33341Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Kerkosand spol. s r. o. v European Commission.#State aid – Aid for an investment project in western Slovakia – Regional investment aid – Dismissal of a complaint – Decision not to raise any objections – Conditions for exemption – Article 14 of Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 – Scope of the Commission’s supervisory power – Guidelines on regional State aid for 2014-2020 – Concept of SME – Article 3(2) and (3) of Annex I to Regulation No 651/2014 – Data used for the staff headcount and the financial amounts and reference period – Article 4 of Annex I to Regulation No 651/2014 – Doubts as to the compatibility of the aid with the internal market – Article 4(4) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Serious difficulties.#Case T-745/17.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.
33342Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Kerkosand spol. s r. o. v European Commission.#State aid – Aid for an investment project in western Slovakia – Regional investment aid – Dismissal of a complaint – Decision not to raise any objections – Conditions for exemption – Article 14 of Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 – Scope of the Commission’s supervisory power – Guidelines on regional State aid for 2014-2020 – Concept of SME – Article 3(2) and (3) of Annex I to Regulation No 651/2014 – Data used for the staff headcount and the financial amounts and reference period – Article 4 of Annex I to Regulation No 651/2014 – Doubts as to the compatibility of the aid with the internal market – Article 4(4) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Serious difficulties.#Case T-745/17.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.
33343Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 September 2020.#Republic of Slovenia v European Commission.#Agriculture – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Designations of origin in the wine sector – Wine labelling – Use of the name of a wine grape variety which contains or consists of a protected designation of origin – Prohibition – Exception – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1353 – Inclusion of the name of the ‘Teran’ wine grape variety in the list set out in Part A of Annex XV to Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 – Retroactive effect from the date of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union – Slovenian protected designation of origin ‘Teran’ – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Proportionality – Right to property – Act concerning the conditions of accession of Croatia to the European Union – Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making – Institutional balance.#Case T-626/17.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.
33344Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 September 2020.#Republic of Slovenia v European Commission.#Agriculture – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Designations of origin in the wine sector – Wine labelling – Use of the name of a wine grape variety which contains or consists of a protected designation of origin – Prohibition – Exception – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1353 – Inclusion of the name of the ‘Teran’ wine grape variety in the list set out in Part A of Annex XV to Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 – Retroactive effect from the date of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union – Slovenian protected designation of origin ‘Teran’ – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Proportionality – Right to property – Act concerning the conditions of accession of Croatia to the European Union – Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making – Institutional balance.#Case T-626/17.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.
33345Case T-745/17: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Kerkosand v Commission (State aid — Aid for an investment project in western Slovakia — Regional investment aid — Rejection of a complaint — Decision not to raise any objections — Conditions for exemption — Article 14 of Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 — Scope of the Commission’s supervisory power — Guidelines on regional State aid for 2014-2020 — Concept of SME — Article 3(2) and (3) of Annex I to Regulation No 651/2014 — Data used for the staff headcount and the financial amounts and reference period — Article 4 of Annex I to Regulation No 651/2014 — Doubts as to the compatibility of the aid with the internal market — Article 4(4) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Serious difficulties)cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.
33346Case T-626/17: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Slovenia v Commission (Agriculture — Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 — Designations of origin in the wine sector — Wine labelling — Use of the name of a wine grape variety which contains or consists of a protected designation of origin — Prohibition — Derogation — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1353 — Inclusion of the name of the wine grape variety ‘teran’ in the list set out in Part A of Annex XV to Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 — Retroactive effect from the date of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union — Slovenian protected designation of origin ‘Teran’ — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Right to property — Act concerning the conditions of accession of Croatia to the European Union — Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making — Institutional balance)cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.
33347Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Italian Republic v European Commission.#Rules on languages – Notice of open competition for the recruitment of administrators in the field of audit – Knowledge of languages – Limitation of the choice of the second competition language to English, French and German – Language of communication – Regulation No 1 – Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations – Discrimination based on language – Justification – Interests of the service – Proportionality.#Case T-437/16.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.
33348Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Italian Republic v European Commission.#Rules on languages – Notice of open competition for the recruitment of administrators in the field of audit – Knowledge of languages – Limitation of the choice of the second competition language to English, French and German – Language of communication – Regulation No 1 – Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations – Discrimination based on language – Justification – Interests of the service – Proportionality.#Case T-437/16.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.
33349Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Kingdom of Spain and Italian Republic v European Commission.#Language regime – Notice of open competitions for the recruitment of Investigators and Team leaders – Language skills – Limitation of the choice of second language in the competitions to German, English and French – Eliminatory language-comprehension test in English – Language of communication – Regulation No 1 – Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations – Discrimination based on language – Justification – Interests of the service – Proportionality.#Case T-401/16.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.
33350Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Kingdom of Spain and Italian Republic v European Commission.#Language regime – Notice of open competitions for the recruitment of Investigators and Team leaders – Language skills – Limitation of the choice of second language in the competitions to German, English and French – Eliminatory language-comprehension test in English – Language of communication – Regulation No 1 – Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations – Discrimination based on language – Justification – Interests of the service – Proportionality.#Case T-401/16 and T-443/16.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.
33351Case T-437/16: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Italy v Commission (Language regime — Notice of open competition for the recruitment of administrators in the field of audit — Language knowledge — Limitation of the choice of second language to German, English and French — Language for communication — Regulation No 1 — Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations — Discrimination on grounds of language — Justification — Interest of the service — Proportionality)cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.
33352Joined Cases T-401/16 and T-443/16: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Spain and Italy v Commission (Language regime — Notice of open competitions for the recruitment of Investigators and Team leaders — Language skills — Limitation of the choice of second language in the competitions to German, English and French — Eliminatory language-comprehension test in English — Language of communication — Regulation No 1 — Article 1d(1), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations — Discrimination based on language — Justification — Interests of the service — Proportionality)cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.
33353Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#International Management Group (IMG) v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Development cooperation – Implementation of the EU budget under indirect management – Decision suspending the applicant’s ability to conclude new delegation agreements for indirect management with the Commission – Unlawfulness – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Application for injunctive relief – Late submission of application – Modification of the nature of the reparation sought – Inadmissibility.#Case T-381/15 RENV.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.
33354Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#International Management Group (IMG) v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Development cooperation – Implementation of the EU budget under indirect management – Decision suspending the applicant’s ability to conclude new delegation agreements for indirect management with the Commission – Unlawfulness – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Application for injunctive relief – Late submission of application – Modification of the nature of the reparation sought – Inadmissibility.#Case T-381/15 RENV.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.
33355Case T-381/15 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — IMG v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Development cooperation — Implementation of the EU budget under indirect management — Decision suspending the applicant’s ability to conclude new delegation agreements for indirect management with the Commission — Unlawfulness — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals — Application for injunctive relief — Late submission of application — Modification of the nature of the reparation sought — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.
33356Case T-561/20: Action brought on 8 September 2020 — Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe v EUIPO — Vieta Audio (Vita)cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2020 г.
33357Case T-558/20: Action brought on 8 September 2020 — Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe v EUIPO — Huawei Technologies (GT10)cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2020 г.
33358Case T-554/20: Action brought on 8 September 2020 — Pollinis France v Commissioncjeu_case · 8 сентября 2020 г.
33359Case T-334/20: Order of the General Court of 8 September 2020 — KH v EEAScjeu_case · 8 сентября 2020 г.
33360Case C-425/20 P: Appeal brought on 8 September 2020 by Welmax + sp. z o. o. sp.k. against the judgment delivered on 8 July 2020 in Case T-305/19 Welmax + v EUIPO — Valmex Medical Imaging (welmax)cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2020 г.