33021Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 September 2020 (Extracts).#Medac Gesellschaft für klinische Spezialpräparate mbH v European Commission.#Medicinal products for human use – Orphan medicinal products – Application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Trecondi-treosulfan – Decision to remove a medicinal product from the Register of Orphan Medicinal Products – Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 – Concept of ‘satisfactory method’ – Article 5(12)(b) of Regulation No 141/2000 – Error of law.#Case T-549/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33022Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 September 2020 (Extracts).#Medac Gesellschaft für klinische Spezialpräparate mbH v European Commission.#Medicinal products for human use – Orphan medicinal products – Application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Trecondi-treosulfan – Decision to remove a medicinal product from the Register of Orphan Medicinal Products – Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 – Concept of ‘satisfactory method’ – Article 5(12)(b) of Regulation No 141/2000 – Error of law.#Case T-549/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33023Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Aldi GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU figurative mark BBQ BARBECUE SEASON – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-522/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33024Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Aldi GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU figurative mark BBQ BARBECUE SEASON – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-522/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33025Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#BASF AS v European Commission.#Medicinal products for human use – Marketing authorisation for medicinal products for human use containing omega-3 acid ethyl esters – Variation of the terms of the authorisation – First paragraph of Article 116 of Directive 2001/83/EC – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-472/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33026Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#BASF AS v European Commission.#Medicinal products for human use – Marketing authorisation for medicinal products for human use containing omega-3 acid ethyl esters – Variation of the terms of the authorisation – First paragraph of Article 116 of Directive 2001/83/EC – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-472/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33027Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Brillux GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark Freude an Farbe – Earlier EU figurative mark Glemadur Freude an Farbe – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)).#Case T-402/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33028Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Brillux GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark Freude an Farbe – Earlier EU figurative mark Glemadur Freude an Farbe – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)).#Case T-402/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33029Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Brillux GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark Freude an Farbe in yellow, orange, red, pink, violet, blue, turquoise, dark green, light green and charcoal – Earlier figurative EU trade mark Glemadur Freude an Farbe – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-401/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33030Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Brillux GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark Freude an Farbe in yellow, orange, red, pink, violet, blue, turquoise, dark green, light green and charcoal – Earlier figurative EU trade mark Glemadur Freude an Farbe – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-401/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33031Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Kingdom of Spain v European Commission.#External relations – Technical cooperation – Electronic communications – Regulation (EU) 2018/1971 – Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications – Article 35(2) of Regulation 2018/1971 – Participation of regulatory authorities of third countries in that body – Participation of the national regulatory authority of Kosovo – Concept of third country – Error of law.#Case T-370/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33032Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Kingdom of Spain v European Commission.#External relations – Technical cooperation – Electronic communications – Regulation (EU) 2018/1971 – Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications – Article 35(2) of Regulation 2018/1971 – Participation of regulatory authorities of third countries in that body – Participation of the national regulatory authority of Kosovo – Concept of third country – Error of law.#Case T-370/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33033Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#UE v European Commission.#Civil service – Temporary members of staff – Health problems alleged to be caused by working conditions – Request for recognition of an occupational disease – Article 73 of the Staff Regulations – Right to be heard – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Obligation for the person concerned to be heard before the original decision.#Case T-338/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33034Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#UE v European Commission.#Civil service – Temporary members of staff – Health problems alleged to be caused by working conditions – Request for recognition of an occupational disease – Article 73 of the Staff Regulations – Right to be heard – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Obligation for the person concerned to be heard before the original decision.#Case T-338/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33035Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Fundación Tecnalia Research & Innovation v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Grant agreement concluded in the framework of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – Development and testing of sensor systems for quality and performance control in baking processes – Bread-Guard Project – Overlap of the project with another project financed under the same programme – Changes to the description of the tasks to be undertaken – Loss of the intellectual property rights required for the execution of the project – Overestimation of the number of people needed each month for the project – Beneficiaries’ duty to provide information – Serious misconduct – Termination by the Commission of the grant agreement.#Case T-314/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33036Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Fundación Tecnalia Research & Innovation v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Grant agreement concluded in the framework of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – Development and testing of sensor systems for quality and performance control in baking processes – Bread-Guard Project – Overlap of the project with another project financed under the same programme – Changes to the description of the tasks to be undertaken – Loss of the intellectual property rights required for the execution of the project – Overestimation of the number of people needed each month for the project – Beneficiaries’ duty to provide information – Serious misconduct – Termination by the Commission of the grant agreement.#Case T-314/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33037Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Artem Viktorovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-292/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33038Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Artem Viktorovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-292/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33039Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Viktor Pavlovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-291/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33040Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Viktor Pavlovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-291/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.