27641Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Alex Kande Mupompa v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-97/20.cjeu_case · 15 сентября 2021 г.
27642Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Alex Kande Mupompa v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-97/20.cjeu_case · 15 сентября 2021 г.
27643Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Jean-Claude Kazembe Musonda v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-95/20.cjeu_case · 15 сентября 2021 г.
27644Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Jean-Claude Kazembe Musonda v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-95/20.cjeu_case · 15 сентября 2021 г.
27645Case T-702/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 — Beelow v EUIPO (made of wood) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark made of wood — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 15 сентября 2021 г.
27646Case T-688/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 — Freshly Cosmetics v EUIPO — Misiego Blázquez (IDENTY BEAUTY) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark IDENTY BEAUTY — Earlier national figurative mark IDENTITY THE IMAGE CLUB — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 15 сентября 2021 г.
27647Case T-673/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 — Celler Lagravera v EUIPO — Cyclic Beer Farm (Cíclic) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Cíclic — Earlier EU word mark CYCLIC — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 15 сентября 2021 г.
27648Case T-466/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 — LF v Commission (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — Remuneration — Expatriation allowance — Article 4(1)(b) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Refusal to grant the expatriation allowance — Habitual residence — Duties performed in an international organisation established in the State of employment)cjeu_case · 15 сентября 2021 г.
27649Case T-331/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 — Laboratorios Ern v EUIPO — Le-Vel Brands (Le-Vel) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Le-Vel — Earlier national word mark LEVEL — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity of the goods and services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 15 сентября 2021 г.
27650Case T-274/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 — MHCS v EUIPO — Lidl Stiftung (Shade of the colour orange) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Figurative EU mark depicting a shade of the colour orange — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Examination of the facts of the EUIPO’s own motion — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Nature of the mark — Colour mark — Right to be heard — Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 15 сентября 2021 г.
27651Case T-240/20 to T-245/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 — Arnaoutakis and Others v Parliament (Law governing the institutions — Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament — Amendment of the voluntary additional pension scheme — Refusal to grant a voluntary additional pension — Plea of illegality — Competence of the Bureau of the Parliament — Rights acquired and future entitlements — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Legal certainty)cjeu_case · 15 сентября 2021 г.
27652Case T-207/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 — Residencial Palladium v EUIPO — Palladium Gestión (PALLADIUM HOTELS & RESORTS) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark PALLADIUM HOTELS & RESORTS — Admissibility criteria for an application for a declaration of invalidity — Article 53(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 56(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 63(3) of Regulation 2017/1001))cjeu_case · 15 сентября 2021 г.
27653Case T-127/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 — France v ECHA (REACH — Substance evaluation — Aluminium chloride — Aluminium chloride, basic — Aluminium sulphate — ECHA decisions requesting further information — Article 46(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Appeal brought before the Board of Appeal — Multiple grounds for the decision of the Board of Appeal — Grounds capable of justifying the decision — Inoperative nature of the pleas directed against the other grounds)cjeu_case · 15 сентября 2021 г.
27654Case T-110/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 — Kanyama v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)cjeu_case · 15 сентября 2021 г.
27655Case T-109/20: Judgment of the General Court 15 September 2021 — Numbi v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)cjeu_case · 15 сентября 2021 г.
27656Case T-107/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 — Boshab v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)cjeu_case · 15 сентября 2021 г.
27657Case T-106/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 –Amisi Kumba v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)cjeu_case · 15 сентября 2021 г.
27658Case T-105/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 — Ruhorimbere v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)cjeu_case · 15 сентября 2021 г.
27659Case T-104/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 — Ramazani Shadary v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)cjeu_case · 15 сентября 2021 г.
27660Case T-103/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 –Mutondo v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States — Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded — Manifest error of assessment — Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures — Right to private and family life — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Plea of illegality)cjeu_case · 15 сентября 2021 г.