Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
32565

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 October 2020.#Michal Tratkowski v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Civil service – Officials – Internal Competition COM/2/AD 12/18 (AD 12) – Submission of the application using the form provided for that purpose and referred to in Article 2 of Annex III to the Staff Regulations – Request to be admitted to the competition, lodged at the same time and on a separate sheet of paper, to the Appointing Authority – Eligibility conditions – Decision of the selection board to reject the applicant’s application – Rejection by the selection board of the candidate’s request for re-examination due to it being out of time – Decision of the Appointing Authority refusing to grant the applicant’s request to set aside one of the conditions provided for in the notice of competition in order to admit him to the competition – Challenge to the decision of the Appointing Authority and not to that of the selection board – Legal interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Case T-14/20.

cjeu_case ·
32566

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 October 2020.#Michal Tratkowski v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Civil service – Officials – Internal Competition COM/2/AD 12/18 (AD 12) – Submission of the application using the form provided for that purpose and referred to in Article 2 of Annex III to the Staff Regulations – Request to be admitted to the competition, lodged at the same time and on a separate sheet of paper, to the Appointing Authority – Eligibility conditions – Decision of the selection board to reject the applicant’s application – Rejection by the selection board of the candidate’s request for re-examination due to it being out of time – Decision of the Appointing Authority refusing to grant the applicant’s request to set aside one of the conditions provided for in the notice of competition in order to admit him to the competition – Challenge to the decision of the Appointing Authority and not to that of the selection board – Legal interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Case T-14/20.

cjeu_case ·
32567

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 October 2020.#Diego Valiante v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Civil Service – Officials – Internal competition COM/1/AD 10/18 (AD 10) – Submission of the application by means of the form provided for that purpose and referred to in Article 2 of Annex III to the Staff Regulations – Separate application to be admitted to the competition submitted at the same time to the appointing authority – Eligibility criteria – Selection board’s decision rejecting the applicant’s application – Appointing authority’s decision refusing the applicant’s request to disregard one of the conditions set out in the competition notice in order to admit him to the competition – Challenge to the appointing authority’s decision not that of the selection board – Legal interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Case T-13/20.

cjeu_case ·
32568

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 October 2020.#Diego Valiante v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Civil Service – Officials – Internal competition COM/1/AD 10/18 (AD 10) – Submission of the application by means of the form provided for that purpose and referred to in Article 2 of Annex III to the Staff Regulations – Separate application to be admitted to the competition submitted at the same time to the appointing authority – Eligibility criteria – Selection board’s decision rejecting the applicant’s application – Appointing authority’s decision refusing the applicant’s request to disregard one of the conditions set out in the competition notice in order to admit him to the competition – Challenge to the appointing authority’s decision not that of the selection board – Legal interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Case T-13/20.

cjeu_case ·
32571

Case T-14/20: Order of the General Court of 16 October 2020 — Tratkowski v Commission (Action for annulment — Civil service — Officials — Internal Competition COM/2/AD 12/18 (AD 12) — Submission of the application using the form provided for that purpose and referred to in Article 2 of Annex III to the Staff Regulations — Request to be admitted to the competition, lodged at the same time and on a separate sheet of paper, to the Appointing Authority — Eligibility conditions — Decision of the selection board to reject the applicant’s application — Rejection by the selection board of the candidate’s request for re-examination due to it being out of time — Decision of the Appointing Authority refusing to grant the applicant’s request to set aside one of the conditions provided for in the notice of competition in order to admit him to the competition — Challenge to the decision of the Appointing Authority and not to that of the selection board — Legal interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
32572

Case T-13/20: Order of the General Court of 16 October 2020 — Valiante v Commission (Action for annulment — Civil Service — Officials — Internal competition COM/1/AD 10/18 (AD 10) — Submission of the application by means of the form provided for that purpose and referred to in Article 2 of Annex III to the Staff Regulations — Separate application to be admitted to the competition submitted at the same time to the appointing authority — Eligibility criteria — Selection board’s decision rejecting the applicant’s application — Appointing authority’s decision refusing the applicant’s request to disregard one of the conditions set out in the competition notice in order to admit him to the competition — Challenge to the appointing authority’s decision not that of the selection board — Legal interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
32577

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 October 2020.#L. Oliva Torras, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a coupling to hitch refrigeration or air conditioning equipment to a motor vehicle – Ground for invalidity – Failure to comply with the requirements for protection – Articles 4 to 9 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Extent of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal – Pleas in law referring to the grounds of another decision – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-629/19.

cjeu_case ·
32578

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 October 2020.#L. Oliva Torras, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a coupling to hitch refrigeration or air conditioning equipment to a motor vehicle – Ground for invalidity – Failure to comply with the requirements for protection – Articles 4 to 9 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Extent of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal – Pleas in law referring to the grounds of another decision – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-629/19.

cjeu_case ·
32579

Case T-629/19: Order of the General Court of 16 October 2020 — L. Oliva Torras v EUIPO — Mecánica del Frío (Vehicle couplings) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a coupling to hitch refrigeration or air conditioning equipment to a motor vehicle — Ground for invalidity — Failure to comply with the requirements for protection — Articles 4 to 9 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Extent of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal — Pleas in law referring to the grounds of another decision — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·