Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
31127

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 January 2021.#Turk Hava Yollari AO v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark skylife – Earlier EU word mark SKY – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-382/19.

cjeu_case ·
31128

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 January 2021.#Turk Hava Yollari AO v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark skylife – Earlier EU word mark SKY – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-382/19.

cjeu_case ·
31129

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 27 January 2021.#ClientEarth v European Investment Bank.#Environment – Financing of a biomass power generation plant in Galicia – Resolution of the Board of Directors of the EIB approving the financing – Access to justice in environmental matters – Articles 9 and 10 of the Aarhus Convention – Articles 10 to 12 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Request for an internal review – Refusal of the request as inadmissible – Action for annulment – Admissibility of a ground of defence – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of an act adopted under environmental law – Concept of an act having a legally binding and external effect.#Case T-9/19.

cjeu_case ·
31130

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 27 January 2021.#ClientEarth v European Investment Bank.#Environment – Financing of a biomass power generation plant in Galicia – Resolution of the Board of Directors of the EIB approving the financing – Access to justice in environmental matters – Articles 9 and 10 of the Aarhus Convention – Articles 10 to 12 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Request for an internal review – Refusal of the request as inadmissible – Action for annulment – Admissibility of a ground of defence – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of an act adopted under environmental law – Concept of an act having a legally binding and external effect.#Case T-9/19.

cjeu_case ·
31133

Case T-9/19: Judgment of the General Court of 27 January 2021 — ClientEarth v EIB (Environment — Financing of a biomass power generation plant in Galicia — Resolution of the Board of Directors of the EIB approving the financing — Access to justice in environmental matters — Articles 9 and 10 of the Aarhus Convention — Articles 10 to 12 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Request for an internal review — Refusal of the request as inadmissible — Action for annulment — Admissibility of a ground of defence — Obligation to state reasons — Concept of an act adopted under environmental law — Concept of an act having a legally binding and external effect)

cjeu_case ·
31134

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 January 2021.#European Commission v Republic of Austria.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 306 to 310 – Special scheme for travel agents – Application to all types of clients – National legislation excluding travel services that are provided to taxable persons who use those services for their business – Article 73 – Taxable amount – Determination of a taxable amount on a flat-rate basis for groups of services or for all services provided during the taxable period – Incompatibility.#Case C-787/19.

cjeu_case ·
31135

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 January 2021.#European Commission v Republic of Austria.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 306 to 310 – Special scheme for travel agents – Application to all types of clients – National legislation excluding travel services that are provided to taxable persons who use those services for their business – Article 73 – Taxable amount – Determination of a taxable amount on a flat-rate basis for groups of services or for all services provided during the taxable period – Incompatibility.#Case C-787/19.

cjeu_case ·
31136

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 27 janvier 2021.#De Ruiter vof contre Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique agricole commune – Régime de soutien aux agriculteurs – Règlement (UE) no 1306/2013 – Article 97, paragraphe 1, et article 99, paragraphe 1 – Paiements directs – Réductions et exclusions en cas de non-respect des règles de conditionnalité – Détermination de l’année à prendre en compte afin de déterminer le pourcentage de réduction – Sanctions proportionnées, effectives et dissuasives – Règlement d’exécution (UE) no 809/2014 – Article 73, paragraphe 4, premier alinéa, sous a).#Affaire C-361/19.

cjeu_case ·
31137

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 27 January 2021.#De Ruiter vof v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Support scheme for farmers – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 97(1) and Article 99(1) – Direct payments – Reductions and exclusions in the event of non-compliance with the cross-compliance rules – Determination of the year to be taken into account in order to calculate the percentage reduction – Proportionate, effective and dissuasive penalties – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 – Article 73(4), first subparagraph, point (a).#Case C-361/19.

cjeu_case ·
31138

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 27 janvier 2021.#Dexia Nederland BV contre XXX et Z.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 93/13/CEE – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Article 3, paragraphe 1, article 4 paragraphe 1, et article 6, paragraphe 1 – Appréciation du caractère abusif des clauses contractuelles – Clause fixant au préalable l’avantage potentiel du créancier en cas de résiliation du contrat – Déséquilibre significatif entre les droits et les obligations des parties découlant du contrat – Date à laquelle le déséquilibre doit être apprécié – Constatation du caractère abusif d’une clause – Conséquences – Substitution d’une clause abusive par une disposition du droit interne à caractère supplétif.#Affaires jointes C-229/19 et C-289/19.

cjeu_case ·
31139

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 January 2021.#Dexia Nederland BV v XXX and Z.#References for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te Amsterdam and Gerechtshof Den Haag.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Articles 3(1), 4(1) and 6(1) – Assessment of the unfairness of contractual terms – Term fixing in advance the creditor’s potential advantage in the event of termination of the contract – Significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations under the contract – Date on which the imbalance must be assessed – Finding that a term is unfair – Consequences – Replacement of an unfair term with a supplementary provision of national law.#Joined Cases C-229/19 and C-289/19.

cjeu_case ·
31140

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 27 January 2021.#The North of England P & I Association Ltd v Bundeszentralamt für Steuern.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Köln.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Direct insurance other than life assurance – Second Directive 88/357/EEC – Second indent of Article 2(d) – Directive 92/49/EEC – First subparagraph of Article 46(2) – Taxation of insurance premiums – Concept of ‘Member State where the risk is situated’ – Vehicles of any type – Concept of ‘Member State of registration’ – Insurance of sea-going vessels – Ships entered in the shipping register maintained by one Member State but flying the flag of another Member State or of a third State under a temporary flagging-out authorisation.#Case C-786/19.

cjeu_case ·