Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
32661

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 14 octobre 2020.#JH contre KG.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Directive 2008/104/CE – Travail intérimaire – Article 5, paragraphe 5 – Égalité de traitement – Mesures nécessaires en vue d’éviter le recours abusif au travail intérimaire – Obligation, pour les États membres, d’éviter l’attribution de missions successives – Absence de prévision de limites dans la réglementation nationale – Exigence d’interprétation conforme.#Affaire C-681/18.

cjeu_case ·
32662

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 14 October 2020.#JH v KG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Brescia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2008/104/EC – Temporary agency work – Article 5(5) – Equal treatment – Appropriate measures to prevent misuse of temporary agency work – Obligation for Member States to prevent successive assignments – No limits in national law – Requirement to interpret national law in conformity with EU law.#Case C-681/18.

cjeu_case ·
32664

Case C-681/18: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 14 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Brescia — Italy) — JH v KG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2008/104/EC — Temporary agency work — Article 5(5) — Equal treatment — Appropriate measures to prevent misuse of temporary agency work — Obligation for Member States to prevent successive assignments — No limits in national law — Requirement to interpret national law in conformity with EU law)

cjeu_case ·
32675

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 October 2020.#PN and Others v Centre public d’action sociale d’Anderlecht (CPAS).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Citizenship of the European Union – Right of EU citizens and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of a Member State – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 3 – Beneficiaries – Incorrect transposition – Liability of a Member State in the event of infringement of EU law – Grant of social assistance as compensation for the damage suffered – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-394/19.

cjeu_case ·
32676

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 October 2020.#PN and Others v Centre public d’action sociale d’Anderlecht (CPAS).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail francophone de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Citizenship of the European Union – Right of EU citizens and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of a Member State – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 3 – Beneficiaries – Incorrect transposition – Liability of a Member State in the event of infringement of EU law – Grant of social assistance as compensation for the damage suffered – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-394/19.

cjeu_case ·
32677

Case C-394/19: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail francophone de Bruxelles — Belgium) — PN, QO, RP, SQ, TR v Centre public d’action sociale d’Anderlecht (CPAS) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Citizenship of the European Union — Right of EU citizens and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of a Member State — Directive 2004/38/EC — Article 3 — Beneficiaries — Incorrect transposition — Liability of a Member State in the event of infringement of EU law — Grant of social assistance as compensation for the damage suffered — Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
32678

Case C-621/19: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky — Slovakia) — Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky v Weindel Logistik Service SR spol. s r.o. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 168(e) — Input tax deduction — Use of the goods solely for the purposes of the taxable person’s taxable transactions — Existence of a direct link between the imported goods and the output transaction)

cjeu_case ·