Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
33421

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 3 septembre 2020.#Profi Credit Polska SA e.a. contre QJ e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 93/13/CEE – Article 1er, paragraphe 2 – Champ d’application – Disposition nationale prévoyant le montant maximal des coûts du crédit hors intérêts – Article 3, paragraphe 1 – Clause contractuelle répercutant, sur le consommateur, des coûts de l’activité économique du prêteur – Déséquilibre significatif entre les droits et les obligations des parties – Article 4, paragraphe 2 – Obligation de rédaction claire et compréhensible des clauses contractuelles – Clauses contractuelles ne spécifiant pas les services qu’elles visent à rémunérer – Directive 2008/48/CE – Article 3, sous g) – Législation nationale établissant un mode de calcul du montant maximal du coût du crédit hors intérêts pouvant être mis à charge du consommateur.#Affaires jointes C-84/19, C-222/19 et C-252/19.

cjeu_case ·
33422

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#Profi Credit Polska S.A. and Others v QJ and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy Szczecin – Prawobrzeże i Zachód w Szczecinie and the Sąd Rejonowy w Opatowie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 1(2) – Scope – National provision providing for the maximum amount of non-interest credit costs – Article 3(1) – Contractual term passing on to the consumer costs of the lender’s business activity – Significant imbalance between the rights and obligations of the parties – Article 4(2) – Obligation to draft contract terms in plain intelligible language – Contractual terms which do not specify the services for which remuneration is sought – Directive 2008/48/EC – Article 3(g) – National legislation laying down a method of calculating the maximum non-interest credit cost which may be charged to the consumer.#Joined Cases C-84/19, C-222/19 and C-252/19.

cjeu_case ·
33423

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 3 septembre 2020.#Procédures pénales contre XN e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Déchets – Transferts – Règlement (CE) no 1013/2006 – Déchets soumis à la procédure de notification et de consentement écrits préalables – Article 1er, paragraphe 3 – Transferts soumis à des exigences conditionnant l’agrément – Directive 2008/98/CE – Article 5, paragraphe 1 – Notion de “sous-produits” – Règlement (CE) no 1069/2009 – Article 3, point 1 – Notion de “sous-produits animaux” – Transferts d’un mélange de sous-produits animaux et d’autres matières.#Affaires jointes C-21/19 à C-23/19.

cjeu_case ·
33424

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 September 2020.#Criminal proceedings against XN and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Waste – Shipments – Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 – Waste subject to the prior written notification and consent procedure – Article 1(3) – Shipments subject to approval requirements – Directive 2008/98/EC – Article 5(1) – Concept of ‘by-products’ – Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 – Article 3, point 1 – Concept of ‘animal by-products’ – Shipments of a mixture of animal by-products and other material.#Joined Cases C-21/19 to C-23/19.

cjeu_case ·
33425

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 3 September 2020.#BY v CX.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea Hovrätt – Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Information society – Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights – Article 3(1) – Communication to the public – Notion of ‘public’ – Transmission by electronic means to a court of a protected work as evidence in court proceedings.#Case C-637/19.

cjeu_case ·
33426

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 3 September 2020.#Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v D.-H. T. as liquidator of J & S Service UG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 23 – Restrictions to the data subject’s rights – Significant financial interest – Enforcement of civil law claims – National legislation referring to the provisions of EU law – Tax data concerning a legal person – Lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-620/19.

cjeu_case ·
33427

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 3 September 2020.#M.S. and Others v Minister for Justice and Equality.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Irlande).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Procedure for granting and withdrawing refugee status – Directive 2005/85/EC – Article 25(2) – Grounds for inadmissibility – Rejection by one Member State of an application for international protection as inadmissible due to the earlier grant to the applicant of subsidiary protection in another Member State – Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013.#Case C-616/19.

cjeu_case ·
33428

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 3 September 2020.#Gmina Wrocław v Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny we Wrocławiu.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2(1)(a) – Article 9(1) – Article 13(1) – Article 14(1) and (2)(a) – Concept of ‘supply of goods’ – Transformation of the right of perpetual usufruct into full immovable property ownership rights by operation of law – Municipality collecting fees for the transformation – Concept of ‘compensation’ – Concept of ‘taxable person acting as such’ – Exception – Bodies governed by public law which engage in activities or transactions as public authorities.#Case C-604/19.

