30281Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 March 2021.#Creaton South-East Europe Kft. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark CREATHERM – Earlier international word mark CERETHERM – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-168/20.cjeu_case · 24 марта 2021 г.
30282Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 March 2021.#Albert Darboven Holding GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark WINDSOR-CASTLE – Absolute ground for refusal – Distinctiveness – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Laudatory character.#Case T-93/20.cjeu_case · 24 марта 2021 г.
30283Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 March 2021.#Albert Darboven Holding GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark WINDSOR-CASTLE – Absolute ground for refusal – Distinctiveness – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Laudatory character.#Case T-93/20.cjeu_case · 24 марта 2021 г.
30284Case T-765/20 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 24 March 2021 — The Floow v Commission (Application for interim relief — Grant agreement entered into as part of the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) — Recovery of sums paid — Application for interim measures — No urgency)cjeu_case · 24 марта 2021 г.
30285Case T-374/20: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2021 — KM v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Surviving spouse — Survivor’s pension — Articles 18 and 20 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — Conditions for eligibility — Duration of the marriage — Plea of illegality — Equal treatment — Principle of non-discrimination on grounds of age — Proportionality)cjeu_case · 24 марта 2021 г.
30286Case T-354/20: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2021 –Kfz-Gewerbes v EUIPO — The Blink Fish (Representation of a fish) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark representing a fish — Earlier national word mark BLINKA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 24 марта 2021 г.
30287Case T-175/20: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2021 — Laboratorios Ern v EUIPO — Sanolie (SANOLIE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark SANOLIE — Earlier national word mark SANODIN — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 24 марта 2021 г.
30288Case T-168/20: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2021 — Creaton South-East Europe v EUIPO — Henkel (CREATHERM) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark CREATHERM — Earlier international word mark CERETHERM — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 24 марта 2021 г.
30289Case T-93/20: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2021 — Albert Darboven Holding v EUIPO (WINDSOR-CASTLE) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark WINDSOR-CASTLE — Absolute ground for refusal — Distinctiveness — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Laudatory character)cjeu_case · 24 марта 2021 г.
30290Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 25 March 2021.#smart things solutions GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-681/20 P.cjeu_case · 24 марта 2021 г.
30291Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 25 March 2021.#smart things solutions GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-681/20 P.cjeu_case · 24 марта 2021 г.
30292Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 March 2021.#SS v MCP.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Article 10 – Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility – Abduction of a child – Jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State – Territorial scope – Removal of a child to a third State – Habitual residence acquired in that third State.#Case C-603/20 PPU.cjeu_case · 24 марта 2021 г.
30293Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 March 2021.#SS v MCP.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England and Wales), Family Division.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Article 10 – Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility – Abduction of a child – Jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State – Territorial scope – Removal of a child to a third State – Habitual residence acquired in that third State.#Case C-603/20 PPU.cjeu_case · 24 марта 2021 г.
30294Case C-603/20 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice) (England & Wales), Family Division — United Kingdom) — SS v MCP (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Area of freedom, security and justice — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 10 — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Abduction of a child — Jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State — Territorial scope — Removal of a child to a third State — Habitual residence acquired in that third State)cjeu_case · 24 марта 2021 г.
30295Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 March 2021.#Graanhandel P. van Schelven BV v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Agricultural policy – Organic production – Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 – Production and labelling of organic products – Organic products imported into the European Union – Certification of products by a control body – No interest in bringing proceedings – Lack of direct concern – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-306/19.cjeu_case · 24 марта 2021 г.
30296Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 March 2021.#Graanhandel P. van Schelven BV v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Agricultural policy – Organic production – Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 – Production and labelling of organic products – Organic products imported into the European Union – Certification of products by a control body – No interest in bringing proceedings – Lack of direct concern – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-306/19.cjeu_case · 24 марта 2021 г.
30297Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 March 2021.#Jean-Luc Bennahmias v European Parliament.#Institutional law – Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of sums unduly paid – Burden of proof – Obligation to state reasons – Error of law – Error of fact – Proportionality.#Case T-799/19.cjeu_case · 24 марта 2021 г.
30298Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 March 2021.#Jean-Luc Bennahmias v European Parliament.#Institutional law – Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of sums unduly paid – Burden of proof – Obligation to state reasons – Error of law – Error of fact – Proportionality.#Case T-799/19.cjeu_case · 24 марта 2021 г.
30299Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 March 2021.#Jean-Luc Bennahmias v European Parliament.#Institutional law – Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of sums unduly paid – Burden of proof – Obligation to state reasons – Error of law – Error of fact – Proportionality.#Case T-798/19.cjeu_case · 24 марта 2021 г.
30300Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 March 2021.#Jean-Luc Bennahmias v European Parliament.#Institutional law – Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament – Parliamentary assistance allowance – Recovery of sums unduly paid – Burden of proof – Obligation to state reasons – Error of law – Error of fact – Proportionality.#Case T-798/19.cjeu_case · 24 марта 2021 г.