Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
32586

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 October 2020.#Rothenberger AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark ROBOX – Earlier EU word mark OROBOX – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Independent subcategory of goods – Taking into consideration of a descriptive element – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-49/20.

cjeu_case ·
32587

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 October 2020.#Rothenberger AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark ROBOX – Earlier EU word mark OROBOX – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Independent subcategory of goods – Taking into consideration of a descriptive element – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-49/20.

cjeu_case ·
32588

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 October 2020.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark BIOPLAST BIOPLASTICS FOR A BETTER LIFE – Earlier national word mark BIOPLAK – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-2/20.

cjeu_case ·
32589

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 October 2020.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark BIOPLAST BIOPLASTICS FOR A BETTER LIFE – Earlier national word mark BIOPLAK – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-2/20.

cjeu_case ·
32591

Case T-49/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2020 — Rothenberger v EUIPO — Paper Point (ROBOX) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark ROBOX — Earlier EU word mark OROBOX — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Independent subcategory of goods — Taking into consideration of a descriptive element — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
32592

Case T-2/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2020 — Laboratorios Ern v EUIPO — Bio-tec Biologische Naturverpackungen (BIOPLAST BIOPLASTICS FOR A BETTER LIFE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark BIOPLAST BIOPLASTICS FOR A BETTER LIFE — Earlier EU word mark BIOPLAK — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
32594

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2020.#Body Attack Sports Nutrition GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark SAKKATTACK – Earlier international word marks ATTACK and Body Attack and earlier international figurative mark Body Attack SPORTS NUTRITION – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-851/19.

cjeu_case ·
32595

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2020.#Body Attack Sports Nutrition GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark SAKKATTACK – Earlier international word marks ATTACK and Body Attack and earlier international figurative mark Body Attack SPORTS NUTRITION – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-851/19.

cjeu_case ·
32596

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 October 2020.#Dvectis CZ s.r.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered community design representing a support pillow – Earlier Community design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – No different overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-818/19.

cjeu_case ·
32597

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 October 2020.#Dvectis CZ s.r.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered community design representing a support pillow – Earlier Community design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – No different overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-818/19.

cjeu_case ·
32598

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2020.#Body Attack Sports Nutrition GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Sakkattack – Earlier international word marks ATTACK and Body Attack and earlier international figurative mark Body Attack SPORTS NUTRITION – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-788/19.

cjeu_case ·
32599

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2020.#Body Attack Sports Nutrition GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Sakkattack – Earlier international word marks ATTACK and Body Attack and earlier international figurative mark Body Attack SPORTS NUTRITION – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-788/19.

cjeu_case ·