Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
29601

Cases T-516/18 and T-525/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2021 — Luxembourg and Others v Commission (State aid — Aid implemented by Luxembourg in favour of ENGIE — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering its recovery — Tax rulings — State resources — Advantage — Combined effect of two tax measures — Participation exemption regime — Taxation of profit distributions — Abuse of law — Selectivity — Reference framework — Finding of a derogation — Comparability of situations — Parent-subsidiary arrangement — Group of companies — Recovery — Indirect harmonisation — Procedural rights — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
29602

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 May 2021.#Grand Duchy of Luxembourg , Amazon EU Sàrl and Amazon.com, Inc. v European Commission.#State aid – Aid implemented by Luxembourg in favour of Amazon – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering its recovery – Tax ruling – Transfer pricing – Selective tax advantage – Transfer pricing arrangement – Functional analysis.#Case T-816/17 and T-318/18.

cjeu_case ·
29603

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 May 2021.#Grand Duchy of Luxembourg , Amazon EU Sàrl and Amazon.com, Inc. v European Commission.#State aid – Aid implemented by Luxembourg in favour of Amazon – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering its recovery – Tax ruling – Transfer pricing – Selective tax advantage – Transfer pricing arrangement – Functional analysis.#Case T-816/17 and T-318/18.

cjeu_case ·
29604

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 May 2021.#Ruben Alba Aguilera and Others v European External Action Service.#Civil service – Officials – Members of the temporary staff – Members of the contract staff – Remuneration – EEAS staff posted to a third country – Article 10 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations – Annual assessment of the allowance for living conditions – Decision reducing the allowance for living conditions in Ethiopia from 30% to 25% – Regional coherence – Manifest errors of assessment.#Case T-119/17 RENV.

cjeu_case ·
29605

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 May 2021.#Ruben Alba Aguilera and Others v European External Action Service.#Civil service – Officials – Members of the temporary staff – Members of the contract staff – Remuneration – EEAS staff posted to a third country – Article 10 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations – Annual assessment of the allowance for living conditions – Decision reducing the allowance for living conditions in Ethiopia from 30% to 25% – Regional coherence – Manifest errors of assessment.#Case T-119/17 RENV.

cjeu_case ·
29607

Case T-119/17 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 12 May 2021 — Alba Aguilera and Others v EEAS (Civil service — Officials — Temporary agents — Contract staff — Remuneration — EEAS staff posted to a third country — Article 10 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations — Annual assessment of allowance for living conditions — Decision on reduction of the allowance for living conditions for staff posted to Ethiopia from 30 to 25 % — Regional coherence — Manifest errors of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
29614

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 May 2021.#Criminal proceedings against XXX and YYY.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Values and objectives of the European Union – Rule of law – Respect for human rights – Principle that penalties must have a proper legal basis – National legislation criminalising an act carried out in breach of any law – Lack of connection with EU law – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-580/20.

cjeu_case ·
29615

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 May 2021.#Criminal proceedings against XXX and YYY.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Neamţ.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Values and objectives of the European Union – Rule of law – Respect for human rights – Principle that penalties must have a proper legal basis – National legislation criminalising an act carried out in breach of any law – Lack of connection with EU law – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-580/20.

cjeu_case ·