30541Case C-365/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Schwerin — Germany) — FD v Staatliches Amt für Landwirtschaft und Umwelt Mittleres Mecklenburg (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common agricultural policy — Direct payments — Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 — Article 24 — Young farmer having received an initial allocation of payment entitlements — Article 30(6) — Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 — Article 28(2) — Further allocation of payment entitlements from the national reserve)cjeu_case · 10 марта 2021 г.
30542Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#Ayuntamiento de Quart de Poblet v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013) – ‘Highly scalable Deployment model of Inclusive E-Gvern’ (DIEGO) and ‘Speeding Every European Digital’ (SEED) contracts – Debit notes – Eligible costs – Justification of the costs – Reliability of records of tasks carried out for the projects.#Case T-539/18.cjeu_case · 10 марта 2021 г.
30543Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#Ayuntamiento de Quart de Poblet v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013) – ‘Highly scalable Deployment model of Inclusive E-Gvern’ (DIEGO) and ‘Speeding Every European Digital’ (SEED) contracts – Debit notes – Eligible costs – Justification of the costs – Reliability of records of tasks carried out for the projects.#Case T-539/18.cjeu_case · 10 марта 2021 г.
30544Case T-539/18: Judgment of the General Court of 10 March 2021 — Ayuntamiento de Quart de Poblet v Commission (Arbitration clause — Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013) — ‘Highly scalable Deployment model of Inclusive E-Govern’ (DIEGO) and ‘Speeding Every European Digital’ (SEED) contracts — Debit notes — Eligible costs — Justification of the costs — Reliability of records of tasks carried out for the projects)cjeu_case · 10 марта 2021 г.
30545Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 March 2021.#ViaSat, Inc. v European Commission.#Action for failure to act and for annulment – Electronic communications networks and services – Harmonised use of the 2 GHz frequency spectrum – Pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) – Decision 2007/98/EC – Harmonised operator selection procedure – Authorisations granted to the selected operators – Decision No 626/2008/EC – Request for action to be taken – No formal notice – Adoption of a position by the Commission – Inadmissibility – Refusal to take action – Measure not actionable – Inadmissibility – Powers of the Commission.#Case T-245/17.cjeu_case · 10 марта 2021 г.
30546Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 March 2021.#ViaSat, Inc. v European Commission.#Action for failure to act and for annulment – Electronic communications networks and services – Harmonised use of the 2 GHz frequency spectrum – Pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) – Decision 2007/98/EC – Harmonised operator selection procedure – Authorisations granted to the selected operators – Decision No 626/2008/EC – Request for action to be taken – No formal notice – Adoption of a position by the Commission – Inadmissibility – Refusal to take action – Measure not actionable – Inadmissibility – Powers of the Commission.#Case T-245/17.cjeu_case · 10 марта 2021 г.
30547Case T-245/17: Judgment of the General Court of 10 March 2021 — ViaSat v Commission (Action for failure to act and for annulment — Electronic communications networks and services — Harmonised use of the 2 GHz frequency spectrum — Pan-European systems providing mobile satellite services (MSS) — Decision 2007/98/EC — Harmonised operator selection procedure — Authorisations granted to the selected operators — Decision No 626/2008/EC — Request for action to be taken — No formal notice — Adoption of a position by the Commission — Inadmissibility — Refusal to take action — Measure not actionable — Inadmissibility — Powers of the Commission)cjeu_case · 10 марта 2021 г.
30548Case C-154/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 9 March 2021 — RW v Österreichische Post AGcjeu_case · 9 марта 2021 г.
30549Case C-152/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 9 March 2021 — SIA ‘Ogres HES’ v Sabiedrisko pakalpojumu regulēšanas komisija, Ekonomikas ministrija, Finanšu ministrijacjeu_case · 9 марта 2021 г.
30550Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 March 2021.#RJ v Stadt Offenbach am Main.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 2 – Concept of ‘working time’ – Period of stand-by time according to a stand-by system – Professional firefighters – Directive 89/391/EEC – Articles 5 and 6 – Psychosocial risks – Obligation to prevent.#Case C-580/19.cjeu_case · 9 марта 2021 г.
