31681Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 December 2020.#Maen Haikal v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against Syria – Freezing of funds – Rights of the defence – Right to a fair hearing – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assessment – Right to property – Proportionality – Right to carry on an economic activity – Right to respect for private and family life.#Case T-189/19.cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2020 г.
31682Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 December 2020.#Maen Haikal v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against Syria – Freezing of funds – Rights of the defence – Right to a fair hearing – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assessment – Right to property – Proportionality – Right to carry on an economic activity – Right to respect for private and family life.#Case T-189/19.cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2020 г.
31683Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 December 2020.#3V Sigma SpA v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH – Substance evaluation – UVASORB HEB – Decision of the ECHA requesting further information – Article 46(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Request seeking to identify potential transformation or degradation products of the substance – Proportionality – Need for the additional study requested – Relevant conditions and realistic conditions – Study temperature – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-176/19.cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2020 г.
31684Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 December 2020.#3V Sigma SpA v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH – Substance evaluation – UVASORB HEB – Decision of the ECHA requesting further information – Article 46(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Request seeking to identify potential transformation or degradation products of the substance – Proportionality – Need for the additional study requested – Relevant conditions and realistic conditions – Study temperature – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-176/19.cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2020 г.
31685Case T-660/19: Order of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — Universität Bremen v REA (Action for annulment — Grant proposal — Horizon Europe — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation — Call for proposals H2020-SC6-Governance-2019 — REA decision rejecting a proposal — No representation by a lawyer — Manifest inadmissibility of the action)cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2020 г.
31686Case T-883/19: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — Gustopharma Consumer Health v EUIPO — Helixor Heilmittel (HELIX ELIXIR) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark HELIX ELIXIR — Earlier EU word mark HELIXOR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2020 г.
31687Case T-863/19: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — Production Christian Gallimard v EUIPO — Éditions Gallimard (PCG CALLIGRAM CHRISTIAN GALLIMARD) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark PCG CALLIGRAM CHRISTIAN GALLIMARD — Previous EU word marks GALLIMARD — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Conceptual comparison — Surnames — Independent distinctive role — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2020 г.
31688Case T-860/19: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — Alkemie Group v EUIPO — Mann & Schröder (ALKEMIE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark ALKEMIE — Earlier EU word mark Alkmene — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2020 г.
31689Case T-859/19: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — Alkemie Group v EUIPO — Mann & Schröder (ALKEMIE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark ALKEMIE — Earlier EU word mark Alkmene — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2020 г.
31690Case T-736/19: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — HA v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Reimbursement of medical expenses — Ceiling for reimbursement of equipment for the treatment of sleep apnoea — Action for annulment — No purely confirmatory act — Interest in bringing proceedings — Admissibility — Joint Rules on sickness insurance for officials — General implementing provisions)cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2020 г.
31691Case T-665/19: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — Cinkciarz.pl v EUIPO (€$) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark €$ — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctiveness — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2020 г.
31692Case T-535/19: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — H.R. Participations v EUIPO — Hottinger Investment Management (JCE HOTTINGUER) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark JCE HOTTINGUER — Non-registered earlier national trade mark HOTTINGER — Relative ground for refusal — Reference to the national law governing the earlier mark — Rules governing common law actions for passing-off — Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, respectively))cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2020 г.
31693Case T-521/19: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — Haswani v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Syria — Freezing of funds — Res judicata — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Proportionality)cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2020 г.
31694Case T-315/19: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — BT v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Surviving spouse — Survivor’s pension — Articles 18 and 20 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — Conditions for eligibility — Duration of the marriage — Plea of illegality — Equal treatment — Principle of non-discrimination on grounds of age — Proportionality)cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2020 г.
31695Case T-286/19: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — Azarov v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2020 г.
31696Case T-189/19: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — Haikal v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Rights of the defence — Right to a fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Right to effective judicial protection — Error of assessment — Right to property — Proportionality — Right to carry on an economic activity — Right to respect for private and family life)cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2020 г.
31697Case T-176/19: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2020 — 3V Sigma v ECHA (REACH — Substance evaluation — UVASORB HEB — Decision of the ECHA requesting further information — Article 46(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Request seeking to identify potential transformation or degradation products of the substance — Proportionality — Need for the additional study requested — Relevant conditions and realistic conditions — Study temperature — Manifest error of assessment)cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2020 г.
31698Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 16 December 2020.#Bilbaína de Alquitranes, SA v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Environment – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Classification of pitch, coal tar, high-temp as an Aquatic Acute 1 (H400) toxic substance and as an Aquatic Chronic 1 (H410) toxic substance – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-645/18.cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2020 г.
31699Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 16 December 2020.#Bilbaína de Alquitranes, SA v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Environment – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Classification of pitch, coal tar, high-temp as an Aquatic Acute 1 (H400) toxic substance and as an Aquatic Chronic 1 (H410) toxic substance – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-645/18.cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2020 г.
31700Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 16 December 2020.#SGL Carbon SE v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Environment – Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures – Classification of pitch, coal tar, high-temp as an Aquatic Acute 1 (H400) toxic substance and as an Aquatic Chronic 1 (H410) toxic substance – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-639/18.cjeu_case · 16 декабря 2020 г.