29521Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 May 2021.#Electrodomesticos Taurus, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application of a declaratory nature – Application for directions to be issued – Inadmissibility.#Case T-328/20.cjeu_case · 17 мая 2021 г.
29522Case T-672/20: Order of the General Court of 17 May 2021 — Kerstens v Commission (Action for annulment — Civil service — Officials — Request for assistance — Rejection of the complaint — Time limit for bringing an action — Starting point — Date on which the person concerned could have known the content of the decision — Delay — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 17 мая 2021 г.
29523Case T-328/20: Order of the General Court of 17 May 2021 — Electrodomésticos Taurus v EUIPO — Shenzhen Aukey E-Business (AICOOK) (Action for annulment — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application of a declaratory nature — Application for directions to be issued — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 17 мая 2021 г.
29524Case T-256/21: Action brought on 15 May 2021 — Domator24.com Paweł Nowak v EUIPO — Siwek and Didyk (Chairs)cjeu_case · 15 мая 2021 г.
29526Case C-308/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca dos Açores (Portugal) lodged on 14 May 2021 — KU and Others v SATA International — Azores Airlines SAcjeu_case · 14 мая 2021 г.
29527Case C-307/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Kleve (Germany) lodged on 14 May 2021 — AB and Others v Ryanair DACcjeu_case · 14 мая 2021 г.
29530Case T-260/21: Action brought on 12 May 2021 — E. Breuninger v Commissioncjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29531Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 12 May 2021.#BSH Hausgeräte GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-67/21 P.cjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29532Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 12 May 2021.#BSH Hausgeräte GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-67/21 P.cjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29533Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 12 May 2021.#Topcart GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-49/21 P.cjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29534Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 12 May 2021.#Topcart GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-49/21 P.cjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29535Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 12 May 2021.#Topcart GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-48/21 P.cjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29536Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 12 May 2021.#Topcart GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-48/21 P.cjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29537Case C-309/21 P: Appeal brought on 12 May 2021 by Graanhandel P. van Schelven BV against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 24 March 2021 in Case T-306/19, Graanhandel P. van Schelven v Commissioncjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29538Case C-306/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 12 May 2021 — Komisia za zashtita na lichnite danni, Tsentralna izbiratelna komisia v Koalitsia ‘Demokratichna Bulgaria — Оbedinenie’cjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29539Case C-305/21 P: Appeal brought on 12 May 2021 by João Miguel Barata against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 3 March 2021 in Case T-723/18, Barata v Parliamentcjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.
29540Case C-304/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 12 May 2021 — VT v Ministero dell’Interno, Ministero dell’Interno — Dipartimento della Pubblica Sicurezza — Direzione centrale per le risorse umanecjeu_case · 12 мая 2021 г.