30401Case T-186/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2021 — Chatwal v EUIPO — Timehouse Capital (THE TIME) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark THE TIME — Earlier EU word mark TIMEHOUSE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 17 марта 2021 г.
30402Case T-114/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2021 — Alvargonzález Ramos v EUIPO — Ursus-3 Capital, A.V. (URSUS Kapital) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark URSUS Kapital — Genuine use of the mark — Partial revocation — Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use — Assessment of the evidence — Classification of the services)cjeu_case · 17 марта 2021 г.
30403Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 March 2021.#UH v An tAire Talmhaíochta Bia agus Mara and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 288 TFEU – Directive 2001/82/EC – Community code relating to veterinary medicinal products – Articles 58, 59 and 61 – Information to be provided on outer packaging, immediate packaging and the package leaflet for veterinary medicinal products – Obligation to provide information in all the official languages of the Member State in which the product is marketed – National legislation providing that the information may be provided in one or other of the official languages of the Member State – National court hearing an action for a declaration that the Member State had failed correctly to transpose Directive 2001/82/EC and that the competent national authorities must amend the national legislation.#Case C-64/20.cjeu_case · 17 марта 2021 г.
30404Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 March 2021.#UH v An tAire Talmhaíochta Bia agus Mara and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from An Ard-Chúirt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 288 TFEU – Directive 2001/82/EC – Community code relating to veterinary medicinal products – Articles 58, 59 and 61 – Information to be provided on outer packaging, immediate packaging and the package leaflet for veterinary medicinal products – Obligation to provide information in all the official languages of the Member State in which the product is marketed – National legislation providing that the information may be provided in one or other of the official languages of the Member State – National court hearing an action for a declaration that the Member State had failed correctly to transpose Directive 2001/82/EC and that the competent national authorities must amend the national legislation.#Case C-64/20.cjeu_case · 17 марта 2021 г.
30405Case C-64/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Ard-Chúirt — Ireland) — UH v An tAire Talmhaíochta, Bia agus Mara, Éire, An tArd-Aighne (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 288 TFEU — Directive 2001/82/EC — Community code relating to veterinary medicinal products — Articles 58, 59 and 61 — Information to be provided on outer packaging, immediate packaging and the package leaflet for veterinary medicinal products — Obligation to provide information in all the official languages of the Member State in which the product is marketed — National legislation providing that the information may be provided in one or other of the official languages of the Member State — National court hearing an action for a declaration that the Member State had failed correctly to transpose Directive 2001/82/EC and that the competent national authorities must amend the national legislation)cjeu_case · 17 марта 2021 г.
30406Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 March 2021.#Gábor Bende v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark K-9 – Absolute grounds for refusal – Signs which have become customary – Article 7(1)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-878/19.cjeu_case · 17 марта 2021 г.
30407Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 March 2021.#Gábor Bende v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark K-9 – Absolute grounds for refusal – Signs which have become customary – Article 7(1)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-878/19.cjeu_case · 17 марта 2021 г.
30408Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 March 2021.#Reza Hossein Khan Tehrani v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Earnest Sewn – Declaration of invalidity – Absolute ground for refusal – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-853/19.cjeu_case · 17 марта 2021 г.
30409Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 March 2021.#Reza Hossein Khan Tehrani v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Earnest Sewn – Declaration of invalidity – Absolute ground for refusal – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-853/19.cjeu_case · 17 марта 2021 г.
30410Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 17 March 2021.#EJ v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Remuneration – Travel costs – Double dependent child allowance – Child with serious illness – Capping of the backdated reimbursement of those costs and of that double allowance – Reasonable period – Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff – Action for annulment and for damages.#Case T-585/19.cjeu_case · 17 марта 2021 г.
30411Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 17 March 2021.#EJ v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Remuneration – Travel costs – Double dependent child allowance – Child with serious illness – Capping of the backdated reimbursement of those costs and of that double allowance – Reasonable period – Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff – Action for annulment and for damages.#Case T-585/19.cjeu_case · 17 марта 2021 г.
