Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
29193

Ordonnance de la Cour (première chambre) du 3 juin 2021.#J.A. contre Republika Slovenija.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Politique d’immigration et d’asile – Protection internationale – Directive 2013/33/UE – Article 8, paragraphe 3, premier alinéa, sous d) – Placement en rétention des demandeurs de protection internationale – Demandeur placé en rétention dans le cadre d’une procédure de retour au titre de la directive 2008/115/CE et pour lequel il existe des motifs raisonnables de penser qu’il a présenté la demande de protection internationale à la seule fin de retarder ou d’empêcher l’exécution de la décision de retour – Critères objectifs permettant de fonder de tels motifs – Demandeur ayant déjà eu la possibilité d’accéder à la procédure d’asile.#Affaire C-186/21 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
29194

Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 June 2021.#J.A. v Republika Slovenija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravno sodišče Republike Slovenije.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Immigration and asylum policy – International protection – Directive 2013/33/EU – Point (d) of the first subparagraph of Article 8(3) – Detention of applicants for international protection – Applicant detained subject to a return procedure under Directive 2008/115/EC and in respect of whom there are reasonable grounds to believe that he or she is making the application for international protection merely in order to delay or frustrate the enforcement of the return decision – Objective criteria on which such grounds may be based – Applicant who has already had the opportunity to access the asylum procedure.#Case C-186/21 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
29197

Case C-186/21 PPU: Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravno sodišče Republike Slovenije — Slovenia) — J.A. v Republika Slovenija (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Immigration and asylum policy — International protection — Directive 2013/33/EU — Point (d) of the first subparagraph of Article 8(3) — Detention of applicants for international protection — Applicant detained subject to a return procedure under Directive 2008/115/EC and in respect of whom there are reasonable grounds to believe that he is making the application for international protection merely in order to delay or frustrate the enforcement of the return decision — Objective criteria on which such grounds may be based — Applicant who has already had the opportunity to access the asylum procedure)

cjeu_case ·
29198

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 3 juin 2021.#ZN contre Generalno konsulstvo na Republika Bulgaria v grad Valensia, Kralstvo Ispania.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Détermination de la compétence internationale des juridictions d’un État membre – Article 5, paragraphe 1 – Travailleur ressortissant d’un État membre – Contrat conclu avec une représentation consulaire de cet État membre dans un autre État membre – Fonctions du travailleur – Absence de prérogatives de puissance publique.#Affaire C-280/20.

cjeu_case ·
29199

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 June 2021.#ZN v Generalno konsulstvo na Republika Bulgaria v grad Valensia, Kralstvo Ispania.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Determination of international jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State – Article 5(1) – Employee residing in a Member State – Contract concluded with a consular representation of that Member State in another Member State – Functions of the employee – No exercise of public powers.#Case C-280/20.

cjeu_case ·
29200

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 June 2021.#Rad Service Srl Unipersonale and Others v Del Debbio SpA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement of service, supply and works contracts – Directive 2014/24/EU – Conduct of the procedure – Choice of participants and award of contracts – Article 63 – Tenderer relying on the capacities of another entity in order to meet the requirements of the contracting authority – Article 57(4), (6) and (7) – Untruthful declarations submitted by that entity – Exclusion of that tenderer without requiring or permitting it to replace that entity – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-210/20.

cjeu_case ·