27761Case C-277/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Proceedings brought by UM (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Succession — Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 — Article 3(1)(b) — Concept of ‘agreement as to succession’ — Scope — Contract transferring ownership mortis causa — Article 83(2) — Choice of applicable law — Transitional provisions)cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2021 г.
27762Joined Cases C-208/20 and C-256/20: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 September 2021 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski Rayonen sad — Bulgaria) — ‘Toplofikatsia Sofia’ EAD, ‘CHEZ Elektro Bulgaria’ AD and ‘Agentsia za control na prosrocheni zadalzhenia’ EOOD (C-208/20); ‘Toplofikatsia Sofia’ EAD (C-256/20) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 20(2)(a) TFEU — Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 — Cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil and commercial matters — Article 1(1)(a) — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Article 5(1) — Outstanding debts — Legal decisions — Orders for payment — Service — Debtor residing at an unknown address in a Member State other than that of the court seised)cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2021 г.
27763Case C-144/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa — Latvia) — AS ‘LatRailNet’, ‘Latvijas dzelzceļš’ VAS v Valsts dzelzceļa administrācija (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Rail transport — Directive 2012/34/EU — Articles 32 and 56 — Railway infrastructure charging — Independence of the infrastructure manager — Functions of the regulatory body — Concept of ‘optimal competitiveness of rail market segments’ — Exclusive right to a rail segment — Public service operator)cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2021 г.
27764Case C-100/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — XY v Hauptzollamt B (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Taxation of energy products and electricity — Directive 2003/96/EC — Article 17(1)(a) — Tax reductions on the consumption of energy products and electricity in favour of energy-intensive businesses — Optional reduction — Arrangements governing the repayment of tax levied in breach of provisions of national law adopted on the basis of a power granted to the Member States in that directive — Payment of interest — Principle of equal treatment)cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2021 г.
27765Joined Cases C-33/20, C-155/20 and C-187/20: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 September 2021 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Ravensburg — Germany) — UK v Volkswagen Bank GmbH (C-33/20), RT, SV, BC v Volkswagen Bank GmbH, Skoda Bank, succursale de Volkswagen Bank GmbH (C-155/20), JL, DT v BMW Bank GmbH, Volkswagen Bank GmbH (C-187/20) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2008/48/EC — Consumer credit — Article 10(2) — Information which must be included in the agreement — Obligation to state the type of credit, the duration of the credit agreement, the rate of interest on arrears and the mechanism for adjusting the rate of interest on arrears applicable at the time of conclusion of the credit agreement — Change in the default interest rate in the light of a change in the base interest rate determined by the central bank of a Member State — Compensation due in the event of early repayment of the loan — Obligation to specify the method of calculating the change to the default interest rate and the compensation — No obligation to mention the possibilities for terminating the credit agreement provided for by national rules but not by Directive 2008/48 — Article 14(1) — Right of withdrawal exercised by the consumer on the basis of a failure to make a compulsory indication under Article 10(2) — Exercise outside the time limit — Prohibition on the creditor raising a plea of forfeiture or the plea of abuse of rights)cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2021 г.
27766Case C-18/20: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — XY (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Border controls, asylum and immigration — Asylum policy — Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 40 — Subsequent application — New elements or findings — Concept — Circumstances already existing before the final closure of a procedure concerning an earlier application for international protection — Principle of res judicata — Fault of the applicant)cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2021 г.
27767Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2021.#GABO:mi Gesellschaft für Ablauforganisation:milliarium mbH & Co. KG v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Sixth and Seventh Framework Programmes for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2002-2006 and 2007-2013) – ‘Horizon 2020’ Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) – Grant agreements – Set-off of claims – Identification of the defendant – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-881/19.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2021 г.
27768Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2021.#GABO:mi Gesellschaft für Ablauforganisation:milliarium mbH & Co. KG v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Sixth and Seventh Framework Programmes for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2002-2006 and 2007-2013) – ‘Horizon 2020’ Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) – Grant agreements – Set-off of claims – Identification of the defendant – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-881/19.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2021 г.
27769Case T-881/19: Order of the General Court of 9 September 2021 — GABO:mi v Commission (Arbitration clause — Sixth and Seventh Framework Programmes for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2002-2006 and 2007-2013) — ‘Horizon 2020’ Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) — Grant agreements — Set-off of claims — Identification of the defendant — Failure to comply with procedural requirements — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2021 г.
27770Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2021.#Criminal proceedings against FO.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Road transport – Harmonisation of certain social legislation – Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 – Article 3(a) – Non-application of the regulation to carriage by road by vehicles used for the carriage of passengers on regular services where the route covered by the service in question does not exceed 50 km – Mixed-use vehicle – Article 19(2) – Extraterritorial penalty – Infringement detected on the territory of a Member State committed on the territory of another Member State – Principle that offences and penalties must have a proper legal basis – Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 – Recording equipment in road transport – Article 15(2) – Obligation to insert the driver card – Article 15(7) – Obligation to produce the driver card whenever an authorising inspecting officer so requests – Failure to insert the driver card into the recording equipment affecting several of the 28 days preceding the day of inspection.#Case C-906/19.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2021 г.
