31141Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 27 January 2021.#European Commission v Fernando De Esteban Alonso.#Appeal – Civil service – Internal investigation by the European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF) – Forwarding of information by OLAF to the national judicial authorities – Filing of a complaint by the European Commission – Concepts of an official who is ‘referred to by name’ and ‘implicated’ – Failure to inform the interested party – Commission’s right to file a complaint with the national judicial authorities before the conclusion of OLAF’s investigation – Action for damages.#Case C-591/19 P.cjeu_case · 27 января 2021 г.
31142Case C-787/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 January 2021 — European Commission v Republic of Austria (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 306 to 310 — Special scheme for travel agents — Application to all types of clients — National legislation excluding travel services that are provided to taxable persons who use those services for their business — Article 73 — Taxable amount — Determination of a taxable amount on a flat-rate basis for groups of services or for all services provided during the taxable period — Incompatibility)cjeu_case · 27 января 2021 г.
31143Case C-361/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven — Netherlands) — De Ruiter vof v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common agricultural policy — Support scheme for farmers — Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 — Article 97(1) and Article 99(1) — Direct payments — Reductions and exclusions in the event of non-compliance with the cross-compliance rules — Determination of the year to be taken into account in order to calculate the percentage reduction — Proportionate, effective and dissuasive penalties — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 — Article 73(4), first subparagraph, point (a))cjeu_case · 27 января 2021 г.
31144Joined Cases C-229/19 and C-289/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 January 2021 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te Amsterdam, Gerechtshof Den Haag — Netherlands) — Dexia Nederland BV v XXX (C-229/19), Z (C-289/19) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Articles 3(1), 4(1) and 6(1) — Assessment of the unfairness of contractual terms — Term fixing in advance the creditor’s potential advantage in the event of termination of the contract — Significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations under the contract — Date on which the imbalance must be assessed — Finding that a term is unfair — Consequences — Replacement of an unfair term with a supplementary provision of national law)cjeu_case · 27 января 2021 г.
31145Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 27 January 2021.#KPN BV v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – Netherlands market for television services and telecommunications services – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement – Relevant market – Vertical effects – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-691/18.cjeu_case · 27 января 2021 г.
31146Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 27 January 2021.#KPN BV v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – Netherlands market for television services and telecommunications services – Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement – Relevant market – Vertical effects – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-691/18.cjeu_case · 27 января 2021 г.
31147Case T-691/18: Judgment of the General Court of 27 January 2021 — KPN v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — Netherlands market for television services and telecommunications services — Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement — Relevant market — Vertical effects — Manifest error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 27 января 2021 г.
31148Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 27 janvier 2021.#Ayuntamiento de Pamplona contre Orange España SAU.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Autorisation de réseaux et de services de communications électroniques – Taxe municipale pour l’occupation ou l’exploitation du domaine public – Directive 2002/20/CE – Application aux entreprises fournissant des services de téléphonie fixe et d’accès à Internet – Notions de “réseaux de communications électroniques” et de “service de communications électroniques” – Article 12 – Taxes administratives – Article 13 – Redevances pour les droits d’utilisation et les droits de mettre en place des ressources – Champ d’application – Limitations à l’exercice du pouvoir d’imposition des États membres.#Affaire C-764/18.cjeu_case · 27 января 2021 г.
31149Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 January 2021.#Ayuntamiento de Pamplona v Orange España SAU.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Authorisation of electronic communications networks and services – Municipal charge for the occupation or use of public land – Directive 2002/20/EC – Application to undertakings providing fixed telephony and Internet access services – Concepts of ‘electronic communications network’ and of ‘electronic communications services’ – Article 12 – Administrative charges – Article 13 – Fees for rights of use and rights to install facilities – Scope – Limitations on the Member States’ power to impose fees.#Case C-764/18.cjeu_case · 27 января 2021 г.
31150Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 27 January 2021.#The Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European market for power cables – Market allocation in connection with projects – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 23(2) – Attributability of unlawful conduct of one company to another company – Presumption of actual exercise of decisive influence – Entity controlling 100% of the voting rights associated with the shares of another company.#Case C-595/18 P.cjeu_case · 27 января 2021 г.
31151Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 27 January 2021.#The Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European market for power cables – Market allocation in connection with projects – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 23(2) – Attributability of unlawful conduct of one company to another company – Presumption of actual exercise of decisive influence – Entity controlling 100% of the voting rights associated with the shares of another company.#Case C-595/18 P.cjeu_case · 27 января 2021 г.
31152Case C-764/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Ayuntamiento de Pamplona v Orange España SAU (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Authorisation of electronic communications networks and services — Municipal charge for the occupation or use of public land — Directive 2002/20/EC — Application to undertakings providing fixed telephony and Internet access services — Concepts of ‘electronic communications network’ and of ‘electronic communications services’ — Article 12 — Administrative charges — Article 13 — Fees for rights of use and rights to install facilities — Scope — Limitations on the Member States’ power to impose fees)cjeu_case · 27 января 2021 г.
31153Case C-595/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 27 January 2021 — The Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v European Commission, Prysmian SpA, Prysmian Cavi e Sistemi Srl (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for power cables — Market allocation in connection with projects — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 23(2) — Attributability of unlawful conduct of one company to another company — Presumption of actual exercise of decisive influence — Entity controlling 100 % of the voting rights associated with the shares of another company)cjeu_case · 27 января 2021 г.
31154Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 27 January 2021.#Republic of Poland v European Commission.#Environment – Directive 2010/75/EU – Industrial emissions – Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1442 – Large combustion plants – Best available techniques (BAT) conclusions – Article 16(4) and (5) TEU – Article 3(2) and (3) of Protocol (No 36) on transitional provisions – Application of the law ratione temporis – Comitology.#Case T-699/17.cjeu_case · 27 января 2021 г.
31155Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 27 January 2021.#Republic of Poland v European Commission.#Environment – Directive 2010/75/EU – Industrial emissions – Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1442 – Large combustion plants – Best available techniques (BAT) conclusions – Article 16(4) and (5) TEU – Article 3(2) and (3) of Protocol (No 36) on transitional provisions – Application of the law ratione temporis – Comitology.#Case T-699/17.cjeu_case · 27 января 2021 г.
31156Case T-699/17: Judgment of the General Court of 27 January 2021 — Poland v Commission (Environment — Directive 2010/75/EU — Industrial emissions — Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1442 — Large combustion plants — Best available techniques (BAT) conclusions — Article 16(4) and (5) TEU — Article 3(2) and (3) of Protocol (No 36) on transitional provisions — Application of the law ratione temporis — Comitology)cjeu_case · 27 января 2021 г.
31157Case T-51/21: Action brought on 26 January 2021 — About You v EUIPO — Safe-1 Immobilieninvest (Y/O/U YOUR ORIGINAL U)cjeu_case · 26 января 2021 г.
31158Case T-50/21: Action brought on 26 January 2021 — About You v EUIPO — Safe-1 Immobilieninvest (Y/O/U YOUR ORIGINAL U)cjeu_case · 26 января 2021 г.
31159Case T-46/21: Action brought on 26 January 2021 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Yajun (PREMILITY)cjeu_case · 26 января 2021 г.