28561Case C-417/21 P: Appeal brought on 8 July 2021 by repowermap.org against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 28 April 2021 in Case T-872/16, repowermap.org v EUIPO and Repowercjeu_case · 8 июля 2021 г.
28562Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 July 2021.#UAB „Sanresa“ v Aplinkos apsaugos departamentas prie Aplinkos ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Award of a public contract for waste treatment services – Directive 2014/24/EU – Articles 58 and 70 – Classification of the operator’s obligation to hold written prior consent for cross-border shipments of waste – Condition of performance of the contract.#Case C-295/20.cjeu_case · 8 июля 2021 г.
28563Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 July 2021.#UAB „Sanresa“ v Aplinkos apsaugos departamentas prie Aplinkos ministerijos.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Award of a public contract for waste treatment services – Directive 2014/24/EU – Articles 58 and 70 – Classification of the operator’s obligation to hold written prior consent for cross-border shipments of waste – Condition of performance of the contract.#Case C-295/20.cjeu_case · 8 июля 2021 г.
28564Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 8 juillet 2021.#Pharma Expressz Szolgáltató és Kereskedelmi Kft contre Országos Gyógyszerészeti és Élelmezés-egészségügyi Intézet.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Libre circulation des marchandises – Médicaments à usage humain – Directive 2001/83/CE – Article 5, paragraphe 1, article 6, paragraphe 1, et articles 70 à 73 – Médicaments autorisés dans un premier État membre – Classification comme médicaments non soumis à prescription médicale – Vente dans les pharmacies d’un second État membre sans autorisation de mise sur le marché dans celui-ci – Réglementation nationale imposant une notification à l’autorité compétente et une déclaration de celle-ci sur l’usage de ce médicament – Article 34 TFUE – Restriction quantitative.#Affaire C-178/20.cjeu_case · 8 июля 2021 г.
28565Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 July 2021.#Pharma Expressz Szolgáltató és Kereskedelmi Kft v Országos Gyógyszerészeti és Élelmezés-egészségügyi Intézet.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of goods – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 5(1), Article 6(1) and Articles 70 to 73 – Medicinal products authorised in one Member State – Classification as medicinal products not subject to medical prescription – Sale in pharmacies of another Member State where the medicinal product does not have a marketing authorisation – National legislation requiring notification to be given to the competent authority and a declaration from that authority concerning the use of that medicinal product – Article 34 TFEU – Quantitative restriction.#Case C-178/20.cjeu_case · 8 июля 2021 г.
28566Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 8 juillet 2021.#BB contre Lietuvos Respublikos sveikatos apsaugos ministerija.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Reconnaissance des qualifications professionnelles – Directive 2005/36/CE – Article 1er et article 10, sous b) – Qualifications professionnelles obtenues dans plusieurs États membres – Conditions d’obtention – Absence de titre de formation – Articles 45 et 49 TFUE – Travailleurs – Liberté d’établissement.#Affaire C-166/20.cjeu_case · 8 июля 2021 г.
28567Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 July 2021.#BB v Lietuvos Respublikos sveikatos apsaugos ministerija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Recognition of professional qualifications – Directive 2005/36/EC – Article 1 and Article 10(b) – Professional qualifications obtained in several Member States – Conditions for obtaining – No formal evidence of qualifications – Articles 45 and 49 TFEU – Workers – Freedom of establishment.#Case C-166/20.cjeu_case · 8 июля 2021 г.
28568Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 July 2021.#Koleje Mazowieckie – KM Sp. z o.o. v Skarb Państwa – Minister Infrastruktury i Budownictwa obecnie Minister Infrastruktury i Prezes Urzędu Transportu Kolejowego and PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – Allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure – Directive 2001/14/EC – Article 4(5) – Charging – Article 30 – National regulatory body tasked with ensuring that infrastructure charges comply with that directive – Contract for use of infrastructure concluded between the infrastructure manager and a railway undertaking – Incorrect transposition – State liability – Claim for damages – Prior referral to the national regulatory body.#Case C-120/20.cjeu_case · 8 июля 2021 г.
28569Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 July 2021.#Koleje Mazowieckie – KM Sp. z o.o. v Skarb Państwa – Minister Infrastruktury i Budownictwa obecnie Minister Infrastruktury i Prezes Urzędu Transportu Kolejowego and PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – Allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure – Directive 2001/14/EC – Article 4(5) – Charging – Article 30 – National regulatory body tasked with ensuring that infrastructure charges comply with that directive – Contract for use of infrastructure concluded between the infrastructure manager and a railway undertaking – Incorrect transposition – State liability – Claim for damages – Prior referral to the national regulatory body.#Case C-120/20.cjeu_case · 8 июля 2021 г.
