32981Case C-460/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 24 September 2020 — TU, RE v Google LLCcjeu_case · 24 сентября 2020 г.
32982Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 September 2020.#Criminal proceedings against XC.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Effects of the surrender – Article 27 – Potential prosecutions for other offences – Specialty rule.#Case C-195/20 PPU.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2020 г.
32983Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 September 2020.#Criminal proceedings against XC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Effects of the surrender – Article 27 – Potential prosecutions for other offences – Specialty rule.#Case C-195/20 PPU.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2020 г.
32984Case C-195/20 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Criminal proceedings against XC (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Effects of the surrender — Article 27 — Potential prosecutions for other offences — Specialty rule)cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2020 г.
32985Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 24 septembre 2020.#NMI Technologietransfer GmbH contre EuroNorm GmbH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Aides d’État – Articles 107 et 108 TFUE – Règlement (UE) no 651/2014 – Exemption de certaines catégories d’aides compatibles avec le marché intérieur – Annexe I – Petites et moyennes entreprises (PME) – Définition – Critère d’indépendance – Article 3, paragraphe 1 – Entreprise autonome – Article 3, paragraphe 4 – Exclusion – Contrôle indirect de 25 % du capital ou des droits de vote par des organismes publics – Notions de “contrôle” et d’“organismes publics”.#Affaire C-516/19.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2020 г.
32986Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 September 2020.#NMI Technologietransfer GmbH v EuroNorm GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Articles 107 and 108 TFEU – Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 – Exemption of certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market – Annex I – Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) – Definition – Independence test – Article 3(1) – Autonomous enterprise – Article 3(4) – Not included – Indirect control of 25% of the capital or voting rights by public bodies – Concepts of ‘control’ and ‘public bodies’.#Case C-516/19.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2020 г.
32987Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 24 septembre 2020.#YS contre NK AG.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Égalité de traitement en matière d’emploi et de travail – Directives 2000/78/CE et 2006/54/CE – Champ d’application – Interdiction des discriminations indirectes fondées sur l’âge ou sur le sexe – Justifications – Législation nationale prévoyant un prélèvement sur les pensions versées directement à leurs bénéficiaires par des entreprises contrôlées majoritairement par l’État ainsi que la suppression de l’indexation du montant des pensions – Articles 16, 17, 20 et 21 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Applicabilité – Discrimination fondée sur la fortune – Atteinte à la liberté contractuelle – Violation du droit de propriété – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux – Droit à un recours effectif.#Affaire C-223/19.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2020 г.
32988Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 September 2020.#YS v NK.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Wiener Neustadt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directives 2000/78/EC and 2006/54/EC – Scope – Prohibition of indirect discrimination on grounds of age or sex – Justifications – National legislation providing for an amount to be withheld from pensions paid directly to their recipients by undertakings in which the State has a majority participation and for the cancellation of the indexation of the amount of those pensions – Articles 16, 17, 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Applicability – Discrimination on grounds of property – Infringement of the freedom of contract – Infringement of the right to property – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right to an effective remedy.#Case C-223/19.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2020 г.
32989Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 24 September 2020.#Poste Italiane SpA v Riscossione Sicilia SpA agente riscossione per la provincia di Palermo e delle altre provincie siciliane and Agenzia delle entrate – Riscossione v Poste Italiane SpA.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#References for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Competition – Article 107(1) TFEU – Conditions under which applicable – Article 106(2) TFEU – Services of general economic interest – Management of the post-office account used for collection of the municipal real estate tax – Undertakings benefiting from special or exclusive rights granted by the Member States – Fees set unilaterally by the recipient undertaking – Abuse of dominant position – Article 102 TFEU – Inadmissibility.#Joined Cases C-434/19 and C-435/19.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2020 г.
32990Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 24 September 2020.#Proceedings relating to the extradition of BY.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kammergericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the European Union – Articles 18 and 21 TFEU – Extradition of a Union citizen to a third State – Person acquiring Union citizenship after transferring the centre of his or her interests to the Member State from which extradition is requested – Scope of EU law – Prohibition on extradition applied solely to own nationals – Restriction on freedom of movement – Justification based on the prevention of impunity – Proportionality – Information to the Member State of which the requested person is a national – Obligation on the Member State from which extradition is requested and the Member State of origin to ask the third State requesting extradition to send the criminal investigation file – No obligation.#Case C-398/19.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2020 г.
