Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
29970

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#Validity Foundation - Mental Disability Advocacy Centre and Center for Independent Living Association v European Commission.#Appeal – European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) – Grant intended to support the deinstitutionalisation of social services for adults and people with disabilities – Letter of the European Commission refusing to suspend or cancel payment of the grant – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Concept of ‘challengeable act’ – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection.#Case C-622/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
29971

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#Validity Foundation - Mental Disability Advocacy Centre and Center for Independent Living Association v European Commission.#Appeal – European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) – Grant intended to support the deinstitutionalisation of social services for adults and people with disabilities – Letter of the European Commission refusing to suspend or cancel payment of the grant – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Concept of ‘challengeable act’ – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection.#Case C-622/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
29972

Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 15 avril 2021.#Kuluttaja-asiamies contre MiGame Oy.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Directive 2011/83/UE – Contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Article 21 – “Communication au téléphone” – Exploitation d’une ligne téléphonique par un professionnel afin de permettre aux consommateurs de le contacter au sujet d’un contrat conclu – Mise en place par une société, dans le cadre de son service après-vente concernant les contrats conclus, de deux lignes téléphoniques, à savoir une ligne fixe surtaxée et une ligne mobile gratuite – Contenu des supports de communication destinés à la clientèle – Admissibilité d’une ligne téléphonique d’assistance exposant les clients à un tarif plus élevé que le tarif de base – Notion de “tarif de base”.#Affaire C-594/20.

cjeu_case ·
29973

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#Kuluttaja-asiamies v MiGame Oy.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Markkinaoikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 2011/83/EU – Consumer contracts – Article 21 – ‘Communication by telephone’ – Telephone line operated by a trader so that consumers may contact it for matters relating to a previously concluded contract – Provision by a company, as part of the after-sales service for previously concluded contracts, of two telephone lines, namely a premium-rate landline and a mobile telephone line that is free of charge – Media content targeted at customers – Acceptability of a helpline which charges customers at a rate exceeding the basic rate – Concept of ‘basic rate’.#Case C-594/20.

cjeu_case ·
29975

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#Vogel Import Export NV v Belgische Staat.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 – Customs union – Common Customs Tariff – Tariff classification – Combined Nomenclature – Tariff headings – Headings 4407 and 4409 – Planed wooden boards the four corners of which have been slightly rounded over the entire length of the board.#Case C-62/20.

cjeu_case ·
29976

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 15 avril 2021.#Hengstenberg GmbH & Co. KG contre Spreewaldverein eV.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des indications géographiques et des appellations d’origine des produits agricoles et des denrées alimentaires – Règlement (UE) no 1151/2012 – Article 49, paragraphe 3, premier alinéa, et paragraphe 4, deuxième alinéa – Article 53, paragraphe 2, premier alinéa – Modification du cahier des charges d’un produit – Cornichons de la Forêt de la Sprée (Allemagne) “Spreewälder Gurken (IGP)” – Modifications qui ne sont pas mineures – Procédure d’opposition – Déclaration d’opposition à la demande de modification – Recours contre la décision accueillant cette demande – Notion d’“intérêt légitime”.#Affaire C-53/20.

cjeu_case ·
29977

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 April 2021.#Hengstenberg GmbH & Co. KG v Spreewaldverein eV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs – Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 – First subparagraph of Article 49(3) and second subparagraph of Article 49(4) – First subparagraph of Article 53(2) – Amendment to a product specification – Spreewald gherkins (Germany) ‘Spreewälder Gurken (PGI)’ – Amendments which are not minor – Opposition proceedings – Statement of opposition to the amendment application – Appeal against the decision granting that application – Concept of ‘legitimate interest’.#Case C-53/20.

cjeu_case ·
29978

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 15 April 2021.#X.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant – Grounds for optional non-execution – Article 4(5) – Requested person has been finally judged in a third State in respect of the same acts – Sentence has been served or may no longer be executed under the law of the sentencing country – Implementation – Margin of discretion of the executing judicial authority – Concept of ‘same acts’ – Remission of sentence granted by a non-judicial authority as part of a general leniency measure.#Case C-665/20 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
29979

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 15 April 2021.#V.М.А. v Stolichna obshtina, rayon „Pancharevo“.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Articles 20 and 21 TFEU – Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Child born in the host Member State of her parents – Birth certificate issued by that Member State mentioning two mothers in respect of that child – Refusal by the Member State of origin of one of those two mothers to issue a birth certificate for the child in the absence of information as to the identity of the child’s biological mother – Possession of such a certificate being a prerequisite for the issue of an identity card or a passport – Persons of the same sex not recognised as parents under the national legislation of that Member State of origin.#Case C-490/20.

cjeu_case ·
29980

Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 15 April 2021.#WD v job-medium GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2003/88/EC – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Article 7(1) – Right to an allowance in lieu of paid annual leave not taken before the end of the employment relationship – Early termination of the employment relationship by the employee.#Case C-233/20.

cjeu_case ·