33101Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 September 2020 (Extracts).#CEDC International sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU three-dimensional mark – Shape of a blade of grass in a bottle – Earlier three-dimensional national mark – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 15(1) and Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 18(1) and Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Nature of use – Alteration of distinctive character – Use in conjunction with other marks – Scope of the protection – Requirement for clarity and precision – Requirement for the description and the representation to align with one another – Decision taken following annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court – Reference to the ground of an earlier annulled decision – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-796/16.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33102Case T-251/16: Order of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Director-General of OLAF v Commissioncjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33103Case T-796/16: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — CEDC International v EUIPO — Underberg (Shape of a blade of grass in a bottle) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU three-dimensional mark — Shape of a blade of grass in a bottle — Earlier three-dimensional national mark — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 15(1) and Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 18(1) and Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Nature of use — Alteration of distinctive character — Use in conjunction with other marks — Scope of the protection — Requirement for clarity and precision — Requirement for the description and the representation to align with one another — Decision taken following annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court — Reference to the grounds of an earlier annulled decision — Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33104Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 September 2020.#Kingdom of Spain and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Aid granted by the Spanish authorities to certain economic interest groupings (EIGs) and their investors – Tax provisions applicable to certain finance lease agreements for the acquisition of vessels (Spanish Tax Lease System) – Decision declaring the aid incompatible in part with the internal market and ordering its partial recovery – Selectivity – Obligation to state reasons – Recovery of aid – Equal treatment – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty.#Joined Cases T-515/13 RENV and T-719/13 RENV.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33105Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 September 2020.#Kingdom of Spain and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Aid granted by the Spanish authorities to certain economic interest groupings (EIGs) and their investors – Tax provisions applicable to certain finance lease agreements for the acquisition of vessels (Spanish Tax Lease System) – Decision declaring the aid incompatible in part with the internal market and ordering its partial recovery – Selectivity – Obligation to state reasons – Recovery of aid – Equal treatment – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty.#Joined Cases T-515/13 RENV and T-719/13 RENV.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33106Joined Cases T-515/13 RENV and T-719/13 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Spain and Others v Commission (State aid — Aid granted by the Spanish authorities to certain economic interest groupings (EIG) and their investors — Tax regime applicable to certain finance lease agreements for the purchase of ships (Spanish tax lease system) — Decision declaring the aid partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery in part — Selective nature — Obligation to state reasons — Recovery of the aid — Equal treatment — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty)cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33107Case T-599/20: Action brought on 22 September 2020 — YG v Commissioncjeu_case · 22 сентября 2020 г.
33108Case C-509/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 22 September 2020 — M.F. v J.M.cjeu_case · 22 сентября 2020 г.
33109Case C-449/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 22 September 2020 — Real Vida Seguros, S. A. v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneiracjeu_case · 22 сентября 2020 г.
33110Case C-448/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 22 September 2020 — Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas IP (IFAP) v BD, Autoridade Tributaria e Aduaneiracjeu_case · 22 сентября 2020 г.
33111Case C-447/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 22 September 2020 — Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas IP (IFAP) v LMcjeu_case · 22 сентября 2020 г.
33112Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 22 September 2020.#John Dalli v European Commission.#Appeal – Action for damages – Non-contractual liability of the European Union – Allegedly illegal conduct of the European Commission and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Termination of office of a Member of the Commission – Procedural rules governing the OLAF investigation – Opening of an investigation – Right to be heard – OLAF Supervisory Committee – Presumption of innocence – Assessment of the alleged damage.#Case C-615/19 P.cjeu_case · 22 сентября 2020 г.
33113Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 September 2020.#Cali Apartments SCI and HX v Procureur général près la cour d'appel de Paris and Ville de Paris.#References for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2006/123/EC – Scope – Repeated short-term letting of furnished premises to a transient clientele which does not take up residence there – National legislation imposing a prior authorisation scheme for certain specific municipalities and making those municipalities responsible for defining the conditions for granting the authorisations provided for by that scheme – Article 4(6) – Concept of ‘authorisation scheme’ – Article 9 – Justification – Insufficient supply of affordable long-term rental housing – Proportionality – Article 10 – Requirements relating to the conditions for granting authorisations.#Joined Cases C-724/18 and C-727/18.cjeu_case · 22 сентября 2020 г.
