred by the Czech Republic – Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 – Articles 19 and 77 – Wine market – Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 – Article 33 – Support for rural development – Area-related aid – Decoupled direct aid – Cross-compliance checks – Traditional on-the-spot checks and on-the-spot checks by remote sensing – Burden of proof – One-off and flat-rate corrections – Doubts concerning the effectiveness of the checks – Risk analysis – Deficiencies.#Case C-742/18 P.cjeu_case · 3 сентября 2020 г.
33458Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 3 septembre 2020.#Vivendi SA contre Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Communications électroniques – Article 11, paragraphe 2, de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Liberté et pluralisme des médias – Liberté d’établissement – Article 49 TFUE – Directive 2002/21/CE – Articles 15 et 16 – Réglementation nationale interdisant à une entreprise disposant d’une puissance significative sur le marché dans un secteur de prendre une “dimension économique importante” dans un autre secteur – Calcul des recettes réalisées dans le secteur des communications électroniques et dans le secteur des médias – Définition du secteur des communications électroniques – Limitation aux marchés ayant fait l’objet d’une régulation ex ante – Prise en considération des recettes des sociétés liées – Fixation d’un seuil de recettes différent pour les sociétés actives dans le secteur des communications électroniques.#Affaire C-719/18.cjeu_case · 3 сентября 2020 г.
33459Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#Vivendi SA v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications – Article 11(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Freedom and pluralism of the media – Freedom of establishment – Article 49 TFEU – Directive 2002/21/EC – Articles 15 and 16 – National legislation prohibiting an undertaking which has significant market power in a sector from establishing a ‘significant economic dimension’ in another sector – Calculation of revenues received in the electronic communications sector and the media sector – Definition of the electronic communications sector – Restriction to markets which have been subject to ex ante regulation – Account taken of the income of affiliated companies – Fixing of different income thresholds for undertakings active in the electronic communications sector.#Case C-719/18.cjeu_case · 3 сентября 2020 г.
33460Case C-817/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 September 2020 — Vereniging tot Behoud van Natuurmonumenten in Nederland and Others v European Commission and Others (Appeal — State aid — Aid scheme relating to the subsidised acquisition or free granting of nature land — Preliminary examination procedure — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Article 1(h) — Concept of ‘serious difficulties’ — Service of general economic interest — Secondary activities — Related actions)cjeu_case · 3 сентября 2020 г.