30981Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 February 2021.#eurocylinder systems AG v Hauptzollamt Hamburg.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common commercial policy – Anti-dumping duties – Regulation (EC) No 384/96 – Article 3(9) – Threat of material injury – Factors – Article 9(4) – Regulation (EC) No 926/2009 – Imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or steel originating in the People’s Republic of China – Invalidity.#Case C-324/19.cjeu_case · 4 февраля 2021 г.
30982Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 4 February 2021.#C.J. v Région wallonne.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Namur.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 807/2014 – Young farmers setting up – Farm development – Business start-up aid for young farmers – Conditions of access – Equivalence – Not setting up as sole head of the holding – Upper thresholds – Fixing – Criteria – Standard output of the agricultural holding.#Case C-830/19.cjeu_case · 4 февраля 2021 г.
30983Case C-701/19 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 February 2021 — Pilatus Bank plc v European Central Bank (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Appeal manifestly unfounded — Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Suspension measures taken by the national supervisory authority — Appointment of a contact person — Conditional communication with the European Central Bank (ECB) — Withdrawal of licence prior to the commencement of proceedings — Action for annulment — Inadmissibility — Absence of a sufficiently clear and precise summary of the pleas in law relied on before the General Court — Failure to demonstrate a legal interest in bringing proceedings — Incorrect classification as a preparatory act — Substitution of grounds)cjeu_case · 4 февраля 2021 г.
30984Case C-903/19: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — DQ v Ministre de la Transition écologique et solidaire, Ministre de l’Action and des Comptes publics (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Civil service — Transfer of retirement pension rights — Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 11 of Annex VIII — Officials and temporary staff reinstated in their national administration of origin after a period of non-active status and the performance of duties in an EU institution)cjeu_case · 4 февраля 2021 г.
30985Case C-760/19: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) — United Kingdom) — JCM Europe (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — Common Customs Tariff — Combined Nomenclature — Tariff classification — Headings 8472 and 9031 — Bank note validator and cash boxes — Device intended to be integrated in a host device and connected to an external control centre — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1760 — Validity)cjeu_case · 4 февраля 2021 г.
30986Case C-640/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Azienda Agricola Ambrosi Nicola Giuseppe and Others v Agenzia per le Erogazioni in Agricoltura (AGEA), Ministero delle Politiche agricole e forestali (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture — Common organisation of markets — Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 — Milk quotas — Surplus levies — Milk used to produce cheeses with a protected designation of origin (PDO) intended for export to non-EU countries — Exclusion — Article 32(a), Article 39(1) and (2)(a), Article 40(2) and Article 41(b) TFEU — Principles of proportionality and non-discrimination — Validity)cjeu_case · 4 февраля 2021 г.
30987Case C-324/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — eurocylinder systems AG v Hauptzollamt Hamburg (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common commercial policy — Anti-dumping duties — Regulation (EC) No 384/96 — Article 3(9) — Threat of material injury — Factors — Article 9(4) — Regulation (EC) No 926/2009 — Imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of iron or steel originating in the People’s Republic of China — Invalidity)cjeu_case · 4 февраля 2021 г.
30988Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 4 February 2021.#Germann Avocats LLC v European Commission.#Action for annulment and for damages – Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Follow-up study on trade union practices on non-discrimination and diversity – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Award criteria – Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law and in part manifestly inadmissible.#Case T-352/18.cjeu_case · 4 февраля 2021 г.
30989Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 4 February 2021.#Germann Avocats LLC v European Commission.#Action for annulment and for damages – Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Follow-up study on trade union practices on non-discrimination and diversity – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Award criteria – Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law and in part manifestly inadmissible.#Case T-352/18.cjeu_case · 4 февраля 2021 г.
30990Case T-352/18: Order of the General Court of 4 February 2021 — Germann Avocats v Commission (Action for annulment and for damages — Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — Follow-up study on trade union practices on non-discrimination and diversity — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Award criteria — Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law and in part manifestly inadmissible)cjeu_case · 4 февраля 2021 г.
30991Case T-81/21: Action brought on 3 February 2021 — Sistem ecologica v Commissioncjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.
30992Case T-79/21: Action brought on 3 February 2021 — Ryanair and AMS v Commissioncjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.
30993Case T-72/21: Action brought on 3 February 2021 — Bowden and Young v Europolcjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.
30994Case C-75/21 P: Appeal brought on 3 February 2021 by Bilbaína de Alquitranes, SA against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 16 December 2020 in Case T-645/18, Bilbaína de Alquitranes SA v Commissioncjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.
30995Case C-73/21 P: Appeal brought on 3 February 2021 by Química del Nalón SA, formerly Industrial Química del Nalón SA against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 16 December 2020 in Case T-635/18, Industrial Química del Nalón SA v Commissioncjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.
30996Case C-70/21: Action brought on 3 February 2021 — European Commission v Hellenic Republiccjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.
30997Case C-68/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 3 February 2021 — Iveco Orecchia SpA v APAM Esercizio SpAcjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.
30998Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Klymenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation of the Council of the European Union to verify that that decision was taken in accordance with the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-258/20.cjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.
30999Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 February 2021.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Klymenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation of the Council of the European Union to verify that that decision was taken in accordance with the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-258/20.cjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.
31000Case T-258/20: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2021 — Klymenko v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Obligation of the Council of the European Union to verify that that decision was taken in accordance with the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection)cjeu_case · 3 февраля 2021 г.