Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
31302

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark BBQLOUMI – Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-328/17 RENV.

cjeu_case ·
31303

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2021.#Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark BBQLOUMI – Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-328/17 RENV.

cjeu_case ·
31304

Case T-328/17 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 20 January 2021 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — M. J. Dairies (BBQLOUMI) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark BBQLOUMI — Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
31314

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 19 January 2021.#Leinfelder Uhren München GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-401/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
31315

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 19 January 2021.#Leinfelder Uhren München GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-401/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
31316

Case T-712/18: Order of the General Court of 19 January 2021 — Umweltinstitut München v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a meeting of the Joint Management Committee for Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures established by the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada, on the one hand, and the European Union and its Member States, on the other hand (CETA) — Refusal of partial access — Disclosure of the requested document after the appeal has been lodged — No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings — No need to adjudicate)

cjeu_case ·