Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
32404

Case C-576/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 October 2020 — Intercept Pharma Ltd, Intercept Pharmaceuticals Inc. v European Medicines Agency (Appeal — Access to documents of the institutions, bodies, offices or agencies of the European Union — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Second indent of Article 4(2) — Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings — First indent of Article 4(2) — Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests — Documents submitted in the context of a marketing authorisation application for a medicinal product for human use — Decision to grant a third party access to the documents)

cjeu_case ·
32405

Case C-243/19: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) — Latvia) — A v Veselības ministrija (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 20(2) — Directive 2011/24/EU — Article 8(1), (5) and (6)(d) — Health insurance — Hospital care provided in a Member State other than the Member State of affiliation — Refusal of prior authorisation — Hospital treatment which can be provided effectively in the Member State of affiliation — Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Difference in treatment based on religion)

cjeu_case ·
32406

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 29 October 2020.#Federazione nazionale delle imprese elettrotecniche ed elettroniche (Anie) and Others and Athesia Energy Srl and Others v Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico and Gestore dei servizi energetici (GSE) SpA.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio.#References for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Articles 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principles of legal certainty and of the protection of legitimate expectations – Energy Charter Treaty – Article 10 – Applicability – Directive 2009/28/EC – Article 3(3)(a) – Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources – Production of electricity from solar photovoltaic installations – Alteration of a support scheme.#Joined Cases C-798/18 and C-799/18.

cjeu_case ·
32409

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 October 2020.#Sarantis Sarantos and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – EU citizenship – Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement – Regulation (EU) 2019/1157 – Action for annulment – Legal standing – Lack of individual concern – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Obligation for a party to be represented by a lawyer – Applicant, also a lawyer, acting in his own name by signing the application himself, without engaging the services of a third-party lawyer to represent him – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-84/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
32410

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 October 2020.#Sarantis Sarantos and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – EU citizenship – Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement – Regulation (EU) 2019/1157 – Action for annulment – Legal standing – Lack of individual concern – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Obligation for a party to be represented by a lawyer – Applicant, also a lawyer, acting in his own name by signing the application himself, without engaging the services of a third-party lawyer to represent him – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-84/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
32414

Case C-84/20 P: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 October 2020 — Archimandritis Sarantis Sarantos, Protopresvyteros Ioannis Fotopoulos, Protopresvyteros Antonios Bousdekis, Protopresvyteros Vasileios Kokolakis, Estia Paterikon Meleton, Christos Papasotiriou, Charalampos Andralis v European Parliament, Council of the European Union (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — EU citizenship — Strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement — Regulation (EU) 2019/1157 — Action for annulment — Legal standing — Lack of individual concern — Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Obligation for a party to be represented by a lawyer — Applicant, also a lawyer, acting in his own name by signing the application himself, without engaging the services of a third-party lawyer to represent him — Appeal manifestly unfounded)

cjeu_case ·
32415

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 October 2020.#Franklin Dehousse v Court of Justice of the European Union.#Access to documents – Court of Justice of the European Union – Documents held by an institution in the exercise of its administrative functions – Article 266 TFEU – Decision adopted to give effect to a judgment of the General Court – Measures necessary to give effect to a judgment delivered in an action for annulment – Presumption of non-existence or non-possession of documents – Plausible explanations making it possible to determine the reasons for the non-existence or non-possession of documents – Obligation to state reasons – Retention of documentation – Principle of good administration.#Case T-857/19.

cjeu_case ·
32416

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 October 2020.#Franklin Dehousse v Court of Justice of the European Union.#Access to documents – Court of Justice of the European Union – Documents held by an institution in the exercise of its administrative functions – Article 266 TFEU – Decision adopted to give effect to a judgment of the General Court – Measures necessary to give effect to a judgment delivered in an action for annulment – Presumption of non-existence or non-possession of documents – Plausible explanations making it possible to determine the reasons for the non-existence or non-possession of documents – Obligation to state reasons – Retention of documentation – Principle of good administration.#Case T-857/19.

cjeu_case ·