Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
28022

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 September 2021.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark GT RACING – Earlier EU figurative trade mark representing bold curved, vertical and horizontal lines – Earlier EU word mark GT – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Earlier non-registered national marks – Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Rules governing common-law action for passing off – No misrepresentation – Use in the course of trade of more than mere local significance – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom.#Case T-463/20.

cjeu_case ·
28023

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 September 2021.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark GT RACING – Earlier EU figurative trade mark representing bold curved, vertical and horizontal lines – Earlier EU word mark GT – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Earlier non-registered national marks – Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Rules governing common-law action for passing off – No misrepresentation – Use in the course of trade of more than mere local significance – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom.#Case T-463/20.

cjeu_case ·
28024

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 September 2021.#KN v European Economic and Social Committee.#Institutional law – Member of the EESC – OLAF investigation into allegations of psychological harassment – Decision to discharge a member from his duties involving the management and administration of staff – Action for annulment – Challengeable act – Admissibility – Measure taken in the interest of the service – Legal basis – Rights of the defence – Refusal of access to the annexes to the OLAF report – Disclosure of the substance of the witness statements in the form of a summary – Liability.#Case T-377/20.

cjeu_case ·
28025

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 September 2021.#KN v European Economic and Social Committee.#Institutional law – Member of the EESC – OLAF investigation into allegations of psychological harassment – Decision to discharge a member from his duties involving the management and administration of staff – Action for annulment – Challengeable act – Admissibility – Measure taken in the interest of the service – Legal basis – Rights of the defence – Refusal of access to the annexes to the OLAF report – Disclosure of the substance of the witness statements in the form of a summary – Liability.#Case T-377/20.

cjeu_case ·
28026

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 1 September 2021.#Gruppe Nymphenburg Consult AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark Limbic® Types – Absolute grounds for refusal – Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Referral to the Grand Board of Appeal – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Error of law – Examination of the facts of the Office’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Res judicata – Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Composition of the Grand Board of Appeal.#Case T-96/20.

cjeu_case ·
28027

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 1 September 2021.#Gruppe Nymphenburg Consult AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark Limbic® Types – Absolute grounds for refusal – Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Referral to the Grand Board of Appeal – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Error of law – Examination of the facts of the Office’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Res judicata – Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Composition of the Grand Board of Appeal.#Case T-96/20.

cjeu_case ·
28028

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 1 September 2021.#FF IP Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark the DoubleF – Earlier EU word mark THE DOUBLE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Relevant public – Similarity of the goods – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-23/20.

cjeu_case ·
28029

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 1 September 2021.#FF IP Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark the DoubleF – Earlier EU word mark THE DOUBLE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Relevant public – Similarity of the goods – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-23/20.

cjeu_case ·
28030

Case T-697/20: Judgment of the General Court of 1 September 2021 — Bimbo Donuts Iberia v EUIPO — Hijos de Antonio Juan (DONAS DULCESOL) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark DONAS DULCESOL — Earlier national word mark DONAS — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Lack of proof of genuine use of earlier mark — Classification of the goods in respect of which genuine use has been shown — Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
28031

Case T-566/20: Judgment of the General Court of 1 September 2021 — Residencial Palladium v EUIPO — Palladium Gestión (PALLADIUM HOTEL GARDEN BEACH) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark PALLADIUM HOTEL GARDEN BEACH — Earlier national trade name GRAND HOTEL PALLADIUM — Relative Ground for refusal — Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance — Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
28033

Case T-463/20: Judgment of the General Court of 1 September 2021 — Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe v EUIPO — Wong (GT RACING) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark GT RACING — Earlier EU figurative trade mark representing bold curved, vertical and horizontal lines — Earlier EU word mark GT — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Earlier non-registered national marks — Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Rules governing common-law action for passing off — No misrepresentation — Use in the course of trade of more than mere local significance — Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom)

cjeu_case ·
28034

Case T-377/20: Judgment of the General Court of 1 September 2021 — KN v EESC (Law governing the institutions — Member of the EESC — OLAF investigation into allegations of psychological harassment — Decision to discharge a member from his or her supervisory and personnel management activities — Action for annulment — Challengeable act — Admissibility — Measure taken in the interest of the service — Legal basis — Rights of the defence — Refusal to grant access to the annnexes to the OLAF report — Disclosure of the substance of the witness statements in the form of a summary — Liability)

cjeu_case ·
28035

Case T-96/20: Judgment of the General Court of 1 September 2021 — Gruppe Nymphenburg Consult v EUIPO (Limbic® Types) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Limbic® Types — Absolute grounds for refusal — Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court — Referral of the case back to the Grand Board of Appeal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Error of law — Examination of the facts of the Office’s own motion — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Res judicata — Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Composition of the Grand Board of Appeal)

cjeu_case ·
28036

Case T-23/20: Judgment of the General Court of 1 September 2021 — FF IP v EUIPO — Seven (the DoubleF) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark the DoubleF — Earlier EU word mark THE DOUBLE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Relevant public — Similarity of the goods — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
28038

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 September 2021.#Proceedings brought by OKR.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Notariusz w Krapkowicach Justyna Gawlica - Krapkowice.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Notary acting as a deputy for another notary – Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-387/20.

cjeu_case ·
28039

Case C-387/20: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Zastępca notarialny w Krapkowicach Marcin Margoński, on behalf of Justyna Gawlica, Notariusz w Krapkowicach — Poland) — Proceedings brought by OKR (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Article 267 TFEU — Notary acting as a deputy for another notary — Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ — Criteria — Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)

cjeu_case ·