30361Order of the President of the General Court of 19 March 2021.#UPL Europe Ltd and Indofil Industries (Netherlands) BV v European Commission.#Application for interim relief – Plant protection products – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2087 – Non-renewal of approval of the active substance mancozeb – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-742/20 R.cjeu_case · 19 марта 2021 г.
30362Order of the President of the General Court of 19 March 2021.#UPL Europe Ltd and Indofil Industries (Netherlands) BV v European Commission.#Application for interim relief – Plant protection products – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2087 – Non-renewal of approval of the active substance mancozeb – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-742/20 R.cjeu_case · 19 марта 2021 г.
30363Case T-742/20 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 19 March 2021 — Indofil Industries (Netherlands) v Commission (Application for interim relief — Plant protection products — Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2087 — Non-renewal of approval of the active substance mancozeb — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — No urgency)cjeu_case · 19 марта 2021 г.
30364Case T-149/21: Action brought on 18 March 2021 — UGA Nutraceuticals v EUIPO — Vitae Health Innovation (VITADHA)cjeu_case · 18 марта 2021 г.
30365Order of the Court of 18 March 2021.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-678/20 P.cjeu_case · 18 марта 2021 г.
30366Order of the Court of 18 March 2021.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-678/20 P.cjeu_case · 18 марта 2021 г.
30367Order of the Court ((Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 18 March 2021.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case C-667/20 P.cjeu_case · 18 марта 2021 г.
30368Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 18 mars 2021.#UAB « P. » contre Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w B.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Système commun de la taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 203 – Taxes indûment facturées – Bonne foi de l’émetteur de la facture – Risque de perte de recettes fiscales – Obligations des États membres de prévoir la possibilité de régularisation de la taxe indûment facturée – Principes de neutralité fiscale et de proportionnalité.#Affaire C-48/20.cjeu_case · 18 марта 2021 г.
30369Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 March 2021.#UAB “P” v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w B.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 203 – Taxes improperly invoiced – Good faith on the part of the issuer of the invoice – Risk of loss of tax revenue – Obligations of the Member States to provide for the possibility of adjusting tax improperly invoiced – Principles of fiscal neutrality and proportionality.#Case C-48/20.cjeu_case · 18 марта 2021 г.
30370Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 18 March 2021.#L.R. v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Schleswig-Holsteinisches Verwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Application for international protection – Grounds of inadmissibility – Article 2(q) – Concept of ‘subsequent application’ – Article 33(2)(d) – Rejection by a Member State of an application for international protection as inadmissible due to the rejection of a previous application made by the person concerned in a third State with which the European Union has concluded an agreement on the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining an application for asylum lodged in one of the States parties to that agreement – Final decision taken by the Kingdom of Norway.#Case C-8/20.cjeu_case · 18 марта 2021 г.
30371Case C-48/20: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — UAB ‘P.’ v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w B. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 203 — Taxes improperly invoiced — Good faith on the part of the issuer of the invoice — Risk of loss of tax revenue — Obligations of the Member States to provide for the possibility of adjusting tax improperly invoiced — Principles of fiscal neutrality and proportionality)cjeu_case · 18 марта 2021 г.
30372Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 18 mars 2021.#A. contre Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité indirecte – TVA – Directive 2006/112/CE – Acquisition intracommunautaire de biens – Déduction de la taxe due en amont au titre d’une telle acquisition – Exigences formelles – Exigences de fond – Délai de dépôt de la déclaration fiscale – Principes de neutralité fiscale et de proportionnalité.#Affaire C-895/19.cjeu_case · 18 марта 2021 г.
30373Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 March 2021.#A. v Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Gliwicach.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Indirect taxation – VAT – Directive 2006/112/EC – Intra-Community acquisition of goods – Deduction of input tax payable on such an acquisition – Procedural requirements – Substantive requirements – Period within which the tax declaration must be submitted – Principles of fiscal neutrality and proportionality.#Case C-895/19.cjeu_case · 18 марта 2021 г.
30374Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 March 2021.#X v Kuoni Travel Ltd.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 90/314/EEC – Article 5(2), third indent – Package travel, package holidays and package tours – Contract concerning package travel concluded between a travel organiser and a consumer – Liability of the travel organiser for the proper performance of obligations arising from the contract by other suppliers of services – Damage resulting from the acts of an employee of a supplier of services – Exemption from liability – Event that cannot be foreseen or forestalled by the travel organiser or the supplier of services – Concept of a ‘supplier of services’.#Case C-578/19.cjeu_case · 18 марта 2021 г.
30375Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 March 2021.#X v Kuoni Travel Ltd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 90/314/EEC – Article 5(2), third indent – Package travel, package holidays and package tours – Contract concerning package travel concluded between a travel organiser and a consumer – Liability of the travel organiser for the proper performance of obligations arising from the contract by other suppliers of services – Damage resulting from the acts of an employee of a supplier of services – Exemption from liability – Event that cannot be foreseen or forestalled by the travel organiser or the supplier of services – Concept of a ‘supplier of services’.#Case C-578/19.cjeu_case · 18 марта 2021 г.
30376Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 18 mars 2021.#Pometon SpA contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Ententes – Marché européen de la grenaille abrasive métallique – Participation à des contacts bilatéraux et multilatéraux visant à coordonner les prix dans l’ensemble de l’espace économique européen – Procédure “hybride” ayant conduit successivement à l’adoption d’une décision de transaction et d’une décision au terme d’une procédure ordinaire – Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Article 41 – Devoir d’impartialité de la Commission européenne – Article 48 – Présomption d’innocence – Obligation de motivation – Infraction unique et continue – Durée de l’infraction – Égalité de traitement – Compétence de pleine juridiction.#Affaire C-440/19 P.cjeu_case · 18 марта 2021 г.
30377Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 March 2021.#Pometon SpA v European Commission.#Appeal – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European steel abrasives market – Participation in bilateral and multilateral contacts with the aim of coordinating prices throughout the European Economic Area (EEA) – ‘Hybrid’ procedure having led successively to the adoption of a settlement decision and a decision made under the ordinary procedure – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 41 – Principle of impartiality of the European Commission – Article 48 – Presumption of innocence – Obligation to state reasons – Single and continuous infringement – Duration of the infringement – Equal treatment – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case C-440/19 P.cjeu_case · 18 марта 2021 г.
30378Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 18 mars 2021.#MK contre Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité directe – Imposition des plus-values immobilières – Libre circulation des capitaux – Assiette de l’impôt – Discrimination – Option d’imposition selon les mêmes modalités que les résidents – Conformité au droit de l’Union.#Affaire C-388/19.cjeu_case · 18 марта 2021 г.
30379Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 March 2021.#MK v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa - CAAD).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Direct taxation – Tax on capital gains from immovable property – Free movement of capital – Basis for assessment of tax – Discrimination – Option to be taxed according to the same arrangements as residents – Compliance with EU law.#Case C-388/19.cjeu_case · 18 марта 2021 г.
30380Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 18 March 2021.#G. Sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Bydgoszczy.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 69 – Chargeability of VAT – Intra-Community acquisition of motor fuels – Obligation to make early payment of VAT – Article 206 – Concept of ‘interim payments’ – Article 273 – Correct collection of VAT and prevention of evasion – Discretion of the Member States.#Case C-855/19.cjeu_case · 18 марта 2021 г.