33261Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 10 September 2020.#Wikingerhof GmbH & Co. KG v Booking.com BV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Jurisdiction – Article 7, points 1 and 2 – Special jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict – Action seeking an injunction against commercial practices considered to be contrary to competition law – Allegation of abuse of a dominant position occurring in commercial practices covered by contractual provisions – Online accommodation booking platform booking.com.#Case C-59/19.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2020 г.
33262Case C-738/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam — Netherlands) — A v B, C (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Annex, point 1(e) — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Social housing — Obligation of residence and prohibition on subletting the property — Article 3(1) and (3) — Article 4(1) — Assessment of whether penalty clauses are unfair — Criteria)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2020 г.
33263Case C-509/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München — Germany) — BMW Bayerische Motorenwerke AG v Hauptzollamt München (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs Union — Union Customs Code — Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 — Article 71(1)(b) — Customs value — Imports of electronic products equipped with software)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2020 г.
33264Case C-498/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 September 2020 — Romania v European Commission (Appeal — European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF), the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) — Decision of the European Commission excluding expenditure from EU financing — Notification to the addressee — Error in the printing of the annex — Publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union — Time limit for filing appeal — Point from which time starts to run — Lateness — Principle of legal certainty — Observance of the adversarial principle)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2020 г.
33265Case C-386/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 September 2020 — Hamas v Council of the European Union, European Commission (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Fight against terrorism — Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities — Freezing of funds — Common Position 2001/931/CFSP — Article 1(4) and (6) — Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 — Article 2(3) — Retention of an organisation on the list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts — Conditions — Competent authority equivalent to a judicial authority — Sentencing decision — Ongoing risk of involvement in terrorist activities — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2020 г.
33266Case C-367/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Državna revizijska komisija za revizijo postopkov oddaje javnih naročil — Slovenia) — Tax-Fin-Lex d.o.o. v Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public service contracts — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 2(1)(5) — Concept of ‘public contract’ — Concept of ‘contract for pecuniary interest’ — Tenderer’s bid at a price of EUR 0.00 — Rejection of the tender — Article 69 — Abnormally low tender)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2020 г.
33267Case C-363/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Patent- och marknadsdomstolen vid Stockholms tingsrätt — Sweden) — Konsumentombudsmannen v Mezina AB (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Food safety — Nutritional and health claims concerning foodstuffs — Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 — Articles 5 and 6 — Scientific substantiation for claims — Generally accepted scientific evidence — Article 10(1) — Article 28(5) — Transitional arrangements — Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market — Directive 2005/29/EC — Article 3(4) — Relationship between the provisions of Directive 2005/29 and other EU rules regulating specific aspects of unfair commercial practices)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2020 г.
33268Case C-122/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 September 2020 — Hamas v Council of the European Union, French Republic, European Commission (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Fight against terrorism — Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities — Freezing of funds — Common Position 2001/931/CFSP — Article 1(4) and (6) — Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 — Article 2(3) — Retention of an organisation on the list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts — Conditions — Competent authority equivalent to a judicial authority — Sentencing decision — Ongoing risk of involvement in terrorist activities — Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds — Obligation to state reasons — Right to effective judicial protection)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2020 г.
33269Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 September 2020.#Crocs, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Declaration of invalidity – Appeal which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate – Costs.#Case C-320/18 P.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2020 г.
33270Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 September 2020.#Crocs, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Declaration of invalidity – Appeal which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate – Costs.#Case C-320/18 P.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2020 г.
33271Case C-320/18 P: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 September 2020 — Crocs Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Gifi Diffusion (Appeal — Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Declaration of invalidity — Appeal which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate — Costs)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2020 г.
33272Case T-563/20: Action brought on 9 September 2020 — Satabank v ECBcjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.
33273Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Anne-Marie Klose v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU figurative mark representing three coloured segments in a rectangle – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-81/20.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.
33274Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Anne-Marie Klose v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU figurative mark representing three coloured segments in a rectangle – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-81/20.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.
33275Case T-81/20: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2020 — Klose v EUIPO (Representation of three coloured segments in a rectangle) (EU trade mark — Application for an EU figurative mark representing three coloured segments in a rectangle — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.
33276Case C-420/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 9 September 2020 — criminal proceedings against HNcjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.
33277Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#International Management Group (IMG) v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Development cooperation – Implementing the EU budget in indirect management – Execution of a judgment of the Court of Justice – Commission letter requesting that certain documents be provided – Act not open to challenge – Preparatory measure – Inadmissibility – Action for damages – Close link with the claim for annulment – Lis pendens – Inadmissibility – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-645/19.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.
33278Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#International Management Group (IMG) v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Development cooperation – Implementing the EU budget in indirect management – Execution of a judgment of the Court of Justice – Commission letter requesting that certain documents be provided – Act not open to challenge – Preparatory measure – Inadmissibility – Action for damages – Close link with the claim for annulment – Lis pendens – Inadmissibility – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-645/19.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.
33279Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Sumol + Compal Marcas, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Dr. Jacob’s essentials – Earlier international word mark COMPAL ESSENCIAL – Earlier national and international figurative marks FRUTA essencial, COMPAL essencial and Compal FRUTA essencial – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-879/19.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.
33280Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Sumol + Compal Marcas, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark Dr. Jacob’s essentials – Earlier international word mark COMPAL ESSENCIAL – Earlier national and international figurative marks FRUTA essencial, COMPAL essencial and Compal FRUTA essencial – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-879/19.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2020 г.