2861Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d'admission des pourvois) du 15 décembre 2025.#bonnanwalt Vermögens- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande d’admission ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non‑admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-433/25 P.cjeu_case · 15 декабря 2025 г.
2862Case C-829/25 P: Appeal brought on 15 December 2025 by PMC Vlissingen Netherlands BV against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 8 October 2025 in Case T-169/24, PMC Vlissingen Netherlands v Commissioncjeu_case · 15 декабря 2025 г.
2863Case C-827/25: Action brought on 15 December 2025 – Czech Republic v European Parliament and Council of the European Unioncjeu_case · 15 декабря 2025 г.
2864Ordonnance du président du Tribunal du 12 décembre 2025.#Merck Europe BV contre Commission européenne.#Référé – Médicaments à usage humain – Autorisation de mise sur le marché du MAVENCLAD - cladribine – Demande d’assistance administrative concernant la portée et l’étendue de l’autorisation de mise sur le marché – Demande de sursis à exécution – Défaut d’urgence.#Affaire T-637/25 R.cjeu_case · 12 декабря 2025 г.
2865Order of the President of the General Court of 12 December 2025.#Merck Europe BV v European Commission.#Interim relief – Medicinal products for human use – Marketing authorisation for MAVENCLAD - cladribine – Request for administrative assistance concerning the scope and extent of the marketing authorisation – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency.#Case T-637/25 R.cjeu_case · 12 декабря 2025 г.
2867Case T-637/25 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 12 December 2025 – Merck Europe v Commission (Interim relief – Medicinal products for human use – Marketing authorisation for MAVENCLAD – cladribine – Request for administrative assistance concerning the scope and extent of the marketing authorisation – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency)cjeu_case · 12 декабря 2025 г.
2868Case C-823/25: Action brought on 12 December 2025 – European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlandscjeu_case · 12 декабря 2025 г.
2869Case C-822/25, Lealral: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça (Portugal) lodged on 12 December 2025 – AL, MO, BT, YO v Estate of EQ, represented by HT and HTcjeu_case · 12 декабря 2025 г.
2870Case C-820/25, Eurogine: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 12 December 2025 – DV v Eurogine S.L.cjeu_case · 12 декабря 2025 г.
2871Case C-819/25, Gonrieh: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 12 December 2025 – Mrs X and Mr Y, acting on their own behalf and in their capacity as legal representatives of A, B, C and D v Belgian Statecjeu_case · 12 декабря 2025 г.
2872Case C-816/25, Korventus: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Politierechtbank Oost-Vlaanderen (Belgium) lodged on 12 December 2025 – Criminal proceedings against DS, Mantra BVcjeu_case · 12 декабря 2025 г.
2873Rectificatif à la demande de décision préjudicielle présentée par le Landgericht Düsseldorf (Allemagne) le 1er septembre 2025 – Suzhou Anri Child Products Co. Ltd./Cybex GmbH (Affaire C-573/25, Suzhou Anri Child Products) (JO C, C/2025/5944, 17.11.2025)cjeu_case · 12 декабря 2025 г.
2874Ordonnance de la Cour (septième chambre) du 12 décembre 2025.#B. B. contre Ministarstvo pravosuđa, uprave i digitalne transformacije Republike Hrvatske.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence – Rémunération des juges de première instance – Article 19, paragraphe 1, deuxième alinéa, TUE – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Principe d’indépendance des juges – Compétence des pouvoirs législatif et exécutif des États membres pour fixer les modalités de détermination de la rémunération des juges – Exigence d’une rémunération en adéquation avec l’importance des fonctions exercées – Obligation de tenir compte du contexte socioéconomique national.#Affaire C-372/24.cjeu_case · 12 декабря 2025 г.
2875Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 December 2025.#B. B. v Ministarstvo pravosuđa, uprave i digitalne transformacije Republike Hrvatske.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravni sud u Rijeci.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Remuneration of judges of first instance – Article 19(1), second subparagraph, TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of judicial independence – Powers of the legislatures and executives of the Member States to set the detailed rules for determining judges’ remuneration – Requirement that remuneration is commensurate with the importance of the functions carried out – Obligation to take into account the national socio-economic context.#Case C-372/24.cjeu_case · 12 декабря 2025 г.
2876CaseC-372/24, Ministarstvo pravosuđa (Remuneration of Croatian judges of first instance): Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravni sud u Rijeci – Croatia) – B. B. v Ministarstvo pravosuđa, uprave i digitalne transformacije Republike Hrvatske (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Remuneration of judges of first instance – Article 19(1), second subparagraph, TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of judicial independence – Powers of the legislatures and executives of the Member States to set the detailed rules for determining judges’ remuneration – Requirement that remuneration is commensurate with the importance of the functions carried out – Obligation to take into account the national socio-economic context)cjeu_case · 12 декабря 2025 г.
2877Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 December 2025.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark HANDS FREE SLIP-INS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-254/25.cjeu_case · 11 декабря 2025 г.
2878Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 December 2025.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark HANDS FREE SLIP-INS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-254/25.cjeu_case · 11 декабря 2025 г.
2879Case T-858/25: Action brought on 11 December 2025 – Yachtic v EUIPO – Yachtico (Yachtico)cjeu_case · 11 декабря 2025 г.
2880Case T-254/25: Order of the General Court of 11 December 2025 – Skechers USA v EUIPO (HANDS FREE SLIP-INS) (EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark HANDS FREE SLIP-INS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 11 декабря 2025 г.