29481Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 May 2021.#Steinel GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark GluePro – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-256/20.cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.
29482Case T-643/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2021 — Ryanair v Commission (KLM; Covid-19) (State aid — Netherlands — State guarantee for loans and subordinated loan by the State to KLM amid the COVID-19 pandemic — Temporary Framework for State aid measures — Decision not to raise any objections — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market — Aid granted previously to another company in the same group of companies — Duty to state reasons — Maintenance of the effects of the decision)cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.
29483Case T-628/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2021 — Ryanair v Commission (Spain; Covid-19) (State aid — Spain — Recapitalisation measures to support undertakings that are systemic and strategic for the Spanish economy in response to the COVID-19 pandemic — Decision not to raise any objections — Temporary Framework for State aid — Measure aimed at remedying a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State — Measure aimed at the whole of the economy of a Member State — Principle of non-discrimination — Freedom to provide services and freedom of establishment — Proportionality — Criterion requiring that the beneficiaries of the aid are established in Spain — Failure to weigh the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition — Article 107(3)(b) TFEU — Concept of ‘aid scheme’ — Obligation to state reasons)cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.
29484Case T-535/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2021 — Müller v EUIPO (TIER SHOP) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark TIER SHOP — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Interest in bringing proceedings — Obligation to state reasons — Article 72(4) and the first sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.
29485Case T-465/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2021 — Ryanair v Commission (TAP; Covid-19) (State aid — Portuguese air transport market — Aid provided by Portugal to TAP owing to the COVID-19 pandemic — State loan — Decision not to raise any objections — Point 22 of the Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty — Company belonging to a group — Intrinsic difficulties not resulting from an arbitrary allocation of costs within the group — Difficulties which are too serious to be dealt with by the group itself — Duty to state reasons — Maintenance of the effects of the decision)cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.
29486Case T-324/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2021 — Yongkang Kugooo Technology v EUIPO — Ford Motor Company (kugoo) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark kugoo — Earlier EU and national word marks KUGA and earlier EU word mark KUGA ENERGI — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.
29487Case T-256/20: Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2021 — Steinel v EUIPO (GluePro) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark GluePro — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.
29488Case C-1/20: Order of the President of the Court of 19 May 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — B v Finanzamt Österreich, formerly Finanzamt Wien 9/18/19cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.
29489Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 May 2021.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark representing a bounding feline – Earlier international figurative marks representing a bounding feline – Relative ground for refusal – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-510/19.cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.
29490Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 May 2021.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark representing a bounding feline – Earlier international figurative marks representing a bounding feline – Relative ground for refusal – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-510/19.cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.
29491Case T-510/19: Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2021 — Puma v EUIPO — Gemma Group (Representation of a bounding feline) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark representing a bounding feline — Earlier international figurative marks representing a bounding feline — Relative ground for refusal — No injury to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.
29492Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 May 2021.#China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products and Others v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain cast iron articles originating in China – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Association – Standing to bring proceedings – Interest in bringing proceedings – Injury determination – Calculation of the import volume – Macroeconomic and microeconomic indicators – Sampling – Calculation of the EU industry’s cost of production – Prices charged intra-group – Causal link – Attribution and non-attribution analysis – No assessment of injury by segment – Assessment of the significance of undercutting – Confidential treatment of information – Rights of the defence – PCN-by-PCN methodology – Product comparability – Calculation of the normal value – Analogue country – Adjustment for VAT – Determination of the selling, general and administrative costs and profit.#Case T-254/18.cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.
29493Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 May 2021.#China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products and Others v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain cast iron articles originating in China – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Association – Standing to bring proceedings – Interest in bringing proceedings – Injury determination – Calculation of the import volume – Macroeconomic and microeconomic indicators – Sampling – Calculation of the EU industry’s cost of production – Prices charged intra-group – Causal link – Attribution and non-attribution analysis – No assessment of injury by segment – Assessment of the significance of undercutting – Confidential treatment of information – Rights of the defence – PCN-by-PCN methodology – Product comparability – Calculation of the normal value – Analogue country – Adjustment for VAT – Determination of the selling, general and administrative costs and profit.#Case T-254/18.cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.
29494Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 May 2021.#Deutsche Lufthansa AG v European Commission.#State aid – Aviation sector – Operational aid granted by Germany to Frankfurt-Hahn airport – Decision not to raise objections – Action for annulment – Status as an interested party – Safeguard of procedural rights – Admissibility – Guidelines on aid in the aviation sector – Doubts as to the compatibility of the aid with the internal market – Article 4(4) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Serious difficulties.#Case T-218/18.cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.
29495Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 May 2021.#Deutsche Lufthansa AG v European Commission.#State aid – Aviation sector – Operational aid granted by Germany to Frankfurt-Hahn airport – Decision not to raise objections – Action for annulment – Status as an interested party – Safeguard of procedural rights – Admissibility – Guidelines on aid in the aviation sector – Doubts as to the compatibility of the aid with the internal market – Article 4(4) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Serious difficulties.#Case T-218/18.cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.
29496Case T-254/18: Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2021 — China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products and Others v Commission (Dumping — Imports of certain cast iron articles originating in China — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Association — Standing to bring proceedings — Interest in bringing proceedings — Injury determination — Calculation of the import volume — Macroeconomic and microeconomic indicators — Sampling — Calculation of the EU industry’s cost of production — Prices charged intra-group — Causal link — Attribution and non-attribution analysis — No assessment of injury by segment — Assessment of the significance of undercutting — Confidential treatment of information — Rights of the defence — PCN-by-PCN methodology — Product comparability — Calculation of the normal value — Analogue country — Adjustment for VAT — Determination of the selling, general and administrative costs and profit)cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.
29497Case T-218/18: Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2021 — Deutsche Lufthansa v Commission (State aid — Aviation sector — Operational aid granted by Germany to Frankfurt-Hahn airport — Decision not to raise objections — Action for annulment — Status as an interested party — Safeguard of procedural rights — Admissibility — Guidelines on aid in the aviation sector — Doubts as to the compatibility of the aid with the internal market — Article 4(4) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Serious difficulties)cjeu_case · 19 мая 2021 г.
29498Case T-295/21: Action brought on 18 May 2021 — eSlovensko v Commissioncjeu_case · 18 мая 2021 г.
29500Case T-265/21: Action brought on 18 May 2021 — Sunshine Smile v EUIPO (PlusDental+)cjeu_case · 18 мая 2021 г.