27921Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#Peek & Cloppenburg KG, v Peek & Cloppenburg KG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2005/29/EC – Unfair commercial practices – Commercial practices deemed to be unfair in all circumstances – Misleading commercial practices – First sentence of point 11 of Annex I – Advertising campaigns – Use of editorial content in the media to promote a product – Promotion financed by the trader itself – Concept of ‘payment’ – Promotion of sales of the products of the media operator company and of the trader – Advertorial.#Case C-371/20.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2021 г.
27922Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#O.D. and Others v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/98/EU – Rights for third-country workers who hold single permits – Article 12 – Right to equal treatment – Social security – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Coordination of social security systems – Article 3 – Maternity and paternity benefits – Family benefits – Legislation of a Member State excluding third-country nationals holding a single permit from entitlement to a childbirth allowance and a maternity allowance.#Case C-350/20.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2021 г.
27923Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#O.D. and Others v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte costituzionale.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/98/EU – Rights for third-country workers who hold single permits – Article 12 – Right to equal treatment – Social security – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Coordination of social security systems – Article 3 – Maternity and paternity benefits – Family benefits – Legislation of a Member State excluding third-country nationals holding a single permit from entitlement to a childbirth allowance and a maternity allowance.#Case C-350/20.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2021 г.
27924Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#DM and LR v Caisse régionale de Crédit agricole mutuel (CRCAM) - Alpes-Provence.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Payment services in the internal market – Directive 2007/64/EC – Articles 58 and 60 – Payment service user – Notification of unauthorised payment transactions – Liability of the payment service provider for those transactions – Action for liability brought by the guarantor of a payment service user.#Case C-337/20.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2021 г.
27925Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#DM and LR v Caisse régionale de Crédit agricole mutuel (CRCAM) - Alpes-Provence.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Payment services in the internal market – Directive 2007/64/EC – Articles 58 and 60 – Payment service user – Notification of unauthorised payment transactions – Liability of the payment service provider for those transactions – Action for liability brought by the guarantor of a payment service user.#Case C-337/20.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2021 г.
27926Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#European Commission v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Decision (EU) 2020/245 and 2020/246 – Position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Partnership Council established by the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part – Agreement some provisions of which may be linked with the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) – Adoption of the Rules of Procedure of the Partnership Council and those of the Partnership Committee, subcommittees and other bodies – Adoption of two separate decisions – Choice of legal basis – Article 37 TEU – Article 218(9) TFEU – Voting rules.#Case C-180/20.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2021 г.
27927Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#European Commission v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Decision (EU) 2020/245 and 2020/246 – Position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Partnership Council established by the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part – Agreement some provisions of which may be linked with the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) – Adoption of the Rules of Procedure of the Partnership Council and those of the Partnership Committee, subcommittees and other bodies – Adoption of two separate decisions – Choice of legal basis – Article 37 TEU – Article 218(9) TFEU – Voting rules.#Case C-180/20.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2021 г.
27928Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#European Commission v Portuguese Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 110 TFEU – Internal taxation – Discriminatory taxation – Prohibition – Second-hand vehicles imported from other Member States – Component of the registration tax calculated on the basis of carbon dioxide emissions – Failure to take into account the depreciation of the vehicle.#Case C-169/20.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2021 г.
27929Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#European Commission v Portuguese Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 110 TFEU – Internal taxation – Discriminatory taxation – Prohibition – Second-hand vehicles imported from other Member States – Component of the registration tax calculated on the basis of carbon dioxide emissions – Failure to take into account the depreciation of the vehicle.#Case C-169/20.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2021 г.
27930Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 2 septembre 2021.#XK.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 267 TFUE – Notion de “juridiction nationale” – Critères – Procura della Repubblica di Trento (parquet de la République de Trente, Italie) – Irrecevabilité de la demande de décision préjudicielle.#Affaire C-66/20.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2021 г.
27931Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#XK.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Procura della Repubblica di Trento.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ – Criteria – Procura della Repubblica di Trento (Public Prosecutor’s Office, Trento, Italy) – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-66/20.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2021 г.
