Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
32441

Case C-112/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Aachen — Germany) — Marvin M. v Kreis Heinsberg (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2006/126/EC — Article 2(1) and Article 11(4) — Driving licence — Mutual recognition — Extent of the obligation to recognise — Driving licence having been the subject of an exchange — Exchange made at a time when the right to drive had been withdrawn by the issuing Member State — Fraud — Refusal to recognise the driving licence issued in the context of the exchange)

cjeu_case ·
32442

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 October 2020.#Pharma Mar, SA v European Commission.#Medicinal products for human use – Application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Aplidin – plitidepsin – Commission decision refusing authorisation – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Scientific evaluation of the risks and benefits of a medicinal product – Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use – Objective impartiality.#Case T-594/18.

cjeu_case ·
32443

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 October 2020.#Pharma Mar, SA v European Commission.#Medicinal products for human use – Application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Aplidin – plitidepsin – Commission decision refusing authorisation – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Scientific evaluation of the risks and benefits of a medicinal product – Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use – Objective impartiality.#Case T-594/18.

cjeu_case ·
32444

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 28 October 2020.#Slim Ben Tijani Ben Haj Hamda Ben Ali v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Tunisia – Measures taken against persons responsible for misappropriation of State funds and associated persons and entities – List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Obligation to adjudicate within a reasonable time – Sufficient factual basis – Time limits for bringing proceedings – Legal aid – Suspensive effect – Admissibility – Conditions.#Case T-151/18.

cjeu_case ·
32445

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 28 October 2020.#Slim Ben Tijani Ben Haj Hamda Ben Ali v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Tunisia – Measures taken against persons responsible for misappropriation of State funds and associated persons and entities – List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Obligation to adjudicate within a reasonable time – Sufficient factual basis – Time limits for bringing proceedings – Legal aid – Suspensive effect – Admissibility – Conditions.#Case T-151/18.

cjeu_case ·
32448

Case T-151/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 October 2020 — Ben Ali v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Tunisia — Measures taken against persons responsible for misappropriation of public funds and associated persons and entities — List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Rights of defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Obligation to adjudicate within a reasonable — Sufficient factual basis — Time limits for bringing proceedings — Legal aid — Suspensive effect — Admissibility — Conditions)

cjeu_case ·
32449

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 October 2020.#Pirelli & C. SpA v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European market for power cables – Market allocation in connection with projects – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 23(2) – Powers of the European Commission in the area of fines – Imputability of the infringement – Presumption of actual exercise of decisive influence – Obligation to state reasons – Fundamental rights – Beneficium ordinis seu excussionis – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case C-611/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
32450

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 October 2020.#Pirelli & C. SpA v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European market for power cables – Market allocation in connection with projects – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 23(2) – Powers of the European Commission in the area of fines – Imputability of the infringement – Presumption of actual exercise of decisive influence – Obligation to state reasons – Fundamental rights – Beneficium ordinis seu excussionis – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case C-611/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
32452

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 October 2020.#Pegaso Srl Servizi Fiduciari and Others v Poste Tutela SpA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Procurement in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 13 – Activities relating to the provision of postal services – Contracting entities – Public undertakings – Admissibility.#Case C-521/18.

cjeu_case ·
32453

Case C-611/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 October 2020 — Pirelli & C. SpA v European Commission, Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for power cables — Market allocation in connection with projects — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 23(2) — Powers of the European Commission in the area of fines — Imputability of the infringement — Presumption of actual exercise of decisive influence — Obligation to state reasons — Fundamental rights — Beneficium ordinis seu excussionis — Unlimited jurisdiction)

cjeu_case ·
32454

Case C-521/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Pegaso Srl Servizi Fiduciari, Sistemi di Sicurezza Srl, YW v Poste Tutela SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Procurement in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors — Directive 2014/25/EU — Article 13 — Activities relating to the provision of postal services — Contracting entities — Public undertakings — Admissibility)

cjeu_case ·