28570Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 July 2021.#Criminal proceedings against VAS Shipping ApS.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 49 and 54 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – National legislation requiring third-country nationals employed on a vessel flying the flag of a Member State to hold a work permit in that Member State – Exemption covering vessels that call at the Member State’s port no more than 25 times in a one-year period – Restriction – Article 79(5) TFEU – National legislation aimed at fixing the volumes of admission of third-country nationals coming from third countries to the territory of the Member State concerned in order to seek work, whether employed or self-employed.#Case C-71/20.cjeu_case · 8 июля 2021 г.
28571Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 July 2021.#Criminal proceedings against VAS Shipping ApS.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 49 and 54 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – National legislation requiring third-country nationals employed on a vessel flying the flag of a Member State to hold a work permit in that Member State – Exemption covering vessels that call at the Member State’s port no more than 25 times in a one-year period – Restriction – Article 79(5) TFEU – National legislation aimed at fixing the volumes of admission of third-country nationals coming from third countries to the territory of the Member State concerned in order to seek work, whether employed or self-employed.#Case C-71/20.cjeu_case · 8 июля 2021 г.
28572Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 8 July 2021.#RK v CR.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Köln.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Succession – Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 – Article 6(a) – Declining of jurisdiction – Article 7(a) – Jurisdiction – Examination by the court second seised – Article 22 – Choice of law applicable – Article 39 – Mutual recognition – Article 83(4) – Transitional provisions.#Case C-422/20.cjeu_case · 8 июля 2021 г.
28573Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 8 July 2021.#DM and LR v Caisse régionale de Crédit agricole mutuel (CRCAM) - Alpes-Provence.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Payment services in the internal market – Directive 2007/64/EC – Articles 58 and 60 – Payment service user – Notification of unauthorised payment transactions – Liability of the payment service provider for those transactions – Action for liability brought by the guarantor of a payment service user.#Case C-337/20.cjeu_case · 8 июля 2021 г.
28574Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 8 July 2021.#IB v FA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Paris.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Jurisdiction to hear divorce applications – Article 3(1)(a) – ‘Habitual residence’ of an applicant.#Case C-289/20.cjeu_case · 8 июля 2021 г.
28575Opinion of Advocate General Hogan delivered on 8 July 2021.#XXXX v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Overijssel.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2003/88/EC – Organisation of working time – Protection of the health and safety of workers – Article 7(1) – Right to paid annual leave – Level of remuneration – Reduced remuneration due to incapacity for work.#Case C-217/20.cjeu_case · 8 июля 2021 г.
28576Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 8 July 2021.#Zipvit Ltd v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 168 – Right of deduction – Supply of postal services mistakenly exempted – VAT deemed to be included in the commercial price of the supply for the purpose of exercising the right of deduction – Not included – Concept of VAT ‘due or paid’.#Case C-156/20.cjeu_case · 8 июля 2021 г.
28577Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 8 July 2021.#BN and Others v Getin Noble Bank S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Article 267 TFEU – Concept of court – Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Rule of law – Effective judicial protection – Principle of judicial independence – Tribunal previously established by law – Judicial body, a member of which was appointed for the first time to the position of judge by a political body within the executive branch of an undemocratic regime – Way in which the Krajowa Rada Sądownictwa (National Council of the Judiciary, Poland) operates – Unconstitutionality of the law on the basis of which that council was composed – Possibility of regarding that body as an impartial and independent court or tribunal within the meaning of EU law.#Case C-132/20.cjeu_case · 8 июля 2021 г.
28578Case C-295/20: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 July 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas — Lithuania) — ‘Sanresa’ UAB v Aplinkos apsaugos departamentas prie Aplinkos ministerijos (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Award of a public contract for waste treatment services — Directive 2014/24/EU — Articles 58 and 70 — Classification of the obligation on the operator to hold prior written consent for cross-border shipments of waste — Condition for the performance of the contract)cjeu_case · 8 июля 2021 г.
28579Case C-178/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 July 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Pharma Expressz Szolgáltató és Kereskedelmi Kft v Országos Gyógyszerészeti és Élelmezés-egészségügyi Intézet (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Free movement of goods — Medicinal products for human use — Directive 2001/83/EC — Article 5(1), Article 6(1), and Articles 70 to 73 — Medicinal products authorised in a first Member State — Classification as medicinal products not subject to medical prescription — Sale in pharmacies of a second Member State without marketing authorisation in that Member State — National legislation requiring notification to the competent authority and a declaration from that authority on the use of that medicinal product — Article 34 TFEU — Quantitative restriction)cjeu_case · 8 июля 2021 г.
28580Case C-166/20: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 July 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas- Lithuania) — BB v Lietuvos Respublikos sveikatos apsaugos ministerija (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Recognition of professional qualifications — Directive 2005/36/EC — Article 1 and Article 10(b) — Professional qualifications obtained in several Member States — Requirements for obtaining — No formal evidence of qualifications — Articles 45 and 49 TFEU — Workers — Freedom of establishment)cjeu_case · 8 июля 2021 г.