2961Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 December 2025.#V4 Holding, a.s. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark V4 Financial Partners – Earlier national figurative mark V4 – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-274/24.cjeu_case · 10 декабря 2025 г.
2962Case T-518/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 December 2025 – Cin Valentine v EUIPO – Daw (VAL --- ACRYL) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark VAL – ACRYL – Earlier EU word mark Malacryl – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 10 декабря 2025 г.
2963Case T-481/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 December 2025 – Savencia v EUIPO – Hofmeister (Shape of a cheese) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Three-dimensional mark in the shape of a cheese – Earlier three-dimensional national marks – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion – Distinctive character of the earlier mark – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 10 декабря 2025 г.
2964Case T-369/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 December 2025 – Pumpyanskiy v Council (Non-contractual liability – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Financial and non-material damage – Reality of the damage – Causal link)cjeu_case · 10 декабря 2025 г.
2965Case T-275/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 December 2025 – V4 Holding v EUIPO – V4 Financial Partners (V4 Financial Partners) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark V4 Financial Partners – Earlier national figurative mark V4 – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 10 декабря 2025 г.
2966Case T-274/24: Judgment of the General Court of 10 December 2025 – V4 Holding v EUIPO – V4 Financial Partners (V4 Financial Partners) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark V4 Financial Partners – Earlier national figurative mark V4 – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 10 декабря 2025 г.
2967Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 December 2025.#Intel Corporation Inc. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Microprocessors market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – ‘Naked’ restrictions – Consequences of the annulment in part of an earlier decision – Nature of the infringement – Amount of the fine – 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Proportionality – Whether appropriate – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-1129/23.cjeu_case · 10 декабря 2025 г.
2968Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 December 2025.#Intel Corporation Inc. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Microprocessors market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – ‘Naked’ restrictions – Consequences of the annulment in part of an earlier decision – Nature of the infringement – Amount of the fine – 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Proportionality – Whether appropriate – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-1129/23.cjeu_case · 10 декабря 2025 г.
2969Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 December 2025.#Middle East Bank, Munich Branch v European Commission.#Commercial policy – Protection against the effects of the extraterritorial application of legislation adopted by a third country – Restrictive measures taken by the United States against Iran – Secondary sanctions preventing natural or legal persons of the European Union from having commercial relationships with undertakings targeted by those measures – Prohibition on complying with such legislation – Second paragraph of Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2271/96 – Commission decision authorising a legal person of the European Union to comply with that legislation – Notification of the decision to the undertaking targeted by the restrictive measures of the third country – Retroactive effect – Account taken of that undertaking’s activities excluded from the scope of those measures.#Case T-518/23.cjeu_case · 10 декабря 2025 г.
2970Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 December 2025.#Middle East Bank, Munich Branch v European Commission.#Commercial policy – Protection against the effects of the extraterritorial application of legislation adopted by a third country – Restrictive measures taken by the United States against Iran – Secondary sanctions preventing natural or legal persons of the European Union from having commercial relationships with undertakings targeted by those measures – Prohibition on complying with such legislation – Second paragraph of Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2271/96 – Commission decision authorising a legal person of the European Union to comply with that legislation – Notification of the decision to the undertaking targeted by the restrictive measures of the third country – Retroactive effect – Account taken of that undertaking’s activities excluded from the scope of those measures.#Case T-518/23.cjeu_case · 10 декабря 2025 г.
2971Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 December 2025.#Bategu Gummitechnologie GmbH v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Bogie components – Decision rejecting a complaint – Regulation (EU) No 1302/2014 – Technical specification for interoperability relating to the rolling stock subsystem – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Misuse of powers – Principle of good administration.#Case T-219/23.cjeu_case · 10 декабря 2025 г.
2972Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 December 2025.#Bategu Gummitechnologie GmbH v European Commission.#Case T-219/23.cjeu_case · 10 декабря 2025 г.
2973Case T-1129/23: Judgment of the General Court of 10 December 2025 – Intel Corporation v Commission (Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Microprocessors market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Naked restrictions – Consequences of the annulment in part of an earlier decision – Nature of the infringement – Amount of the fine – 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Proportionality – Whether appropriate – Unlimited jurisdiction)cjeu_case · 10 декабря 2025 г.
2974Case T-518/23: Judgment of the General Court of 10 December 2025 – Middle East Bank, Munich Branch v Commission (Commercial policy – Protection against the effects of the extraterritorial application of legislation adopted by a third country – Restrictive measures taken by the United States against Iran – Secondary sanctions preventing natural or legal persons of the European Union from having commercial relationships with undertakings targeted by those measures – Prohibition on complying with such legislation – Second paragraph of Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2271/96 – Commission decision authorising a legal person of the European Union to comply with that legislation – Notification of the decision to the undertaking targeted by the restrictive measures of the third country – Retroactive effect – Account taken of that undertaking’s activities excluded from the scope of those measures)cjeu_case · 10 декабря 2025 г.
2975Case T-219/23: Judgment of the General Court of 10 December 2025 – Bategu Gummitechnologie v Commission (Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Bogie components – Decision rejecting a complaint – Regulation (EU) No 1302/2014 – Technical specification for interoperability relating to the rolling stock subsystem – Error of law – Manifest error of assessment – Misuse of powers – Principle of good administration)cjeu_case · 10 декабря 2025 г.
2976Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 December 2025.#Silex Ipari Automatizálási Zrt. (Silex Zrt.) v European Commission.#Research and technological development – Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) – Recovery of sums unduly paid under a grant agreement – Challenge as to the validity of a contractual debt which has become final – Legal certainty – Inadmissible plea – Principle of good administration – Duty of diligence.#Case T-653/22.cjeu_case · 10 декабря 2025 г.
2977Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 December 2025.#Silex Ipari Automatizálási Zrt. (Silex Zrt.) v European Commission.#Case T-653/22.cjeu_case · 10 декабря 2025 г.
2978Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 December 2025.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Portuguese air transport market – Restructuring aid granted by Portugal to TAP SGPS and TAP Air Portugal – Commission decision authorising aid under Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring undertakings in difficulty – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-458/22.cjeu_case · 10 декабря 2025 г.
2979Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 December 2025.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Portuguese air transport market – Restructuring aid granted by Portugal to TAP SGPS and TAP Air Portugal – Commission decision authorising aid under Article 107(3)(c) TFEU – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring undertakings in difficulty – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-458/22.cjeu_case · 10 декабря 2025 г.
2980Case T-653/22: Judgment of the General Court of 10 December 2025 – Silex v Commission (Research and technological development – Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) – Recovery of sums unduly paid under to a grant agreement – Challenge as to the validity of a contractual debt which has become final – Legal certainty – Inadmissible plea – Principle of good administration – Duty of diligence)cjeu_case · 10 декабря 2025 г.