Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 315 документов
27521

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#Altice Europe NV v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – Telecommunications sector – Decision imposing fines for putting into effect a concentration before it has been notified and authorised – Article 4(1), Article 7(1) and Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Principle of legality – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Gravity of the infringements – Implementation of the infringements – Exchange of information – Amount of fines – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-425/18.

cjeu_case ·
27522

Case T-425/18: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — Altice Europe v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — Telecommunications sector — Decision imposing fines for putting into effect a concentration before it has been notified and authorised — Article 4(1), Article 7(1) and Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Principle of legality — Presumption of innocence — Proportionality — Gravity of the infringements — Implementation of the infringements — Exchange of information — Amount of fines — Unlimited jurisdiction)

cjeu_case ·
27523

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#PAO Severstal v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in China and Russia – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) – Use of facts available – Article 2(3), (4), (9), (10) and (12) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(3), (4), (9), (10) and (12) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Calculation of the normal value, the export price and the dumping margin – Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Determination of the existence of injury – Article 3(7) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(7) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Causal link – Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Injury elimination – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration – Proportionality – Manifest errors of assessment.#Case T-753/16.

cjeu_case ·
27524

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#PAO Severstal v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in China and Russia – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) – Use of facts available – Article 2(3), (4), (9), (10) and (12) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(3), (4), (9), (10) and (12) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Calculation of the normal value, the export price and the dumping margin – Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Determination of the existence of injury – Article 3(7) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(7) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Causal link – Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Injury elimination – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration – Proportionality – Manifest errors of assessment.#Case T-753/16.

cjeu_case ·
27525

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#Novolipetsk Steel PJSC (NLMK) v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in China and Russia – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) – Use of facts available – Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Determination of injury – Article 3(7) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(7) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Causal link – Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Elimination of injury – Rights of the defence – Equality of arms – Principle of good administration – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Manifest errors of assessment.#Case T-752/16.

cjeu_case ·
27526

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 22 September 2021.#Novolipetsk Steel PJSC (NLMK) v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in China and Russia – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) – Use of facts available – Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Determination of injury – Article 3(7) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(7) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Causal link – Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation 2016/1036) – Elimination of injury – Rights of the defence – Equality of arms – Principle of good administration – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Manifest errors of assessment.#Case T-752/16.

cjeu_case ·
27527

Case T-753/16: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — Severstal v Commission (Dumping — Imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in China and Russia — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) — Use of facts available — Article 2(3), (4), (9), (10) and (12) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(3), (4), (9), (10) and (12) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Calculation of the normal value, the export price and the dumping margin — Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Determination of the existence of injury — Article 3(7) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(7) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Causal link — Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Injury elimination — Rights of the defence — Principle of good administration — Proportionality — Manifest errors of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
27528

Case T-752/16: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — NLMK v Commission (Dumping — Imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in China and Russia — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) — Use of facts available — Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Determination of injury — Article 3(7) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(7) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Causal link — Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation 2016/1036) — Elimination of injury — Rights of the defence — Equality of arms — Principle of good administration — Obligation to state reasons — Proportionality — Manifest errors of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
27529

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 22 September 2021.#Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI) v European Commission.#State aid – Electricity supply tariff – Decision of an arbitration tribunal setting the tariff charged to Alouminion – Decision to take no further action on the complaint – Decision finding no State aid – Challengeable act – Standing as party concerned – Interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Admissibility – Whether attributable to the State – Advantage – Private operator principle – Serious difficulties.#Joined Cases T-639/14 RENV, T-352/15 and T-740/17.

cjeu_case ·
27530

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 22 September 2021.#Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI) v European Commission.#State aid – Electricity supply tariff – Decision of an arbitration tribunal setting the tariff charged to Alouminion – Decision to take no further action on the complaint – Decision finding no State aid – Challengeable act – Standing as party concerned – Interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Admissibility – Whether attributable to the State – Advantage – Private operator principle – Serious difficulties.#Joined Cases T-639/14 RENV, T-352/15 and T-740/17.

cjeu_case ·
27531

Joint Cases T-639/14 RENV, T-352/15 and T-740/17: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — DEI v Commission (State aid — Tariff for electricity supply — Fixing of the tariff invoiced to Alouminion by decision of an arbitration tribunal — Decision to take no further action on the complaint — Decision finding that there is no aid — Act open to challenge — Interested person status — Interest in bringing proceedings — Locus standi — Admissibility — Imputability to the State — Advantage — Private operator principle — Serious difficulties)

cjeu_case ·
27533

Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 21 septembre 2021.#Nemzeti Útdíjfizetési Szolgáltató Zrt. contre NW.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Article 1er, paragraphe 1 – Champ d’application matériel – Notion de “matière civile et commerciale” – Procédure visant le recouvrement d’une redevance liée à l’utilisation d’une route soumise à péage.#Affaire C-30/21.

cjeu_case ·
27534

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 September 2021.#Nemzeti Útdíjfizetési Szolgáltató Zrt. v NW.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Lennestadt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 1(1) – Substantive scope – Concept of ‘civil and commercial matters’ – Proceedings seeking to recover a charge relating to the use of a toll road.#Case C-30/21.

cjeu_case ·
27538

Case C-30/21: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Lennestadt — Germany) — Nemzeti Útdíjfizetési Szolgáltató Zrt. v NW (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 1(1) — Substantive scope — Concept of ‘civil and commercial matters’ — Proceedings seeking to recover a charge relating to the use of a toll road)

cjeu_case ·