30701Case C-118/21 P: Appeal brought on 25 February 2021 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 16 December 2020 in Case T-442/17 RENV, RN v Commissioncjeu_case · 25 февраля 2021 г.
30702Case C-117/21 P: Appeal brought on 25 February 2021 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 16 December 2020 in Case T-315/19, BT v Commissioncjeu_case · 25 февраля 2021 г.
30703Case C-116/21 P: Appeal brought on 25 February 2021 by the European Commission against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 16 December 2020 in Case T-243/18, VW v Commissioncjeu_case · 25 февраля 2021 г.
30704Case C-115/21 P: Appeal brought on 25 February 2021 by Oriol Junqueras i Vies against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 15 December 2020 in Case T-24/20, Junqueras i Vies v Parliamentcjeu_case · 25 февраля 2021 г.
30705Case C-112/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 25 February 2021 — X BV v Classic Coach Company vof, Y, Zcjeu_case · 25 февраля 2021 г.
30706Case C-111/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 25 February 2021 — BT v Laudamotion GmbHcjeu_case · 25 февраля 2021 г.
30707Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 February 2021.#Ultrasun AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark ULTRASUN – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-437/20.cjeu_case · 25 февраля 2021 г.
30708Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 February 2021.#Ultrasun AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark ULTRASUN – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-437/20.cjeu_case · 25 февраля 2021 г.
30709Case T-437/20: Order of the General Court of 25 February 2021 — Ultrasun v EUIPO (ULTRASUN) (Action for annulment — EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark ULTRASUN — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 25 февраля 2021 г.
30710Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 February 2021.#Stadtapotheke E v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Linz-Land.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to a fair trial – Application for a licence for a new pharmacy – Obligation to request an expert opinion from the chamber of pharmacists – Freedom to choose an occupation and right to engage in work – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to property – Conditions for the establishment of a new pharmacy – Proportionality – Failure to implement EU law – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-378/20.cjeu_case · 25 февраля 2021 г.
30711Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 February 2021.#Stadtapotheke E v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Linz-Land.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to a fair trial – Application for a licence for a new pharmacy – Obligation to request an expert opinion from the chamber of pharmacists – Freedom to choose an occupation and right to engage in work – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to property – Conditions for the establishment of a new pharmacy – Proportionality – Failure to implement EU law – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-378/20.cjeu_case · 25 февраля 2021 г.
30712Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 25 février 2021.#XI contre Caisse pour l'avenir des enfants.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Directive 2010/18/UE – Accord-cadre révisé sur le congé parental – Réglementation nationale subordonnant l’octroi du droit à un congé parental à une condition d’occupation d’un emploi et à l’affiliation obligatoire à ce titre du travailleur au régime de sécurité sociale concerné à la date de naissance de l’enfant.#Affaire C-129/20.cjeu_case · 25 февраля 2021 г.
30713Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 February 2021.#XI v Caisse pour l'avenir des enfants.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2010/18/EU – Revised Framework Agreement on parental leave – National legislation making the grant of a right to parental leave subject to a condition of employment and to the mandatory affiliation in that regard of the worker to the social security scheme concerned on the date on which the child was born.#Case C-129/20.cjeu_case · 25 февраля 2021 г.
30714Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 25 February 2021.#„Latvijas dzelzceļš” VAS v Valsts dzelzceļa administrācija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EU – Single European railway area – Article 13(2) and (6) – Access to service facilities and to rail-related services – Regulation (EU) 2017/2177 – Reconversion of facilities – Powers of the regulatory body.#Case C-60/20.cjeu_case · 25 февраля 2021 г.
30715Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 25 February 2021.#DB Netz AG v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – International rail freight corridors – Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 – Article 13(1) – Establishment of a one-stop shop for each freight corridor – Article 14 – Nature of the framework for the allocation of the infrastructure capacity on the freight corridor laid down by the executive board – Article 20 – Regulatory bodies – Directive 2012/34/EU – Article 27 – Procedure for submitting applications for infrastructure capacity – Role of infrastructure managers – Articles 56 and 57 – Functions of the regulatory bodies and cooperation between regulatory bodies.#Case C-12/20.cjeu_case · 25 февраля 2021 г.
30716Case C-378/20: Order of the Court (Eight Chamber) of 25 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich — Austria) — Stadtapotheke E v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Linz-Land (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to a fair trial — Application for a licence for a new pharmacy — Obligation to request an expert opinion from the chamber of pharmacists — Freedom to choose an occupation and right to engage in work — Freedom to conduct a business — Right to property — Conditions for the establishment of a new pharmacy — Proportionality — Failure to implement EU law — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)cjeu_case · 25 февраля 2021 г.
30717Case C-129/20: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg — Luxembourg) — XI v Caisse pour l’avenir des enfants (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2010/18/EU — Revised Framework Agreement on parental leave — National legislation making the grant of a right to parental leave subject to a condition of employment and to the mandatory affiliation in that regard of the worker to the social security scheme concerned on the date on which the child was born)cjeu_case · 25 февраля 2021 г.
30718Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 25 février 2021.#Les Chirurgiens-Dentistes de France e.a. contre Ministre des Solidarités et de la Santé e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Reconnaissance des qualifications professionnelles – Directive 2005/36/CE – Article 4 septies, paragraphe 6 – Réglementation nationale – Admission de la possibilité d’un accès partiel à l’une des professions relevant du mécanisme de la reconnaissance automatique des qualifications professionnelles.#Affaire C-940/19.cjeu_case · 25 февраля 2021 г.
30719Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 February 2021.#Les Chirurgiens-Dentistes de France and Others v Ministre des Solidarités et de la Santé and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Recognition of professional qualifications – Directive 2005/36/EC – Article 4f(6) – National regulation – Allowing for the possibility of partial access to one of the professions covered by the mechanism for the automatic recognition of professional qualifications.#Case C-940/19.cjeu_case · 25 февраля 2021 г.
30720Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 25 février 2021.#Slovak Telekom a.s. contre Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Concurrence – Article 102 TFUE – Abus de position dominante – Répartition des compétences entre la Commission européenne et les autorités nationales de concurrence – Règlement (CE) no 1/2003 – Article 11, paragraphe 6 – Dessaisissement des autorités nationales de concurrence de leur compétence – Principe ne bis in idem – Article 50 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne.#Affaire C-857/19.cjeu_case · 25 февраля 2021 г.