cjeu_case ·
33429

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 3 September 2020.#Recylex SA and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for car battery recycling – 2006 Leniency Notice – Point 26 – Partial immunity – Additional facts increasing the gravity or the duration of the infringement – Elements known to the European Commission – Reduction of the amount of the fine – Ranking for the purposes of the reduction – Chronological order.#Case C-563/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
33430

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 3 September 2020.#LH v Profi Credit Slovakia s.r.o.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2008/48/EC – Credit agreements for consumers – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair contract terms – Payment made under an unlawful term – Unjust enrichment of the lender – Right to restitution time-barred – Principles of Union law – Principle of effectiveness – Article 10(2) of Directive 2008/48 – Information to be included in a credit agreement – Elimination of certain national requirements on the basis of the case-law of the Court – Interpretation of the old version of the national legislation in accordance with that case-law – Temporal effects.#Case C-485/19.

cjeu_case ·
33432

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 3 September 2020.#French Republic v European Commission.#Appeal – European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/2014 – Expenditure excluded from EU financing – Expenditure incurred by the French Republic – 100% flat-rate correction – Proportionality – European Commission Guidelines on the calculation of the financial corrections in the framework of the conformity and financial clearance of accounts procedures.#Case C-404/19 P.

cjeu_case ·
33433

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 3 September 2020.#K.S. and M.H.K. v The International Protection Appeals Tribunal and Others and R.A.T. and D.S. v Minister for Justice and Equality.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) and International Protection Appeals Tribunal.#References for a preliminary ruling – Border controls, asylum and immigration – International protection – Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection – Directive 2013/33/EU – Third-country national who has travelled from one Member State of the European Union to another, but who has applied for international protection only in the latter Member State – Decision to transfer to the first Member State – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Access to the labour market as an applicant for international protection.#Joined Cases C-322/19 and C-385/19.

cjeu_case ·
33434

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 3 September 2020.#European Commission v Republic of Slovenia.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 343 TFEU – Privileges and immunities of the European Union – Statute of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) and of the European Central Bank (ECB) – Article 39 – Privileges and immunities of the ECB – Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Union – Articles 2, 18 and 22 – Principle of the inviolability of the archives of the ECB – Seizure of documents at the premises of the Central Bank of Slovenia – Documents connected to the performance of the tasks of the ESCB and of the Eurosystem – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation.#Case C-316/19.

cjeu_case ·
33436

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 3 September 2020.#Consiliul Concurenţei v Whiteland Import Export SRL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Penalties imposed by the national competition authority – Limitation period – Actions interrupting the limitation period – National legislation precluding, after the initiation of an investigation, the possibility that subsequent action for the purpose of proceedings or investigation may interrupt the new limitation period – Principle that national law must be interpreted in conformity with EU law – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 25(3) – Scope – Article 4(3) TEU – Article 101 TFEU – Principle of effectiveness.#Case C-308/19.

cjeu_case ·
33438

Case C-611/19: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — Crewprint Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Principles of fiscal neutrality, of effectiveness and of proportionality — Right to VAT deduction — Refusal — Fraud — Proof — Chain of subcontractors)

cjeu_case ·
33439

Case C-610/19: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — Vikingo Fővállalkozó Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 168, 178, 220 and 226 — Principles of fiscal neutrality, of effectiveness and of proportionality — Right to deduct VAT — Refusal — Conditions for the existence of a supply of goods — Evasion — Proof — Penalty — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to an effective judicial remedy)

cjeu_case ·
33440

Case C-539/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I — Germany) — Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV v Telefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Roaming on public mobile communications networks within the European Union — Regulation (EU) No 531/2012 — Article 6a — Article 6e(3) — Roaming provider required to automatically apply the regulated roaming tariff — Application to consumer having opted for a specific roaming tariff prior to the entry into force of Regulation (EU) No 531/2012)

cjeu_case ·