Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
31921

Case C-767/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 December 2020 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directives 2009/72/EC and 2009/73/EC — Internal market in electricity and natural gas — Effective separation between the operation of electricity and gas transmission networks on the one hand, and supply and production activities on the other — Establishment of independent national regulatory authorities)

cjeu_case ·
31923

Case C-320/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin — Germany) — Ingredion Germany GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2003/87/EC — Greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme — Article 3(h) — New entrants — Article 10a — Transitional rules for free allocation of emission allowances — Decision 2011/278/EU — Article 18(1)(c) — Fuel-related activity level — Second subparagraph of Article 18(2) — Relevant capacity utilisation factor)

cjeu_case ·
31925

Joined Cases C-72/19 P and C-145/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 December 2020 — Suzanne Saleh Thabet, Gamal Mohamed Hosni Elsayed Mubarak, Alaa Mohamed Hosni Elsayed Mubarak, Heddy Mohamed Magdy Hussein Rassekh, Khadiga Mahmoud El Gammal v Council of the European Union (Appeal — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Egypt — Freezing of funds and economic resources — List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicants’ names — Decision of an authority of a third State — Obligation of the Council of the European Union to verify that that decision was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
31926

Case C-62/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti — Romania) — Star Taxi App SRL v Unitatea Administrativ Teritorială Municipiul Bucureşti prin Primar General and Consiliul General al Municipiului Bucureşti (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 56 TFEU — Applicability — Purely internal situation — Directive 2000/31/EC — Article 2(a) — Concept of ‘information society services’ — Article 3(2) and (4) — Article 4 — Applicability — Directive 2006/123/EC — Services — Chapters III (Freedom of establishment for providers) and IV (Free movement of services) — Applicability — Articles 9 and 10 — Directive (EU) 2015/1535 — Article 1(1)(e) and (f) — Concept of ‘rule on services’ — Concept of ‘technical regulation’ — Article 5(1) — No prior communication — Enforceability — Activity consisting in putting persons wishing to be transported around the city in touch, by means of a smartphone application, with authorised taxi drivers — Classification — National legislation making that activity subject to a prior authorisation scheme)

cjeu_case ·
31927

Case C-44/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Repsol Petróleo SA v Administracíon General del Estado (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2003/96/EC — Taxation of energy products and electricity — Article 21(3) — Absence of chargeable event giving rise to taxation — Consumption of energy products within the curtilage of an establishment in which they were produced for the production of final energy products from which non-energy products are also inevitably produced)

cjeu_case ·
31928

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 3 décembre 2020.#Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd contre Distillerie Bonollo SpA e.a.#Pourvoi – Dumping – Importations d’acide tartrique originaire de Chine – Pourvoi formé par une partie intervenante en première instance – Article 56, deuxième alinéa, deuxième phrase, du statut de la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne – Réexamen intermédiaire partiel – Perte du statut d’entreprise opérant dans les conditions d’une économie de marché lors de la procédure de réexamen – Modification du droit antidumping définitif – Détermination de la valeur normale – Article 11, paragraphe 9, du règlement (CE) no 1225/2009 – Pourvoi incident – Recours en annulation introduit par des producteurs concurrents établis sur le territoire de l’Union européenne – Recevabilité – Affectation directe – Répartition des compétences d’exécution d’un arrêt.#Affaire C-461/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
31929

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 December 2020.#Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd v Distillerie Bonollo SpA and Others.#Appeal – Dumping – Imports of tartaric acid originating in China – Appeal brought by an intervener at first instance – Second sentence of the second paragraph of Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Partial interim review – Loss of market economy treatment during the review procedure – Modification of the definitive anti-dumping duty – Determination of the normal value – Article 11(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 – Cross-appeal – Action for annulment brought by competing producers established in the European Union – Admissibility – Direct concern – Allocation of powers to comply with a judgment.#Case C-461/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
31930

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 3 December 2020.#Hungary v European Parliament.#Action for annulment – Article 7(1) TEU – European Parliament resolution on a proposal calling on the Council of the European Union to determine the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach of the values on which the European Union is founded – Articles 263 and 269 TFEU – Jurisdiction of the Court – Admissibility of the appeal – Challengeable act – Article 354 TFEU – Rules for counting votes in the Parliament – Rules of Procedure of the Parliament – Rule 178(3) – Concept of ‘votes cast’ – Abstentions – Principles of legal certainty, equal treatment, democracy and sincere cooperation.#Case C-650/18.

cjeu_case ·
31931

Case C-461/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 December 2020 — Changmao Biochemical Engineering Co. Ltd v Distillerie Bonollo SpA and Others (Appeal — Dumping — Imports of tartaric acid originating in China — Appeal brought by an intervener at first instance — Second sentence of the second paragraph of Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Partial interim review — Loss of market economy treatment during the review procedure — Modification of the definitive anti-dumping duty — Determination of the normal value — Article 11(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 — Cross-appeal — Action for annulment brought by competing producers established in the European Union — Admissibility — Direct concern — Allocation of powers to comply with a judgment)

cjeu_case ·
31932

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 December 2020.#BSH Hausgeräte GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark Home Connect – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Sufficiently direct and specific relationship with the goods covered by the trade mark application – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-152/20.

cjeu_case ·
31933

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 December 2020.#BSH Hausgeräte GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark Home Connect – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Sufficiently direct and specific relationship with the goods covered by the trade mark application – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-152/20.

cjeu_case ·
31938

Case T-152/20: Judgment of the General Court of 2 December 2020 — BSH Hausgeräte v EUIPO (Home Connect) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark Home Connect — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Sufficiently direct and specific relationship with the goods covered by the trade mark application — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
31939

Case T-35/20: Judgment of the General Court of 2 December 2020 — Monster Energy v EUIPO — Nanjing aisiyou Clothing (Representation of a scratch) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark representing a claw-like scratch — Earlier EU and UK figurative marks representing claw-like scratches — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b), (4) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·