33114Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 September 2020.#Cali Apartments SCI and HX v Procureur général près la cour d'appel de Paris and Ville de Paris.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France).#References for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2006/123/EC – Scope – Repeated short-term letting of furnished premises to a transient clientele which does not take up residence there – National legislation imposing a prior authorisation scheme for certain specific municipalities and making those municipalities responsible for defining the conditions for granting the authorisations provided for by that scheme – Article 4(6) – Concept of ‘authorisation scheme’ – Article 9 – Justification – Insufficient supply of affordable long-term rental housing – Proportionality – Article 10 – Requirements relating to the conditions for granting authorisations.#Joined Cases C-724/18 and C-727/18.cjeu_case · 22 сентября 2020 г.
33115Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 September 2020.#Republic of Austria v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Articles 11 and 194 TFEU – Article 1, Article 2(c) and Article 106a(3) of the Euratom Treaty – Planned aid for Hinkley Point C nuclear power station (United Kingdom) – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Objective of common interest – Environmental objectives of the European Union – Principle of protection of the environment, ‘polluter pays’ principle, precautionary principle and principle of sustainability – Determination of the economic activity concerned – Market failure – Proportionality of the aid – Operating or investment aid – Determination of the aid elements – Guarantee Notice.#Case C-594/18 P.cjeu_case · 22 сентября 2020 г.
33116Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 September 2020.#Republic of Austria v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Articles 11 and 194 TFEU – Article 1, Article 2(c) and Article 106a(3) of the Euratom Treaty – Planned aid for Hinkley Point C nuclear power station (United Kingdom) – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Objective of common interest – Environmental objectives of the European Union – Principle of protection of the environment, ‘polluter pays’ principle, precautionary principle and principle of sustainability – Determination of the economic activity concerned – Market failure – Proportionality of the aid – Operating or investment aid – Determination of the aid elements – Guarantee Notice.#Case C-594/18 P.cjeu_case · 22 сентября 2020 г.
33117Joined Cases C-724/18 and C-727/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 September 2020 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Cali Apartments SCI (C-724/18) and HX (C-727/18) v Procureur général près la cour d’appel de Paris and Ville de Paris (References for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2006/123/EC — Scope — Repeated short-term letting of furnished premises to a transient clientele which does not take up residence there — National legislation imposing a prior authorisation scheme for certain specific municipalities and making those municipalities responsible for defining the conditions for granting the authorisations provided for by that scheme — Article 4(6) — Concept of ‘authorisation scheme’ — Article 9 — Justification — Insufficient supply of affordable long-term rental housing — Proportionality — Article 10 — Requirements relating to the conditions for granting authorisations)cjeu_case · 22 сентября 2020 г.
33118Case C-594/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 September 2020 — Republic of Austria v European Commission and Others (Appeal — State aid — Article 107(3)(c) TFEU — Articles 11 and 194 TFEU — Article 1, Article 2(c) and Article 106a(3) of the Euratom Treaty — Planned aid for Hinkley Point C nuclear power station (United Kingdom) — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Objective of common interest — Environmental objectives of the European Union — Principle of protection of the environment, ‘polluter pays’ principle, precautionary principle and principle of sustainability — Determination of the economic activity concerned — Market failure — Proportionality of the aid — Operating or investment aid — Determination of the aid elements — Guarantee Notice)cjeu_case · 22 сентября 2020 г.
33119Case T-581/20: Action brought on 21 September 2020 — YP v Commissioncjeu_case · 21 сентября 2020 г.
33120Case T-579/20: Action brought on 21 September 2020 — Genekam Biotechnology v Commissioncjeu_case · 21 сентября 2020 г.