29321Case T-307/21: Action brought on 1 June 2021 — Classen Holz Kontor v EUIPO — Deutsche Steinzeug Cremer & Breuer AG (DRYTILE)cjeu_case · 1 июня 2021 г.
29322Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 June 2021.#UP v Banco Santander SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Mortgage loan agreement – Unfair terms – Term limiting the variability of the interest rate (so-called ‘floor’ clause) – Novation agreement – No binding character.#Case C-268/19.cjeu_case · 1 июня 2021 г.
29323Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 June 2021.#UP v Banco Santander SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Orense.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Mortgage loan agreement – Unfair terms – Term limiting the variability of the interest rate (so-called ‘floor’ clause) – Novation agreement – No binding character.#Case C-268/19.cjeu_case · 1 июня 2021 г.
29324Case C-268/19: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 7 de Orense — Spain) — UP v Banco Santander SA, formerly Banco Pastor SAU (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Mortgage loan agreement — Unfair terms — Term limiting the variability of the interest rate (so-called ‘floor’ clause) — Novation agreement — No binding character)cjeu_case · 1 июня 2021 г.
29327Case C-339/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 31 May 2021 — Colt Technology Services SpA, Wind Tre SpA, Telecom Italia SpA, Ministero dello Sviluppo economico, Ministero della Giustizia, Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Roma, Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Cagliari, Procura generale della Repubblica presso la Corte d’appello di Reggio Calabria, Vodafone Italia SpA v Ministero della Giustizia, Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Procura Generale della Repubblica (presso Corte d’appello di Reggio Calabria), Procura della Repubblica di Cagliari, Procura della Repubblica (presso il Tribunale di Roma), Procura della Repubblica (presso il Tribunale di Locri)cjeu_case · 31 мая 2021 г.
29328Case C-338/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 31 May 2021 — Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid, other parties: S.S., N.Z., S.S.cjeu_case · 31 мая 2021 г.
29329Case C-337/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 31 May 2021 — FH v SunExpress Günes Ekspres Havacilik A.S.cjeu_case · 31 мая 2021 г.
29330Case C-172/21: Order of the President of the Court of 31 May 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln — Germany) — EF v Deutsche Lufthansa AGcjeu_case · 31 мая 2021 г.
29331Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 31 May 2021.#König Ludwig International GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark Royal Bavarian Beer – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Unitary character of the EU trade mark – Article 1(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-332/20.cjeu_case · 31 мая 2021 г.
29332Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 31 May 2021.#König Ludwig International GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark Royal Bavarian Beer – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Unitary character of the EU trade mark – Article 1(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-332/20.cjeu_case · 31 мая 2021 г.
29333Case T-332/20: Order of the General Court of 31 May 2021 — König Ludwig International v EUIPO (Royal Bavarian Beer) (EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark Royal Bavarian Beer — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Right to be heard — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Unitary character of the EU trade mark — Article 1(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 31 мая 2021 г.
29334Case C-618/20: Order of the President of the Court of 31 May 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 1 de Córdoba — Spain) — ZU, TV v Ryanair Ltdcjeu_case · 31 мая 2021 г.
29335Case T-304/21: Action brought on 30 May 2021 — eSlovensko Bratislava v Commissioncjeu_case · 30 мая 2021 г.
29336Case T-25/21: Order of the General Court of 28 May 2021 — Corman v Commissioncjeu_case · 28 мая 2021 г.
29337Case C-352/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 28 May 2021 — A1 and A2 v Icjeu_case · 28 мая 2021 г.
29338Case T-376/20: Order of the General Court of 28 May 2021 — Poupart v Commissioncjeu_case · 28 мая 2021 г.
29339Case T-260/18: Order of the General Court of 28 May 2021 — Makhlouf v Commission and ECB (Non-contractual liability — Economic and monetary policy — Stability support programme for Cyprus — Memorandum of Understanding of 26 April 2013 on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality concluded between the Republic of Cyprus and the European Stability Mechanism — Applicant having ceased to reply to the Court’s requests — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 28 мая 2021 г.
29340Case T-302/21: Action brought on 27 May 2021 — ABOCA and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · 27 мая 2021 г.