30881Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 February 2021.#Katoen Natie Bulk Terminals NV and General Services Antwerp NV v Belgische Staat and Middlegate Europe NV v Ministerraad.#References for a preliminary ruling from Raad van State and Grondwettelijk Hof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 45 TFEU – Freedom of movement for workers – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Article 56 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – Carrying out of port activities – Dockers – Access to the profession and recruitment – Arrangements for the recognition of dockers – Dockers not part of the quota of workers provided for in national legislation – Limitation of the duration of the work contract – Mobility of dockers between different port areas – Workers carrying out logistical work – Safety certificate – Overriding reasons in the public interest – Safety in port areas – Protection of workers – Proportionality.#Joined Cases C-407/19 and C-471/19.cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2021 г.
30882Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 11 February 2021.#LH v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats 's-Hertogenbosch.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Asylum policy – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 40(2) – Subsequent application – New elements or findings – Concept – Documents the authenticity of which cannot be established or the source of which cannot be objectively verified – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 4(1) and (2) – Assessment of the evidence – Obligation of the Member State concerned to cooperate.#Case C-921/19.cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2021 г.
30883Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 11 February 2021.#Bankia SA v Unión Mutua Asistencial de Seguros (UMAS).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2003/71/EC – Prospectus when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading – Article 3(2) – Article 6 – Offer addressed to both retail investors and qualified investors – Content of information given in the prospectus – Action for damages – Retail investors and qualified investors – Awareness of the issuer’s economic situation.#Case C-910/19.cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2021 г.
30884Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 11 February 2021.#CF and DN v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection – Directive 2011/95/EU – Conditions for granting subsidiary protection – Article 15(c) – Concept of ‘serious and individual threat’ to a civilian’s life or person by reason of indiscriminate violence in situations of international or internal armed conflict – National legislation requiring a minimum number of civilian casualties (killed and injured) in the relevant region.#Case C-901/19.cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2021 г.
30885Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 11 February 2021.###cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2021 г.
30886Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 11 February 2021.#A v Latvijas Republikas Veselības ministrija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of movement for persons – Citizenship of the Union – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 3(1)(a) – Sickness benefits – Concept – Article 4 and Article 11(3)(e) – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 7(1)(b) – Right of residence for more than three months – Condition of having comprehensive sickness insurance cover – Article 24 – Equal treatment – Economically inactive national of a Member State residing legally in the territory of another Member State – Refusal by the host Member State to affiliate that person to its public sickness insurance system.#Case C-535/19.cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2021 г.
30887Case C-755/19: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — T.H.C. v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Asylum policy — Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 46 — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy — Action brought against the rejection of a subsequent application for international protection as inadmissible — Time limit for bringing proceedings — Detention)cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2021 г.
30888Case C-506/19 P: Order of the President of the Court of Justice of 11 February 2021 — Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines, Hafize Darya Shipping Lines (HDSL), Safiran Payam Darya Shipping Lines (SAPID), Khazar Sea Shipping Lines Co., Rahbaran Omid Darya Ship Management Co., Irinvestship Ltd, IRISL Europe GmbH v Council of the European Unioncjeu_case · 11 февраля 2021 г.
30889Joined Cases C-407/19 and C-471/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 February 2021 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State, Grondwettelijk Hof — Belgium) — Katoen Natie Bulk Terminals NV, General Services Antwerp NV (C-407/19), Middlegate Europe NV (C-471/19) v Belgische Staat (C-407/19), Ministerraad (C-471/19) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 45 TFEU — Freedom of movement for workers — Article 49 TFEU — Freedom of establishment — Article 56 TFEU — Freedom to provide services — Carrying out of port activities — Dockers — Access to the profession and recruitment — Arrangements for the recognition of dockers — Dockers not part of the quota of workers provided for in national legislation — Limitation of the duration of the work contract — Mobility of dockers between different port areas — Workers carrying out logistical work — Safety certificate — Overriding reasons in the public interest — Safety in port areas — Protection of workers — Proportionality)cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2021 г.
30890Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 February 2021.#Unipreus SL.#Interpretation of an order – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-763/18 P-INT.cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2021 г.
30891Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 11 février 2021.#Interprétation d’une ordonnance – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-763/18 P-INT.cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2021 г.
30892Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 11 février 2021.#M.V. e.a. contre Organismos Topikis Aftodioikisis (O.T.A.) « Dimos Agiou Nikolaou ».#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Directive 1999/70/CE – Accord-cadre CES, UNICE et CEEP sur le travail à durée déterminée – Clause 5 – Mesures visant à prévenir les abus résultant de l’utilisation de contrats ou de relations de travail à durée déterminée successifs – Contrats de travail à durée déterminée dans le secteur public – Contrats successifs ou premier contrat prorogé – Mesure légale équivalente – Interdiction constitutionnelle absolue de transformer des contrats de travail à durée déterminée en contrats à durée indéterminée – Obligation d’interprétation conforme.#Affaire C-760/18.cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2021 г.
30893Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 February 2021.#M.V. and Others v Organismos Topikis Aftodioikisis (O.T.A.) «Dimos Agiou Nikolaou».#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Monomeles Protodikeio Lasithiou.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 5 – Measures to prevent abuse arising from the use of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships – Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector – Successive contracts or extended initial contract – Equivalent legal measure – Absolute constitutional prohibition on the conversion of fixed-term employment contracts to contracts of indefinite duration – Obligation to interpret in conformity with EU law.#Case C-760/18.cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2021 г.
30894Case C-760/18: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Monomeles Protodikeio Lasithiou — Greece) — M.V. and Others v Organismos Topikis Aftodioikisis (OTA) ‘Dimos Agiou Nikolaou’ (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term employment concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 5 — Measures to prevent abuse arising from the use of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships — Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector — Successive contracts or extended initial contract — Equivalent legal measure — Absolute constitutional prohibition on conversion of fixed-term employment contracts to contracts of indefinite duration — Obligation to interpret in conformity with EU law)cjeu_case · 11 февраля 2021 г.
30895Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 February 2021.#EAB AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark RADIOSHUTTLE – Absolute ground for refusal – Not distinctive – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Restriction of the goods designated in the trade mark application.#Case T-341/20.cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2021 г.
30896Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 February 2021.#EAB AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark RADIOSHUTTLE – Absolute ground for refusal – Not distinctive – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Restriction of the goods designated in the trade mark application.#Case T-341/20.cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2021 г.
30897Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 February 2021.#Gabriele Bachmann v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark LICHTYOGA – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-157/20.cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2021 г.
30898Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 February 2021.#Gabriele Bachmann v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark LICHTYOGA – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-157/20.cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2021 г.
30899Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 February 2021.#Gabriele Bachmann v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark LIGHTYOGA – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-153/20.cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2021 г.
30900Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 February 2021.#Gabriele Bachmann v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark LIGHTYOGA – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-153/20.cjeu_case · 10 февраля 2021 г.