28701Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 1 July 2021.#European Commission v European Food SA and Others.#Appeal – State aid – Articles 107 and 108 TFEU – Bilateral Investment Treaty – Arbitration clause – Romania – Accession to the European Union – Repeal of a tax incentives scheme prior to accession – Arbitral award granting payment of damages after accession – European Commission decision declaring that payment to be State aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Competence of the European Commission – Application ratione temporis of EU law – Determination of the date at which the right to receive aid is conferred on the beneficiary – Article 19 TEU – Articles 267 and 344 TFEU – Autonomy of EU law.#Case C-638/19 P.cjeu_case · 1 июля 2021 г.
28702Case C-521/19: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 July 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Galicia — Spain) — CB v Tribunal Económico-Administrativo Regional de Galicia (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Tax inspection — Supply of services as an activity of an agent for performing artists — Transactions subject to VAT — Transactions not declared to the tax authority and not invoiced — Fraud — Reconstitution of the taxable amount for income tax purposes — Principle of VAT neutrality — Inclusion of VAT in the reconstituted taxable amount)cjeu_case · 1 июля 2021 г.
28703Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 July 2021.#NKT Verwaltungs GmbH and NKT A/S v European Commission.#Article 155 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Failure to adjudicate – None – Article 158 of the Rules of Procedure – Interpretation of a judgment – Inadmissibility.#Case C-607/18 P-OST.cjeu_case · 1 июля 2021 г.
28704Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 July 2021.#NKT Verwaltungs GmbH and NKT A/S v European Commission.#Article 155 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Failure to adjudicate – None – Article 158 of the Rules of Procedure – Interpretation of a judgment – Inadmissibility.#Case C-607/18 P-OST.cjeu_case · 1 июля 2021 г.
28705Case T-370/21: Action brought on 30 June 2021 — Biogena v EUIPO — Alter Farmacia (NUTRIFEN AGNUBALANCE)cjeu_case · 30 июня 2021 г.
28706Case T-369/21: Action brought on 30 June 2021 — Unimax Stationery v EUIPO — Mitsubishi Pencil (uni)cjeu_case · 30 июня 2021 г.
28707Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 June 2021.#Comprojecto-Projectos e Construções, Lda and Others v Court of Justice of the European Union and Others.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Appeal lodged out of time – Appeal brought against an order of the General Court of the European Union dismissing as inadmissible an application for rectification – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-21/21 P.cjeu_case · 30 июня 2021 г.
28708Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 June 2021.#Comprojecto-Projectos e Construções, Lda and Others v Court of Justice of the European Union and Others.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Appeal lodged out of time – Appeal brought against an order of the General Court of the European Union dismissing as inadmissible an application for rectification – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-21/21 P.cjeu_case · 30 июня 2021 г.
28709Case C-405/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Višje sodišče v Mariboru (Slovenia) lodged on 30 June 2021 — FV v NOVA KREDITNA BANKA MARIBOR d.d.cjeu_case · 30 июня 2021 г.
28710Case C-404/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Ordinario di Asti (Italy) lodged on 30 June 2021 — WP v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale, Repubblica italianacjeu_case · 30 июня 2021 г.
28711Case C-402/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 30 June 2021 — Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid, E, C; Other parties: S, Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheidcjeu_case · 30 июня 2021 г.
28712Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 30 June 2021.#Wolf Oil Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark ROLF – Earlier international mark Wolf – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard.#Case T-531/20.cjeu_case · 30 июня 2021 г.
28713Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 30 June 2021.#Wolf Oil Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark ROLF – Earlier international mark Wolf – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard.#Case T-531/20.cjeu_case · 30 июня 2021 г.
28714Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 June 2021.#Stefan Makk v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark PANTA RHEI – Earlier EU word mark PANTA RHEI – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-501/20.cjeu_case · 30 июня 2021 г.
28715Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 June 2021.#Stefan Makk v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark PANTA RHEI – Earlier EU word mark PANTA RHEI – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-501/20.cjeu_case · 30 июня 2021 г.
28716Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 June 2021.#Framery Oy v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Community design representing a transportable building – Earlier designs – Proof of disclosure – Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – No different overall impression – Article 6(1)(b) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-373/20.cjeu_case · 30 июня 2021 г.
28717Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 June 2021.#Framery Oy v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Community design representing a transportable building – Earlier designs – Proof of disclosure – Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – No different overall impression – Article 6(1)(b) and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-373/20.cjeu_case · 30 июня 2021 г.
28718Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 June 2021.#Acciona, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark REACCIONA – Genuine use of the mark – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Existence of domestic legal proceedings – No proper reason for non-use.#Case T-362/20.cjeu_case · 30 июня 2021 г.
28719Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 June 2021.#Acciona, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark REACCIONA – Genuine use of the mark – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Existence of domestic legal proceedings – No proper reason for non-use.#Case T-362/20.cjeu_case · 30 июня 2021 г.
28720Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 30 June 2021.#Ceramica Flaminia SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark goclean – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 52(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 52(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 59(2) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-290/20.cjeu_case · 30 июня 2021 г.