30481Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 11 mars 2021.#Commission européenne contre Hongrie.#Manquement d’État – Organisation commune des marchés des produits agricoles – Règlement (UE) no 1308/2013 – Article 34 TFUE – Prix à la vente des produits agro-alimentaires – Marges bénéficiaires minimales à appliquer dans le commerce de détail de ces produits.#Affaire C-400/19.cjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.
30482Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 March 2021.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Common organisation of the markets in agricultural products – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Article 34 TFEU – Selling prices of agri-food products – Minimal profit margins to be applied in the retail trade of those products.#Case C-400/19.cjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.
30483Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 11 March 2021.#Scandlines Danmark ApS and Scandlines Deutschland v European Commission.#Appeal – Action for annulment – State aid – Public financing of the Fehmarn Belt fixed rail-road link – Individual aid – Notified aid declared compatible with the internal market – Execution of an important project of common European interest – Decision not to raise any objections – Monopoly – Distortion of competition and effect on trade.#Joined Cases C-174/19 P and C-175/19 P.cjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.
30484Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 11 March 2021.#Istanbul Convention.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU – Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (Istanbul Convention) – Signature by the European Union – Draft conclusion by the European Union – Concept of an ‘agreement envisaged’, within the meaning of Article 218(11) TFEU – External competences of the European Union – Substantive legal basis – Article 78(2) TFEU – Article 82(2) TFEU – Article 83(1) TFEU – Article 84 TFEU – Article 336 TFEU – Articles 1 to 4a of Protocol (No 21) on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the area of freedom, security and justice – Partial participation of Ireland in the conclusion of the Istanbul Convention by the European Union – Possibility of splitting the act concluding an international agreement into two separate decisions according to the applicable legal bases – Practice of ‘common accord’ – Compatibility with the TEU and the TFEU.#Case Avis 1/19.cjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.
30485Case C-812/19: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen — Sweden) — Danske Bank A/S, Danmark, Sverige Filial v Skatteverket (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 9 — Taxable person — Concept — Article 11 — VAT group — Principal establishment and branch of a company situated in two different Member States — Principal establishment forming part of a VAT group to which the branch does not belong — Principal establishment providing services to the branch and imputing to it the costs of those services)cjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.
30486Case C-802/19: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Firma Z v Finanzamt Y (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 90(1) — Reduction of the taxable amount — Principles laid down in the judgment of 24 October 1996, Elida Gibbs (C-317/94, EU:C:1996:400) — Supplies of medicinal products — Granting of discounts — Hypothetical nature of the question referred — Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)cjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.
30487Case C-400/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 March 2021 — European Commission v Hungary (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Common organisation of the markets in agricultural products — Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 — Article 34 TFEU — Selling prices of agri-food products — Minimal profit margins to be applied in the retail trade of those products)cjeu_case · 11 марта 2021 г.
30488Case T-7/21: Order of the General Court of 10 March 2021 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Kassl (STUDIO KASSL) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for registration — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 10 марта 2021 г.
30489Case C-161/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte dei conti — Sezione regionale di controllo per la Campania (Italy) lodged on 10 March 2021 — Comune di Camerotacjeu_case · 10 марта 2021 г.
30490Case C-160/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo (Bulgaria) lodged on 10 March 2021 — ‘NIKOPOLIS AD ISTRUM 2010’ EOOD v Izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond ‘Zemedelie’cjeu_case · 10 марта 2021 г.
30491Case C-155/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt (Sweden) lodged on 10 March 2021 — Republiken Italien v Athena Investments A/S (formerly Greentech Energy Systems A/S), NovEnergia II Energy & Environment (SCA) SICAR, NovEnergia II Italian Portfolio SAcjeu_case · 10 марта 2021 г.
30492Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#Golvabia Innovation AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark MaxWear – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-99/20.cjeu_case · 10 марта 2021 г.
30493Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#Golvabia Innovation AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark MaxWear – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-99/20.cjeu_case · 10 марта 2021 г.
30494Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark PUMA-System – Earlier EU figurative marks PUMA – Relative ground for refusal – Detriment to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-71/20.cjeu_case · 10 марта 2021 г.
30495Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark PUMA-System – Earlier EU figurative marks PUMA – Relative ground for refusal – Detriment to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-71/20.cjeu_case · 10 марта 2021 г.
30496Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#Hauz 1929 Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark HAUZ EST 1929 – Earlier EU word mark HOUZZ – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-68/20.cjeu_case · 10 марта 2021 г.
30497Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#Hauz 1929 Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark HAUZ EST 1929 – Earlier EU word mark HOUZZ – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-68/20.cjeu_case · 10 марта 2021 г.
30498Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#Hauz 1929 Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark HAUZ NEW YORK – Earlier EU word mark HOUZZ – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-67/20.cjeu_case · 10 марта 2021 г.
30499Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#Hauz 1929 Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark HAUZ NEW YORK – Earlier EU word mark HOUZZ – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-67/20.cjeu_case · 10 марта 2021 г.
30500Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 March 2021.#Hauz 1929 Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark HAUZ LONDON – Earlier EU word mark HOUZZ – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-66/20.cjeu_case · 10 марта 2021 г.