27932Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 2 septembre 2021.#Telekom Deutschland GmbH contre Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Communications électroniques – Règlement (UE) 2015/2120 – Article 3 – Accès à un internet ouvert – Article 3, paragraphe 1 – Droits des utilisateurs finals – Article 3, paragraphe 2 – Interdiction des accords et des pratiques commerciales limitant l’exercice des droits des utilisateurs finals – Article 3, paragraphe 3 – Obligation de traitement égal et non discriminatoire du trafic – Possibilité de mettre en œuvre des mesures raisonnables de gestion du trafic – Option tarifaire supplémentaire dite à “tarif nul” – Limitation de la bande passante.#Affaire C-34/20.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2021 г.
27933Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#Telekom Deutschland GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Köln.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications – Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 – Article 3 – Open internet access – Article 3(1) – End users’ rights – Article 3(2) – Prohibition of agreements and commercial practices limiting the exercise of end users’ rights – Article 3(3) – Obligation of equal and non-discriminatory treatment of traffic – Possibility of implementing reasonable traffic management measures – Additional ‘zero tariff’ option – Limitation on bandwidth.#Case C-34/20.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2021 г.
27934Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 2 septembre 2021.#Commission européenne contre Royaume de Suède.#Manquement d’État – Directive 91/271/CEE – Articles 4, 5, 10 et 15 – Traitement des eaux urbaines résiduaires – Traitement secondaire ou équivalent des eaux urbaines résiduaires provenant d’agglomérations de certaines dimensions – Traitement plus rigoureux des rejets dans des zones sensibles – Article 4, paragraphe 3, TUE – Vérification des données communiquées par les États membres – Obligation de coopération loyale.#Affaire C-22/20.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2021 г.
27935Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#European Commission v Kingdom of Sweden.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 91/271/EEC – Articles 4, 5, 10 and 15 – Urban waste water treatment – Secondary or equivalent treatment of urban waste water from agglomerations of certain dimensions – More stringent treatment of discharges into sensitive areas – Article 4(3) TEU – Verification of data provided by the Member States – Obligation of sincere cooperation.#Case C-22/20.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2021 г.
27936Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 2 septembre 2021.#Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände – Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV contre Vodafone GmbH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Communications électroniques – Règlement (UE) 2015/2120 – Article 3 – Accès à un internet ouvert – Article 3, paragraphe 1 – Droits des utilisateurs finals – Article 3, paragraphe 2 – Interdiction des accords et des pratiques commerciales limitant l’exercice des droits des utilisateurs finals – Article 3, paragraphe 3 – Obligation de traitement égal et non discriminatoire du trafic – Possibilité de mettre en œuvre des mesures raisonnables de gestion du trafic – Option tarifaire supplémentaire dite à “tarif nul” – Limitation du partage de connexion.#Affaire C-5/20.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2021 г.
27937Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 September 2021.#Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. v Vodafone GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications – Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 – Article 3 – Open internet access – Article 3(1) – End users’ rights – Article 3(2) – Prohibition of agreements and commercial practices limiting the exercise of end users’ rights – Article 3(3) – Obligation of equal and non-discriminatory treatment of traffic – Possibility of implementing reasonable traffic management measures – Additional ‘zero tariff’ option – Limitation on tethering.#Case C-5/20.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2021 г.
27938Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 2 September 2021.#Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. v Dr. August Oetker Nahrungsmittel KG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 – Provision of food information to consumers – Article 9(1)(l) – Nutrition declaration – Second subparagraph of Article 31(3) – Calculation of the energy value and of the amounts of nutrients – Possibility of providing that information for the food after preparation – Conditions – Second subparagraph of Article 33(2) – Expression on a per portion basis or per consumption unit.#Case C-388/20.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2021 г.
27939Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 2 September 2021.#D.P.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Łodzi-Śródmieścia w Łodzi.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Mutual recognition – Financial penalties – Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA – Grounds for non-recognition and non-execution – Article 20(3) – Decision imposing a financial penalty – Observance of the rights of the defence – Notification of documents in a language not understood by the sentenced person – Translation of the essential elements of the decision.#Case C-338/20.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2021 г.
27940Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 2 September 2021.#SIA 'MONO' v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Excise duty – Directive 2008/118/EC – Exemption from the harmonised excise duty – Goods intended to be used in the context of diplomatic and consular relations – Conditions for the exemption to apply laid down by the host Member State – Payment by non-cash means.#Case C-326/20.cjeu_case · 2 сентября 2021 г.