27701Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 September 2021.#Silex Ipari Automatizálási Zrt. (Silex Zrt.) v European Commission and European Innovation Council and SMEs Executive Agency.#Action for annulment – ‘Horizon 2020’ Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) – Debit note issued by EASME – Identification of the defendant – Inadmissibility.#Case T-654/20.cjeu_case · 14 сентября 2021 г.
27702Ordonnance du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 14 septembre 2021.#Silex Ipari Automatizálási Zrt. (Silex Zrt.) contre Commission européenne et Agence exécutive pour le Conseil européen de l’innovation et les PME.#Recours en annulation – Programme-cadre pour la recherche et l’innovation “Horizon 2020” (2014-2020) – Note de débit émise par l’EASME – Identification de la partie défenderesse – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-654/20.cjeu_case · 14 сентября 2021 г.
27703Case T-722/20: Order of the General Court of 14 September 2021 — Far Polymers and Others v Commission (Action for annulment — Dumping — Imports of certain polyvinyl alcohols originating in China — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Lack of direct concern — Lack of individual concern — Legislative act involving implementing measures — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 14 сентября 2021 г.
27704Case T-578/21: Action brought on 13 September 2021 — Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products and Koopman International (Fluid distribution equipment)cjeu_case · 13 сентября 2021 г.
27705Case T-577/21: Action brought on 13 September 2021 — Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products and Koopman International (Fluid distribution equipment)cjeu_case · 13 сентября 2021 г.
27706Case T-576/21: Action brought on 13 September 2021 — Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products and Koopman International (Fluid distribution equipment)cjeu_case · 13 сентября 2021 г.
27707Case T-575/21: Action brought on 13 September 2021 — Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products and Koopman International (Fluid distribution equipment)cjeu_case · 13 сентября 2021 г.
27708Case T-572/21: Action brought on 13 September 2021 — Copal Tree Brands v EUIPO — Sumol + Compal Marcas (COPAL TREE)cjeu_case · 13 сентября 2021 г.
27709Case C-570/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Woli w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 13 September 2021 — I.S., K.S. v YYY. S.A.cjeu_case · 13 сентября 2021 г.
27710Case C-560/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 13 September 2021 — ZS v Zweckverband ‘Kommunale Informationsverarbeitung Sachsen’ KISA, a body governed by public lawcjeu_case · 13 сентября 2021 г.
27711Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 September 2021.#Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Procedure – Application for revision – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Action against a decision of EUIPO partially refusing to register a mark – Withdrawal of the opposition before service of the order dismissing the action – Fact unknown to the applicant and to the General Court – Revision of the order – No need to adjudicate.#Case T-616/19 REV.cjeu_case · 13 сентября 2021 г.
27712Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 September 2021.#Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Procedure – Application for revision – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Action against a decision of EUIPO partially refusing to register a mark – Withdrawal of the opposition before service of the order dismissing the action – Fact unknown to the applicant and to the General Court – Revision of the order – No need to adjudicate.#Case T-616/19 REV.cjeu_case · 13 сентября 2021 г.
27713Case T-616/19 REV: Order of the General Court of 13 September 2021 — Katjes Fassin v EUIPO — Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium (WONDERLAND) (Procedure — Application for revision — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Action against a decision of EUIPO partially refusing to register a mark — Withdrawal of the opposition before service of the order dismissing the action — Fact unknown to the applicant and to the General Court — Revision of the order — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 13 сентября 2021 г.
27714Case T-586/21: Action brought on 12 September 2021 — Swords v Commissioncjeu_case · 12 сентября 2021 г.
27715Case T-569/21: Action brought on 10 September 2021 — Harbaoui v EUIPO — Google (GOOGLE CAR)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2021 г.
27716Case T-568/21: Action brought on 10 September 2021 — Harbaoui v EUIPO — Google (GC GOOGLE CAR)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2021 г.
27717Case C-561/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 10 September 2021 — GP and BG v Banco Santander, S. A.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2021 г.
27718Case C-557/21 P: Appeal brought on 10 September 2021 by Acciona, S.A. against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 30 June 2021 in Case T-362/20 Acciona v EUIPO — Agencia Negociadora PB (REACCIONA)cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2021 г.
27719Case C-556/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 10 September 2021 — Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid, other parties: E.N., S.S. and J.Y.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2021 г.
27720Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2021.#Verena Kühne v European Parliament.#Action for annulment – Civil service – Officials – Mobility regime – Request concerning the mobility obligation – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-691/20.cjeu_case · 10 сентября 2021 г.