27771Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2021.#Criminal proceedings against FO.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Road transport – Harmonisation of certain social legislation – Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 – Article 3(a) – Non-application of the regulation to carriage by road by vehicles used for the carriage of passengers on regular services where the route covered by the service in question does not exceed 50 km – Mixed-use vehicle – Article 19(2) – Extraterritorial penalty – Infringement detected on the territory of a Member State committed on the territory of another Member State – Principle that offences and penalties must have a proper legal basis – Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 – Recording equipment in road transport – Article 15(2) – Obligation to insert the driver card – Article 15(7) – Obligation to produce the driver card whenever an authorising inspecting officer so requests – Failure to insert the driver card into the recording equipment affecting several of the 28 days preceding the day of inspection.#Case C-906/19.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2021 г.
27772Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 9 septembre 2021.#G. Sp. z o.o. contre Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Bydgoszczy.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 69 – Exigibilité de la TVA – Acquisition intracommunautaire de carburants – Obligation de paiement anticipé de la TVA – Article 206 – Notion d’“acomptes provisionnels” – Article 273 – Exacte perception de la TVA et lutte contre la fraude – Marge de manœuvre des États membres.#Affaire C-855/19.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2021 г.
27773Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2021.#G. Sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Bydgoszczy.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 69 – Chargeability of VAT – Intra-Community acquisition of motor fuels – Obligation to make early payment of VAT – Article 206 – Concept of ‘interim payments’ – Article 273 – Correct collection of VAT and prevention of evasion – Discretion of the Member States.#Case C-855/19.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2021 г.
27774Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 9 septembre 2021.#Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne contre GB.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Agriculture – Protection des appellations d’origine et des indications géographiques – Caractère uniforme et exhaustif – Règlement (UE) no 1308/2013 – Article 103, paragraphe 2, sous a), ii) – Article 103, paragraphe 2, sous b) – Évocation – Appellation d’origine protégée (AOP) “Champagne” – Services – Comparabilité des produits – Utilisation de la dénomination commerciale “Champanillo”.#Affaire C-783/19.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2021 г.
27775Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2021.#Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne v GB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Protection of designations of origin and geographical indications – Uniform and exhaustive nature – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Article 103(2)(a)(ii) – Article 103(2)(b) – Evocation – Protected designation of origin (PDO) ‘Champagne’ – Services – Comparability of products – Use of the trade name ‘Champanillo’.#Case C-783/19.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2021 г.
27776Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 9 septembre 2021.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland contre SE.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique commune en matière d’asile et de protection subsidiaire – Directive 2011/95/UE – Article 2, sous j), troisième tiret – Notion de “membre de la famille” – Personne majeure demandant la protection internationale en raison de son lien familial avec un mineur ayant déjà obtenu la protection subsidiaire – Date pertinente pour apprécier la qualité de “mineur”.#Affaire C-768/19.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2021 г.
27777Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 September 2021.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland v SE.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection – Directive 2011/95/EU – Third indent of Article 2(j) – Concept of ‘family member’ – Adult applying for international protection on the basis of his or her family relationship with a minor who has already been granted subsidiary protection – Relevant date for assessing ‘minor’ status.#Case C-768/19.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2021 г.
27778Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 9 septembre 2021.#XR contre Dopravní podnik hl. m. Prahy, akciová společnost.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Directive 2003/88/CE – Aménagement du temps de travail – Notions de “temps de travail” et de “période de repos” – Période de pause pendant laquelle l’employé doit se tenir prêt à partir en intervention dans un délai de deux minutes – Primauté du droit de l’Union.#Affaire C-107/19.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2021 г.
27779Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 September 2021.#XR v Dopravní podnik hl. m. Prahy, a.s.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 9.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2003/88/EC – Organisation of working time – Concepts of ‘working time’ and ‘rest period’ – Break during which the employee must remain ready to respond to a call-out within a two-minute time limit – Primacy of EU law.#Case C-107/19.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2021 г.
27780Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 9 September 2021.#European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 4(3) TEU – Article 310(6) and Article 325 TFEU – Own resources – Customs duties – Value added tax (VAT) – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Combating fraud – Principle of effectiveness – Obligation for Member States to make own resources available to the European Commission – Financial liability of Member States in the event of losses of own resources – Imports of textiles and footwear from China – Large-scale and systematic fraud – Organised crime – Missing importers – Customs value – Undervaluation – Taxable amount for VAT purposes – Lack of systematic customs controls based on risk analysis and carried out prior to the release of the goods concerned – No systematic provision of security – Method used to estimate the amount of traditional own resources losses in respect of imports presenting a significant risk of undervaluation – Statistical method based on the average price determined at EU level – Whether permissible.#Case C-213/19.cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2021 г.