30551Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 March 2021.#RJ v Stadt Offenbach am Main.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Darmstadt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 2 – Concept of ‘working time’ – Period of stand-by time according to a stand-by system – Professional firefighters – Directive 89/391/EEC – Articles 5 and 6 – Psychosocial risks – Obligation to prevent.#Case C-580/19.cjeu_case · 9 марта 2021 г.
30552Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 March 2021.#VG Bild-Kunst v Stiftung Preußischer Kulturbesitz.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights in the information society – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 3(1) – Concept of ‘communication to the public’ – Embedding, in a third party’s website, of a copyright-protected work by means of the process of framing – Work freely accessible with the authorisation of the copyright holder on the licensee’s website – Clause in the exploitation agreement requiring the licensee to introduce effective technological measures against framing – Lawfulness – Fundamental rights – – Article 11 and Article 17(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-392/19.cjeu_case · 9 марта 2021 г.
30553Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 March 2021.#VG Bild-Kunst v Stiftung Preußischer Kulturbesitz.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights in the information society – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 3(1) – Concept of ‘communication to the public’ – Embedding, in a third party’s website, of a copyright-protected work by means of the process of framing – Work freely accessible with the authorisation of the copyright holder on the licensee’s website – Clause in the exploitation agreement requiring the licensee to introduce effective technological measures against framing – Lawfulness – Fundamental rights – – Article 11 and Article 17(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-392/19.cjeu_case · 9 марта 2021 г.
30554Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 March 2021.#D. J. v Radiotelevizija Slovenija.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 2 – Concept of ‘working time’ – Stand-by time according to a stand-by system – Specific work maintaining television transmitters situated far away from residential areas – Directive 89/391/EEC – Articles 5 and 6 – Psychosocial risks – Obligation to prevent.#Case C-344/19.cjeu_case · 9 марта 2021 г.
30555Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 March 2021.#D. J. v Radiotelevizija Slovenija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 2 – Concept of ‘working time’ – Stand-by time according to a stand-by system – Specific work maintaining television transmitters situated far away from residential areas – Directive 89/391/EEC – Articles 5 and 6 – Psychosocial risks – Obligation to prevent.#Case C-344/19.cjeu_case · 9 марта 2021 г.
30556Case C-580/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Darmstadt — Germany) — RJ v Stadt Offenbach am Main (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of the safety and health of workers — Organisation of working time — Directive 2003/88/EC — Article 2 — Concept of ‘working time’ — Period of stand-by time according to a stand-by system — Professional firefighters — Directive 89/391/EEC — Articles 5 and 6 — Psychosocial risks — Obligation to prevent)cjeu_case · 9 марта 2021 г.
30557Case C-392/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — VG Bild-Kunst v Stiftung Preußischer Kulturbesitz (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property — Copyright and related rights in the information society — Directive 2001/29/EC — Article 3(1) — Concept of ‘communication to the public’ — Embedding, in a third party’s website, of a copyright-protected work by means of the process of framing — Work freely accessible with the authorisation of the copyright holder on the licensee’s website — Clause in the exploitation agreement requiring the licensee to introduce effective technological measures against framing — Lawfulness — Fundamental rights — Article 11 and Article 17(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)cjeu_case · 9 марта 2021 г.
30558Case C-344/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče — Slovenia) — D.J. v Radiotelevizija Slovenija (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of the safety and health of workers — Organisation of working time — Directive 2003/88/EC — Article 2 — Concept of ‘working time’ — Stand-by time according to a stand-by system — Specific work maintaining television transmitters situated far away from residential areas — Directive 89/391/EEC — Articles 5 and 6 — Psychosocial risks — Obligation to prevent)cjeu_case · 9 марта 2021 г.
30559Case C-148/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’arrondissement (Luxembourg) lodged on 8 March 2021 — Christian Louboutin v Amazon Europe Core Sàrl, Amazon EU Sàrl, Amazon Services Europe Sàrlcjeu_case · 8 марта 2021 г.
30560Case C-147/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 8 March 2021 — Comité interprofessionnel des huiles essentielles françaises (CIHEF), Florame, Hyteck Aroma-Zone, Laboratoires Gilbert, Laboratoire Léa Nature, Laboratoires Oméga Pharma France, Pierre Fabre Médicament, Pranarom France, Puressentiel France v Ministre de la Transition écologique, Premier ministrecjeu_case · 8 марта 2021 г.