32881Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Ehab Makhlouf v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic – Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria – List of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the appellant’s name – Action for annulment.#Case C-157/19 P.cjeu_case · 1 октября 2020 г.
32882Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Ehab Makhlouf v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic – Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria – List of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the appellant’s name – Action for annulment.#Case C-157/19 P.cjeu_case · 1 октября 2020 г.
32883Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 1 October 2020.#Les Chirurgiens-Dentistes de France and Others v Ministre des Solidarités et de la Santé and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Recognition of professional qualifications – Directive 2005/36/EC – Article 4f(6) – National regulation – Allowing for the possibility of partial access to one of the professions covered by the mechanism for the automatic recognition of professional qualifications.#Case C-940/19.cjeu_case · 1 октября 2020 г.
32884Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 1 October 2020.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland v XT.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection – Standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 12 – Exclusion from being a refugee – Stateless person of Palestinian origin registered with the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) – Conditions to be entitled ipso facto to the benefits of Directive 2011/95 – Cessation of UNRWA protection or assistance.#Case C-507/19.cjeu_case · 1 октября 2020 г.
32885Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 1 October 2020.###cjeu_case · 1 октября 2020 г.
32886Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 1 October 2020.#Federazione Italiana Giuoco Calcio (FIGC) and Consorzio Ge.Se.Av. S. c. arl v De Vellis Servizi Globali Srl.#References for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Public procurement procedure – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 2(1)(4) – Contracting authority – Bodies governed by public law – Concept – National sports federation – Meeting of needs in the general interest – Supervision of the federation’s management by a body governed by public law.#Joined Cases C-155/19 and C-156/19.cjeu_case · 1 октября 2020 г.
32887Case C-654/19: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg — Austria) — FP Passenger Service GmbH v Austrian Airlines AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Compensation of air passengers in the event of long delay of flights — Right to compensation in the event of delay — Length of delay — Time of opening of the aircraft’s doors at destination — Actual arrival time — Scheduled time of arrival — Question on which the Court has already ruled or where the answer to such a question may be clearly deduced from the case-law)cjeu_case · 1 октября 2020 г.
32888Case C-612/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — CC v European Parliament (Appeal — Civil service — Judgment of the General Court ruling on remittal from the General Court after the partial annulment of the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 21 July 2016, CC v Parliament (F-9/12 RENV, EU:F:2016:165) — Recruitment — Open competition EUR/A/151/98 — Errors made by the European Parliament in the management of the list of approved candidates — Material damage — Action to establish non-contractual liability)cjeu_case · 1 октября 2020 г.
32889Case C-603/19: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Špecializovaný trestný súd — Slovakia) — Criminal proceedings against TG, UF (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of the financial interests of the European Union — Article 325 TFEU — Criminal proceedings concerning offences relating to subsidy fraud funded in part from the budget of the European Union — National law not allowing State bodies to obtain, in criminal proceedings, the recovery of subsidies by way of compensation for damage caused by the offences)cjeu_case · 1 октября 2020 г.
32890Case C-526/19: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Entoma SAS v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances, Ministre de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Food safety — Novel foods and novel food ingredients — Regulation (EC) No 258/97 — Article 1(2)(e) — Concept of ‘food ingredients isolated from animals’ — Placing on the market — Whole insects intended for human consumption)cjeu_case · 1 октября 2020 г.
32891Case C-405/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie — Belgium) — Vos Aannemingen BVBA v Belgische Staat (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC — Article 17(2)(a) — Right to deduct input tax — Services also having benefited third parties — Existence of a direct and immediate link with the taxable person’s economic activity — Existence of a direct and immediate link with one or more output transactions)cjeu_case · 1 октября 2020 г.
32892Case C-350/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — Souruh SA v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against certain persons and entities operating in Syria — List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the appellant’s name — Action for annulment)cjeu_case · 1 октября 2020 г.
32893Case C-349/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — Almashreq Investment Fund v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against certain persons and entities operating in Syria — List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the appellant’s name — Action for annulment)cjeu_case · 1 октября 2020 г.
32894Case C-348/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — Drex Technologies SA v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against certain persons and entities operating in Syria — List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the appellant’s name — Action for annulment)cjeu_case · 1 октября 2020 г.
32895Case C-331/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v X (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 98 — Option for the Member States to apply a reduced rate of VAT to certain supplies of goods and services — Annex III, point 1 — Definitions of ‘foodstuffs for human consumption’ and ‘products normally used to supplement foodstuffs or as a substitute for foodstuffs’ — Aphrodisiac products)cjeu_case · 1 октября 2020 г.
32896Case C-261/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — Cham Holding Co. SA v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against certain persons and entities engaged in activities in Syria — List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the appellant’s name — Action for annulment)cjeu_case · 1 октября 2020 г.
32897Case C-260/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — Bena Properties Co. SA v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against certain persons and entities operating in Syria — List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the applicant's name — Action for annulment)cjeu_case · 1 октября 2020 г.
32898Case C-159/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — Syriatel Mobile Telecom (Joint Stock Company) v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against certain persons and entities operating in Syria — List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the applicant's name — Action for annulment)cjeu_case · 1 октября 2020 г.
32899Case C-158/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — Razan Othman v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria — List of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the appellant’s name — Action for annulment)cjeu_case · 1 октября 2020 г.
32900Case C-157/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 October 2020 — Ehab Makhlouf v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against the Syrian Arab Republic — Measures directed against influential businessmen and women engaged in activities in Syria — List of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the appellant’s name — Action for annulment)cjeu_case · 1 октября 2020 г.