33001Case C-452/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 23 September 2020 — PJ v Agenzia delle dogane e dei monopoli — Ufficio dei monopoli per la Toscana and Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanzecjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33002Case C-451/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg (Austria) lodged on 23 September 2020 — Airhelp Limited v Austrian Airlines AGcjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33003Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Tetra GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Wave – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-869/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33004Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Tetra GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Wave – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-869/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33005Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Clouds Sky GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Wi-Fi Powered by The Cloud – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-738/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33006Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Clouds Sky GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Wi-Fi Powered by The Cloud – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-738/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33007Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Huevos Herrera Mejías, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark MontiSierra HUEVOS CON SABOR A CAMPO – Earlier EU and national word marks MONTESIERRA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity between goods – Similarity between signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-737/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33008Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Huevos Herrera Mejías, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark MontiSierra HUEVOS CON SABOR A CAMPO – Earlier EU and national word marks MONTESIERRA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity between goods – Similarity between signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-737/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33009Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Giorgio Basaglia v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents concerning certain projects in the context of the eTEN programme and of the fifth and sixth framework programmes for research and technological development – Restriction of the request for access – Partial refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – Overriding public interest – Obligation to carry out a specific and individual examination.#Case T-727/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33010Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Giorgio Basaglia v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents concerning certain projects in the context of the eTEN programme and of the fifth and sixth framework programmes for research and technological development – Restriction of the request for access – Partial refusal to grant access – Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual – Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party – Overriding public interest – Obligation to carry out a specific and individual examination.#Case T-727/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33011Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Polfarmex S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark SYRENA – Genuine use of the mark – Extent of use – Proof of use – Articles 18(1) and 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Duty to state reasons – First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-677/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33012Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Polfarmex S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark SYRENA – Genuine use of the mark – Extent of use – Proof of use – Articles 18(1) and 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Duty to state reasons – First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-677/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33013Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#FF v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products – Directive 2014/40/EU – Use of a photograph in a library of warnings with pictures to be used for tobacco products – Directive 2014/109/EU – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals.#Case T-654/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33014Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#FF v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products – Directive 2014/40/EU – Use of a photograph in a library of warnings with pictures to be used for tobacco products – Directive 2014/109/EU – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals.#Case T-654/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33015Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Veronese Design Company Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark VERONESE – Earlier EU word mark VERONESE – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-608/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33016Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Veronese Design Company Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark VERONESE – Earlier EU word mark VERONESE – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-608/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33017Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Osório & Gonçalves, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the figurative EU trade mark in.fi.ni.tu.de – Earlier national word mark INFINITE – Admissibility of evidence – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-601/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33018Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Osório & Gonçalves, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the figurative EU trade mark in.fi.ni.tu.de – Earlier national word mark INFINITE – Admissibility of evidence – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-601/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33019Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Seven SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – EU figurative mark 7Seven – No request for renewal of the registration of the trade mark – Cancellation of the mark on expiry of the registration – Article 53 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Application for restitutio in integrum submitted by a licensee – Article 104(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Duty of due care.#Case T-557/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33020Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Seven SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – EU figurative mark 7Seven – No request for renewal of the registration of the trade mark – Cancellation of the mark on expiry of the registration – Article 53 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Application for restitutio in integrum submitted by a licensee – Article 104(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Duty of due care.#Case T-557/19.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.