Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
32231

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 12 November 2020.#Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-446/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
32232

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 12 November 2020.#Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-446/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
32233

Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 12 novembre 2020.#SP contre KLM Royal Dutch Airlines.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Transport aérien – Règlement (CE) no 261/2004 – Règles communes en matière d’indemnisation et d’assistance des passagers en cas de refus d’embarquement et d’annulation ou de retard important d’un vol – Article 5, paragraphe 1, sous c) – Article 7, paragraphe 1 – Droit à indemnisation – Retard important à l’arrivée – Vol réservé auprès d’un transporteur aérien communautaire et composé de deux vols opérés par des transporteurs aériens différents au départ d’un pays tiers et à destination d’un État membre – Retard important survenu à l’occasion du premier vol assuré, dans le cadre d’un contrat de partage de code, par un transporteur aérien d’un pays tiers – Recours indemnitaire intenté contre le transporteur communautaire.#Affaire C-367/20.

cjeu_case ·
32234

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 November 2020.#SP v KLM Royal Dutch Airlines.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights – Article 5(1)(c) – Article 7(1) – Right to compensation – Long delay in arrival – Flight reserved through a Community air carrier involving two flights, operated by different air carriers, departing from a third country for a Member State – Long delay which occurred during the first flight operated, under a code-share agreement, by an air carrier established in a third country – Action brought for compensation against the Community carrier.#Case C-367/20.

cjeu_case ·
32235

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 November 2020.#SC Novart Engineering SRL v Unitatea Administrativ Teritorială Municipiul Tulcea.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 89/665/EEC – Review procedures in respect of the award of public supply and public works contracts – Scope – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 4 – Threshold amount for public contracts – Contracts which may have some cross-border interest – No information enabling a useful answer – Request manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-170/20.

cjeu_case ·
32236

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 November 2020.#SC Novart Engineering SRL v Unitatea Administrativ Teritorială Municipiul Tulcea.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanţa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 89/665/EEC – Review procedures in respect of the award of public supply and public works contracts – Scope – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 4 – Threshold amount for public contracts – Contracts which may have some cross-border interest – No information enabling a useful answer – Request manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-170/20.

cjeu_case ·
32237

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 November 2020.#Lazarus Szolgáltató és Kereskedelmi Kft. v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – State aid – Aid implemented by Hungary in favour of undertakings employing disabled workers – Alleged decisions of the European Commission declaring the measure compatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Deadline for lodging an appeal – Starting point – Awareness of the existence of the contested measure – Reasonable time in which to request the full text thereof – Definition of ‘actionable measure’ within the meaning of Article 263 TFEU – Inadmissibility of the application at first instance – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-85/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
32238

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 November 2020.#Lazarus Szolgáltató és Kereskedelmi Kft. v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – State aid – Aid implemented by Hungary in favour of undertakings employing disabled workers – Alleged decisions of the European Commission declaring the measure compatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Deadline for lodging an appeal – Starting point – Awareness of the existence of the contested measure – Reasonable time in which to request the full text thereof – Definition of ‘actionable measure’ within the meaning of Article 263 TFEU – Inadmissibility of the application at first instance – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-85/20 P.

cjeu_case ·