32991Case C-516/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin — Germany) — NMI Technologietransfer GmbH v EuroNorm GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — State aid — Articles 107 and 108 TFEU — Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 — Exemption of certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market — Annex I — Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) — Definition — Independence test — Article 3(1) — Autonomous enterprise — Article 3(4) — Not included — Indirect control of 25 % of the capital or voting rights by public bodies — Concepts of ‘control’ and ‘public bodies’)cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2020 г.
32992Case C-223/19: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Wiener Neustadt — Austria) — YS v NK (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Equal treatment in employment and occupation — Directives 2000/78/EC and 2006/54/EC — Scope — Prohibition of indirect discrimination on grounds of age or sex — Justifications — National legislation providing for an amount to be withheld from pensions paid directly to their recipients by undertakings in which the State has a majority participation and for the cancellation of the indexation of the amount of those pensions — Articles 16, 17, 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Applicability — Discrimination on grounds of property — Infringement of the freedom of contract — Infringement of the right to property — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Right to an effective remedy)cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2020 г.
32993Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 24 septembre 2020.#Prysmian SpA et Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Concurrence – Ententes – Marché européen des câbles électriques souterrains et sous-marins – Répartition du marché dans le cadre de projets – Infraction unique et continue – Succession d’entités juridiques – Imputabilité du comportement infractionnel – Principe d’égalité de traitement – Dénaturation d’éléments de preuve – Règlement (CE) no 1/2003 – Article 20 – Pouvoirs d’inspection de la Commission européenne en matière d’ententes – Pouvoir de copier des données sans examen préalable et de les examiner ensuite dans les locaux de la Commission – Amendes.#Affaire C-601/18 P.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2020 г.
32994Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2020.#Prysmian SpA and Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Cartels – European market for submarine and underground power cables – Market allocation in connection with projects – Single and continuous infringement – Succession of legal entities – Attributability of unlawful conduct – Principle of equal treatment – Distortion of evidence – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 20 – European Commission’s powers of inspection in cartel proceedings – Power to copy data without a prior examination and to examine the data subsequently at the Commission’s premises – Fines.#Case C-601/18 P.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2020 г.
32995Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 24 September 2020.#Federal Republic of Germany v Esso Raffinage.#Appeal – Registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemicals – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) – Articles 5 and 6 – General obligation to register substances – Articles 41 and 42 – Evaluation of registration dossiers and compliance check of information submitted by registrants – Declaration of non-compliance – Actionable measure – Interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Respective competences of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) and national authorities – Obligation on ECHA to check the compliance of additional information submitted by registrants at its request – ECHA’s power to take an appropriate decision – Article 1 – Objective of protecting human health and the environment – Articles 13 and 25 – Use of animal testing – Promotion of alternative methods.#Case C-471/18 P.cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2020 г.
32996Case C-601/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2020 — Prysmian SpA, Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl v European Commission, The Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Pirelli & C. SpA (Appeal — Competition — Cartels — European mark et for submarine and underground power cables — Market allocation in connection with projects — Single and continuous infringement — Succession of legal entities — Attributability of unlawful conduct — Principle of equal treatment — Distortion of evidence — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 20 — European Commission’s powers of inspection in cartel proceedings — Power to copy data without a prior examination and to examine the data subsequently at the Commission’s premises — Fines)cjeu_case · 24 сентября 2020 г.
32997Case T-583/20: Action brought on 23 September 2020 — Italia Wanbao-ACC v Commissioncjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
32998Case C-455/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 23 September 2020 — Ts.M.Ts., T.M.M.cjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
32999Case C-454/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Lukovit (Bulgaria) lodged on 23 September 2020 — Criminal proceedings against AZcjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.
33000Case C-453/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Úřad pro přístup k dopravní infrastruktuře (Czech Republic) lodged on 23 September 2020 — CityRail a.s. v Správa železnic, státní organizacecjeu_case · 23 сентября 2020 г.