27361Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 30 September 2021.#European Court of Auditors v Karel Pinxten.#Article 286(6) TFEU – Breach of obligations arising from the office of Member of the European Court of Auditors – Deprivation of the right to a pension – Right to effective judicial protection – Regularity of the investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Internal procedure at the Court of Auditors – Activity incompatible with the duties of a Member of the Court of Auditors – Mission expenses and daily allowances – Representation and hospitality expenses – Use of official car – Use of a driver – Conflict of interest – Proportionality of the penalty.#Case C-130/19.cjeu_case · 30 сентября 2021 г.
27362Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 30 September 2021.#European Court of Auditors v Karel Pinxten.#Article 286(6) TFEU – Breach of obligations arising from the office of Member of the European Court of Auditors – Deprivation of the right to a pension – Right to effective judicial protection – Regularity of the investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Internal procedure at the Court of Auditors – Activity incompatible with the duties of a Member of the Court of Auditors – Mission expenses and daily allowances – Representation and hospitality expenses – Use of official car – Use of a driver – Conflict of interest – Proportionality of the penalty.#Case C-130/19.cjeu_case · 30 сентября 2021 г.
27363Case C-130/19: Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 30 September 2021 — European Court of Auditors v Karel Pinxten (Article 286(6) TFEU — Breach of the obligations arising from the office of Member of the European Court of Auditors — Deprivation of the right to a pension — Right to effective judicial protection — Regularity of the investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) — Internal procedure at the Court of Auditors — Activity incompatible with the duties of a Member of the Court of Auditors — Mission expenses and daily allowances — Representation and entertainment expenses — Use of an official car — Use of a driver — Conflict of interests — Proportionality of the penalty)cjeu_case · 30 сентября 2021 г.
27364Case T-630/21: Action brought on 29 September 2021 — Çolakoğlu Metalurji and Çolakoğlu Dış Ticaret v Commissioncjeu_case · 29 сентября 2021 г.
27365Case T-629/21: Action brought on 29 September 2021 — Ereğli Demir ve Çelik Fabrikaları and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · 29 сентября 2021 г.
27366Case T-628/21: Action brought on 29 September 2021 — Tequila Revolución v EUIPO — Horizons Group (London) (Revolution Vodka)cjeu_case · 29 сентября 2021 г.
27367Case T-624/21: Action brought on 29 September 2021 — Primagran v EUIPO — Primagaz (prımagran)cjeu_case · 29 сентября 2021 г.
27368Case T-623/21: Action brought on 29 September 2021 — Puma v EUIPO — Vaillant (Puma)cjeu_case · 29 сентября 2021 г.
27369Case T-622/21: Action brought on 29 September 2021 — Puma v EUIPO — SMB Swisspour (PUMA)cjeu_case · 29 сентября 2021 г.
27370Case T-621/21: Action brought on 29 September 2021 — Lemken v EUIPO (sky blue)cjeu_case · 29 сентября 2021 г.
27371Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 September 2021.#Luis Gonzalo Segura del Oro Pulido v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Actions for failure to act – Failure of the Commission to initiate infringement proceedings – Dismissal of the action as manifestly inadmissible – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-225/21 P.cjeu_case · 29 сентября 2021 г.
27372Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 September 2021.#Luis Gonzalo Segura del Oro Pulido v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Actions for failure to act – Failure of the Commission to initiate infringement proceedings – Dismissal of the action as manifestly inadmissible – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-225/21 P.cjeu_case · 29 сентября 2021 г.
27373Case C-608/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 29 September 2021 — XN v Politseyski organ pri 02 RU SDVRcjeu_case · 29 сентября 2021 г.
27374Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 September 2021.#Univers Agro EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark AGATE – Absolute ground for refusal – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-592/20.cjeu_case · 29 сентября 2021 г.
27375Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 September 2021.#Univers Agro EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark AGATE – Absolute ground for refusal – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-592/20.cjeu_case · 29 сентября 2021 г.
27376Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 September 2021.#Marián Kočner v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Non-contractual liability – Expert reports carried out by Europol for the purposes of national criminal proceedings – Alleged unauthorised disclosure of data – Regulation (EU) 2016/794 – Article 50(1) – Non-material harm – Causal link.#Case T-528/20.cjeu_case · 29 сентября 2021 г.
27377Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 September 2021.#Marián Kočner v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Non-contractual liability – Expert reports carried out by Europol for the purposes of national criminal proceedings – Alleged unauthorised disclosure of data – Regulation (EU) 2016/794 – Article 50(1) – Non-material harm – Causal link.#Case T-528/20.cjeu_case · 29 сентября 2021 г.
27378Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 September 2021.#Società agricola Vivai Maiorana Ss and Others v European Commission.#Agriculture – Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 – Protective measures against pests of plants – List of Union regulated non-quarantine pests – Threshold above which the presence of a Union regulated non-quarantine pest on plants for planting has an unacceptable economic impact – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 – Professional associations – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Admissibility – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-116/20.cjeu_case · 29 сентября 2021 г.
27379Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 September 2021.#Società agricola Vivai Maiorana Ss and Others v European Commission.#Agriculture – Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 – Protective measures against pests of plants – List of Union regulated non-quarantine pests – Threshold above which the presence of a Union regulated non-quarantine pest on plants for planting has an unacceptable economic impact – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 – Professional associations – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Admissibility – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-116/20.cjeu_case · 29 сентября 2021 г.
27380Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 September 2021.#Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International Registration designating the European Union – Word mark MASTIHACARE – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-60/20.cjeu_case · 29 сентября 2021 г.