32041Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Alliance of Conservatives and Reformists in Europe (ACRE) v European Parliament.#Institutional law – European Parliament – Decision declaring certain expenses of a political party ineligible for a grant for the year 2017 – Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 – Prohibition of the funding of a national political party – Contribution or donation by a national political party – Principle of sound administration – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Decision granting a contribution to a political party for 2019 and making pre-funding of 100% of the maximum amount of the contribution subject to certain prior repayments – Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014 – Rights of defence.#Case T-107/19.cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.
32042Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#BMC Srl v Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking.#Research and technological development and space – Framework Programme for Research and Innovation ‘Horizon 2020’ (2014-2020) – Procedure for call for proposals H2020-CS 2-CFP08-FRC‑2018-01 – Rejection of the proposal submitted by the applicant – Assignment of non-integer scores – Article 15(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1290/2013 – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Misuse of powers – Failure to sufficiently examine the proposal – Distortion of the facts.#Case T-71/19.cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.
32043Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#BMC Srl v Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking.#Research and technological development and space – Framework Programme for Research and Innovation ‘Horizon 2020’ (2014-2020) – Procedure for call for proposals H2020-CS 2-CFP08-FRC‑2018-01 – Rejection of the proposal submitted by the applicant – Assignment of non-integer scores – Article 15(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1290/2013 – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Misuse of powers – Failure to sufficiently examine the proposal – Distortion of the facts.#Case T-71/19.cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.
32044Case T-882/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 November 2020 — Kerangus v EUIPO (ΑΠΛΑ!) (EU trade mark — Application for an EU figurative mark ΑΠΛΑ! — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Equal treatment)cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.
32045Case T-875/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 November 2020 — Impera v EUIPO — Euro Games Technology (Flaming Forties) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark Flaming Forties — Earlier national figurative mark 40 FLAMING FRUITS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.
32046Case T-874/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 November 2020 — Impera v EUIPO — Euro Games Technology (Flaming Forties) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Flaming Forties — Earlier national figurative mark 40 FLAMING FRUITS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.
32047Case T-862/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 November 2020 — Brasserie St Avold v EUIPO (shape of a dark bottle) (EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Three-dimensional sign — Shape of a dark bottle — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.
32048Case T-802/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 November 2020 — Kisscolor Living v EUIPO — Teoxane (KISS COLOR) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark KISS COLOR — Earlier EU word mark KISS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Temporal application of the law)cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.
32049Case T-362/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 November 2020 — UI v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Expatriation allowance — Article 4(1)(a) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Refusal to grant the expatriation allowance — Habitual residence — Place where the person’s main occupation is carried on — Five-year reference period)cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.
32050Case T-310/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 November 2020 — BRF Singapore Foods v EUIPO — Tipiak (SADIA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark SADIA — Earlier national word mark SAIDA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Principle of sound administration — Equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.
32051Case T-309/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 November 2020 — BRF Singapore Foods v EUIPO — Tipiak (Sadia) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Sadia — Earlier national word mark SAIDA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Principle of sound administration — Equal treatment — Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.
32052Case T-166/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 November 2020 –Bronckers v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Agreement between the European Community and the United Mexican States on the mutual recognition and protection of designations for spirit drinks — Documents submitted within the framework of the Joint Committee — Refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the protection of the public interest in respect of international relations — Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party)cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.
32053Case T-107/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 November 2020 — ACRE v Parliament (Institutional law — European Parliament — Decision declaring certain expenses of a political party ineligible for a grant for the year 2017 — Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 — Prohibition of the funding of a national political party — Contribution or donation by a national political party — Principle of sound administration — Legal certainty — Equal treatment — Decision granting a contribution to a political party for 2019 and making pre-funding of 100 % of the maximum amount of the contribution subject to certain prior repayments — Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014 — Rights of defence)cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.
32054Case T-71/19: Judgment of the General Court of 25 November 2020 — BMC v Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking (Research and technological development and space — Framework Programme for Research and Innovation ‘Horizon 2020’ (2014-2020) — Procedure for call for proposals H2020-CS 2 -CFP08-FRC-2018-01 — Rejection of the proposal submitted by the applicant — Assignment of non-integer scores — Article 15(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1290/2013 — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers — Failure to sufficiently examine the proposal — Distortion of the facts)cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.
32055Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 25 novembre 2020.#NI e.a. contre Sociálna poisťovňa.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Directive 2008/94/CE – Articles 2 et 3 – Protection des travailleurs en cas d’insolvabilité de l’employeur – Notions de “créances impayées des travailleurs salariés” et d’“insolvabilité d’un employeur” – Accident du travail – Décès de l’employé – Indemnité du préjudice moral – Recouvrement de la créance auprès de l’employeur – Impossibilité – Institution de garantie.#Affaire C-799/19.cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.
32056Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#NI and Others v Sociálna poisťovňa.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Košice I.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2008/94/EC – Articles 2 and 3 – Protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer – Concepts of ‘employees’ outstanding claims’ and ‘insolvency of an employer’ – Accident at work – Death of the employee – Compensation for non-material damage – Recovery of the claim against the employer – Impossible – Guarantee institution.#Case C-799/19.cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.
32057Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers CVBA (SABAM) v Weareone.World BVBA and Wecandance NV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of a dominant position – Concept of ‘unfair prices’ – Collective copyright-management company – De facto monopoly – Dominant position – Abuse – Performance of musical works at music festivals – Charging scheme based on gross receipts from ticket sales – Reasonableness in relation to the collective management company’s service – Determination of the share of the collective management company’s music repertoire actually performed.#Case C-372/19.cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.
32058Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers CVBA (SABAM) v Weareone.World BVBA and Wecandance NV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ondernemingsrechtbank Antwerpen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of a dominant position – Concept of ‘unfair prices’ – Collective copyright-management company – De facto monopoly – Dominant position – Abuse – Performance of musical works at music festivals – Charging scheme based on gross receipts from ticket sales – Reasonableness in relation to the collective management company’s service – Determination of the share of the collective management company’s music repertoire actually performed.#Case C-372/19.cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.
32059Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 25 novembre 2020.#Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) contre VR.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 2003/109/CE – Statut des ressortissants de pays tiers résidents de longue durée – Article 11 – Droit à l’égalité de traitement – Sécurité sociale – Réglementation d’un État membre excluant, pour la détermination des droits à une prestation familiale, les membres de la famille du résident de longue durée qui ne résident pas sur le territoire de cet État membre.#Affaire C-303/19.cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.
32060Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale v VR.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Request for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2003/109/EC – Status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents – Article 11 – Right to equal treatment – Social security – Legislation of a Member State excluding, for the determination of rights to a family benefit, the family members of a long-term resident who do not reside in the territory of that Member State.#Case C-303/19.cjeu_case · 25 ноября 2020 г.