30412Case T-878/19: Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2021 — Bende v EUIPO — Julius-K9 (K-9) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark K-9 — Relative grounds for refusal — Signs which have become customary — Article 7(1)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 17 марта 2021 г.
30413Case T-853/19: Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2021 — Tehrani v EUIPO — Blue Genes (Earnest Sewn) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark Earnest Sewn — Declaration of invalidity — Absolute ground for refusal — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 17 марта 2021 г.
30414Case T-585/19: Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2021 — EJ v EIB (Civil service — EIB staff — Remuneration — Travel costs — Double dependent child allowance — Child with serious illness — Capping of the backdated reimbursement of those costs and of that double allowance — Reasonable period — Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff — Action for annulment and for damages)cjeu_case · 17 марта 2021 г.
30415Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 March 2021.#Association One Voice and Ligue pour la protection des oiseaux v Ministre de la Transition écologique et solidaire.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2009/147/EC – Conservation of wild birds – Articles 5 and 8 – Prohibition of the use of any method of capture of birds – Article 9(1) – Authorisation to use, by way of derogation, a traditional method of capture of birds – Conditions – No other satisfactory solution – Preservation of that traditional method as the sole justification for the absence of an ‘other satisfactory solution’ – Selectivity of catches – National legislation authorising the capture of birds using limes.#Case C-900/19.cjeu_case · 17 марта 2021 г.
30416Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 March 2021.#Association One Voice and Ligue pour la protection des oiseaux v Ministre de la Transition écologique et solidaire.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2009/147/EC – Conservation of wild birds – Articles 5 and 8 – Prohibition of the use of any method of capture of birds – Article 9(1) – Authorisation to use, by way of derogation, a traditional method of capture of birds – Conditions – No other satisfactory solution – Preservation of that traditional method as the sole justification for the absence of an ‘other satisfactory solution’ – Selectivity of catches – National legislation authorising the capture of birds using limes.#Case C-900/19.cjeu_case · 17 марта 2021 г.
30417Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 17 mars 2021.#KO contre Consulmarketing SpA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Directive 1999/70/CE – Accord-cadre CES, UNICE et CEEP sur le travail à durée déterminée – Clause 4 – Principe de non-discrimination – Raisons objectives justifiant un traitement différent des travailleurs à durée déterminée – Directive 98/59/CE – Licenciement collectif – Réglementation nationale relative à la protection à accorder à un travailleur victime d’un licenciement collectif irrégulier – Application d’un régime de protection moins avantageux aux contrats à durée déterminée conclus avant la date de son entrée en vigueur, convertis en contrats à durée indéterminée après cette date.#Affaire C-652/19.cjeu_case · 17 марта 2021 г.
30418Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 March 2021.#KO v Consulmarketing SpA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Objective reasons justifying different treatment of fixed-term workers – Directive 98/59/EC – Collective redundancy – National legislation on the protection to be afforded to a worker dismissed as part of an unlawful collective redundancy – Application of a less advantageous protection system to fixed-term contracts concluded before its entry into force and converted into contracts of an indefinite duration after that date.#Case C-652/19.cjeu_case · 17 марта 2021 г.
30419Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 17 mars 2021.#Academia de Studii Economice din Bucureşti contre Organismul Intermediar pentru Programul Operaţional Capital Uman – Ministerul Educaţiei Naţionale.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Protection de la sécurité et de la santé des travailleurs – Aménagement du temps de travail – Directive 2003/88/CE – Article 2 – Notion de “temps de travail” – Article 3 – Période minimale de repos journalier – Travailleurs ayant conclu plusieurs contrats de travail avec un même employeur – Application par travailleur.#Affaire C-585/19.cjeu_case · 17 марта 2021 г.
30420Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 March 2021.#Academia de Studii Economice din Bucureşti v Organismul Intermediar pentru Programul Operaţional Capital Uman - Ministerul Educaţiei Naţionale.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bucureşti.#References for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 2 – Definition of ‘working time’ – Article 3 – Minimum period of daily rest – Workers having concluded several employment contracts with the same employer – Application by worker.#Case C-585/19.cjeu_case · 17 марта 2021 г.